this post was submitted on 19 Dec 2025
313 points (99.4% liked)

AntiTrumpAlliance

1260 readers
751 users here now

About

An alliance among all who oppose Donald Trump's actions, positions, cabinet, supporters, policies, or motives. This alliance includes anyone from the left or the right; anyone from any religion or lack thereof; anyone from any country or state; any man, woman or child.

Rules

-No pro-Trump posts or comments

-No off topic posts

-Be civil

-No trolling

-Follow Lemmy terms of service

Social Media

Discord

Reddit

Other Communities

!desantisthreatensusa@lemmy.world

!antifascism@midwest.social

!politicus@kbin.social

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

“There are a lot more people out here living in abject poverty than what people like to think or admit to. You voted for this—and now we’re paying the price.”

Employees learned of the cuts on Monday in a video message from Michael Adams, CEO of BlueOval SK.

Adams announced the transition would mean “the end of all BlueOval SK positions in Kentucky.”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jaschen306@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 hour ago

My entire team was laid off.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 10 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

That’s what Ford wants. EV’s are expensive and retooling to meet emissions standards is expensive. The profit margins are thin if there are any at all. Better to lay off all these people and push the good ol’ ICE production line where there are known profits to be made.

[–] molten@lemmy.world 26 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (2 children)

Ford dropped 100k on Donald trumps campaign in 2024

[–] Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 hour ago

And the articles for says this will cost them billions. Anyone involved with donations to Trump should be fucking fired.

[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 12 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Ford didn't say they regretted it.

[–] molten@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

Ah yeah whoops. Correct.

[–] stevestevesteve@lemmy.world 61 points 12 hours ago (5 children)

When did layoffs go from massively shameful and embarrassing, to some kind of "eh it happens" type of thing? A few decades ago a layoff like this would have almost signaled the death of the company but now it seems like everyone does it all the time

[–] SoupBrick@pawb.social 26 points 12 hours ago
[–] jode@pawb.social 8 points 10 hours ago

This will tell you everything you need to know about that BS

https://youtu.be/YZv7wc7USQE

[–] snooggums@piefed.world 11 points 12 hours ago

It was common back in the 80s at least, maybe further back.

[–] PoopingCough@lemmy.world 8 points 12 hours ago

It was Jack Welch

[–] MapleEngineer@lemmy.world 21 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Canada just got a huge investment from Europe to build a synthetic graphite plant for EV batteries. The workers could move up here but they would have to give up their guns and hate speech, accept that women and the LGBTQ+ have rights, that their religious rights end at the end of their noses and that their religion tells them what they can't do, not what other people can't do.

[–] greedytacothief@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

I thought for a foreigner to get a job in Canada the company had to prove that there isn't a Canadian who can do the job or something like that.

load more comments (2 replies)

I hope the fired Kentuckians enjoy their sudden unemployment just before Christmas. You fucked around, now find out. If you need help, bootstraps baby!

[–] pinheadednightmare@lemmy.world 9 points 11 hours ago

Sucks when your actions come back and bite you in the ass. I just feel bad for the people that didn’t vote for Trump. Typically I would have sympathy for both sides, but Trump was very clear what he was gonna do before the election.

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 44 points 15 hours ago

Sucks when the leopard eagles come home to roost, donut.

[–] SuiXi3D@fedia.io 15 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

I mean, what were they supposed to do? Trump enacted all these tariffs and all the money they spent on the plant would never be recouped in vehicle sales, so they’re rejiggering the factory to produce (sigh) data center batteries. At the end of the day they’re a corporation, and they’re gonna go where the money is. Apparently that money is not in retraining the existing workforce?

It’s just a dumb situation all around. Not like anyone’s buying cars anyway. And now folks that are in abject poverty will be even worse off. Trump did this, and Ford in their infinite wisdom made it worse, if inadvertently.

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 11 points 12 hours ago

I'd buy an electric pickup tomorrow if they made one in the same style as a 90s single cab ranger or s10

[–] lectricleopard@lemmy.world 21 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (9 children)

Guess im never buying a Ford. Shame, because I was a fan as a kid.

Edit: I owned a Ford Taurus as my first car years and years ago. It had problems, but it was a comfortable ride. I liked fastback mustangs as a kid. As an adult I hoped that they could one day make sense as a purchase. My next car will almost certainly be electric.

[–] the_q@lemmy.zip 25 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Buying an American car is a bad idea regardless of logo.

[–] GenosseFlosse@feddit.org 4 points 8 hours ago

It's not that bad if you have infinity money for repairs, spare parts, petrol and an Asian car that can reliable take you to the mechanic and back home. Source: bought an second hand American Car online when I came home drunk from a party.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 31 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (5 children)

I mean it's Trump that removed their entire market. People don't buy EVs unless there's legislative pressure being built on ICE emissions.

Not that Ford couldn't have handled this with more grace of course... But I honestly doubt they were happy about the idea of building an entire plant and then shutting it down

[–] GenosseFlosse@feddit.org 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

EVs can be much cheaper than petrol, depending on how much you drive and how much you spend on petrol or power.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Okay, so let me preface this by saying that I'm not necessarily arguing but just doing the math for my own country just because it's fun. It's also not super precise.

If you drive a lot, you'd be buying diesel not petrol. Usually. But that's just me nitpicking, I assume you mean ICEs in general.

It depends on your region too. In some, EVs are so much cheaper to run it's not funny, in some they're comparable.

In my country, if you choose the correct power company for home electricity, a public charger during daytime is 0.333€/kWh. If you use a cheaper power company at home, you pay 0.37€/kWh at the biggest chain of public chargers. This of course assumes you use the cheaper, <=100 kW chargers. Faster ones are more expensive so we'll just pretend they don't exist. Charging at home varies from 0.05 to 5€/kWh if you have a variable rate package or if you lock yourself in to a price it's probably around 0.15 if you locked in a few years ago for a long period, or 0.2 if you lock in now. This is including the transmission fees and everything.

So let's say bare minimum 0.15 unless you want to time it by hour, and maximum 0.33 because most people aren't stupid and unplug their shit when the prices skyrocket for an hour or 2, so realistically home charging SHOULD always be cheaper than public charging.

An MB EQE sedan will do roughly 20 kWh/100km driving on a highway at 120km/h with AC and stuff on - normal driving, not super eco, but also not very wasteful. That can be anywhere between 3 euros per 100 km (VERY cheap compared to ICE) and 6.6 EUR per 100 km. Comparable E-Class diesel sedan or wagon will do 4.5-5 l/100km these days at same speeds, so 6€ per 100 km at the fuel price I got last time, 4€ at the best price I can get, or 7 for the worst prices seen this year.

Let's assume you have a great electricity price locked in and you only ever charge at home, and that fuel prices go back up and stay there. This is a 4€ difference in the price for 100 km, in the EV's favor. A huge difference tbh. But the price difference for cheapest EQE and cheapest diesel E-Class is 10k in favor of the diesel. At this price difference, it takes 250k km for the power savings to pay off. A lot of these cars get sold off before the first owner even reaches that mileage.

This math changes significantly with used cars, though. Cheapest BMW i4 I could find is 43k for a 2023. Cheapest diesel 4 series is 40k (and has more kilometers actually). At 3k price difference it takes only 75k km to pay off the difference assuming similar efficiency ratings for both, I cba to look it up. I wanted to do i5 and 5 series, but the i5s are so new they haven't really depreciated yet.

And if you use public chargers exclusively, well, it'll essentially never pay off at current prices. But that could change in the future.

Another thing to consider, though, is that here you're not really getting a "driver's car" with the ICE. Diesels are work horses and inline 4s particularly aren't anything special. The EVs, both the Mercedes and BMW, have significantly more power. You kinda get more for your money there, I was just doing a purely financial comparison, while keeping to German cars because that's pretty much all I drive usually (may be changing this though, I'm eyeing a hybrid Lexus as my stepping stone car between my diesel A6 and whatever EV I'll buy when my finances have recovered from a shitty marriage)

[–] GenosseFlosse@feddit.org 0 points 3 hours ago

You are comparing expensive German cars with expensive German power prices. If you look at at cheap used Nissan leaf and pay half of that for power, then the only argument for petrol is the range which you don't have on old and cheap EVs.

[–] snooggums@piefed.world 24 points 14 hours ago (18 children)

Trump may have put a small speedbump in the path, but Ford could have absolutely pushed forward with promoting EVs if they wanted to. People do buy EVs even without incentives, and car companies have been telling people what their preferences are the whole time.

load more comments (18 replies)
[–] sparky1337@ttrpg.network 6 points 13 hours ago (5 children)

I think they overestimated their market. I think the Lightning was the perfect truck to spearhead the EV transition. It looks, drives, and feels like a normal (yet powerful) truck. Being the highest volume seller, electrifying the F150 made sense on paper.

But that’s where it really stops.

The kind of person that buys a 4x4 F150, is not the same demographic that wants to be seen in an EV. As childish as the mentality sounds, that’s the demographic.

Where they sell 70,000 F-series (150 through 550 I think super duty’s included until dump beds), they only sold ~1,500-2,000 lightnings a month. Which honestly isn’t that bad for such a niche product.

I think the move to give it a plug in hybrid style powertrain will help sales as our travel charging infrastructure is still garbage. But try and tell people that they can just charge at home with an L2 and they freak out. It’s also frustrating that most people who are against EV’s just don’t understand technology in general.

In contrast, Ford sells about 15,000 mavericks a month. More when it was newer, same with the Lightning.

I do agree with your points and that Ford isn’t happy, and they could have handled the whole situation a little better.

[–] Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 hour ago

that’s the demographic.

Remember when marketing departments existed and it just drones pushing noise into the social media streams?

There was a time when company's would sell people on ideas to create the demand.

Why is it that electric cars have to be weird, ridiculously high performance, or both?

I don't want strange controls, I don't want virtual door handles, I don't want a cab full of computer screens, I don't want bizarre styling, and I honestly don't want a 250mph 0-60 in 0.2 seconds hypercar. Give me a car that looks and acts normally but has an electric powertrain so that I can plug it in at home rather than having to go to a gas station all the time.

[–] snooggums@piefed.world 1 points 7 hours ago

They should have a fully electric Maverick.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 2 points 10 hours ago

I also think that PHEVs are great for all the rurals. Especially if they keep the ICE fairly powerful. Just tell people "for your grocery run to town you don't need any fuel, but to get to the next town over you can just hoon the ecoboost. Or fuck it, build a V8 diesel PHEV. Nothing stopping them from doing it, it's not like F series buyers care about excess weight lmao

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 4 points 12 hours ago

I think it's less about aversion to EVs and more about aversion to the $100,000 price tag.

If that thing is $50k, I think sales at least stay even, if not pick up.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] assembly@lemmy.world 9 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I’m pretty sure most major brands are aligned with maga at this point. Toyota has gone maga with their (I think) CEO putting on trump merch for photos. Stellantis and GM contributed to trump, and ford seems to be going in that direction. Tesla is obvious. Seems like what remains is expensive brands (BMW, Porsche, Mercedes) and Hyundai, Rivian, and Subaru. Not sure where Nissan sits in all this.

[–] PP_BOY_@lemmy.world 10 points 14 hours ago (3 children)

Former CEO for Toyota, but none of that should matter too much if you buy pre-owned anyway. Tesla maybe notwithstanding. Don't be the sucker who buys new

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] 13igTyme@piefed.social 8 points 15 hours ago

Ford's always been crap since the 70s. There's a reason they say Fix Or Repair Daily or Found On Road Dead.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›