this post was submitted on 19 Dec 2025
212 points (98.2% liked)

LinkedinLunatics

5879 readers
253 users here now

A place to post ridiculous posts from linkedIn.com

(Full transparency.. a mod for this sub happens to work there.. but that doesn't influence his moderation or laughter at a lot of posts.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The guy is getting roasted in the comments too, especially about being unfair to NDs

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] loonsun@sh.itjust.works 22 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Oh fuck not this guy leaving containment and ending up on Lemmy of all places.

Ok so this guy is in my field and is 100% the grandpa he appears to be. The worst part thought is that if you catched this, he talked about a career in "I-O". Most of you probably don't know what he's talking about, but he's referring to the field of "Industrial and Organizational Psychology" which is the study of people within organizations. What makes this extra bad is that we actually are the ones who study stuff like "how to conduct ethical and high quality interviews". So he basically violated about everything we recommend in our field why doing this and publishing it. Its honestly embarrassing that this will be many of your first impressions of my profession.

Also the comments are roasting him so badly OP as the comments are likely filled with people who are experts in the subject, so its a deep roast

[–] Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

I wonder if this asshat enjoys all the scam calls he answers.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

There's no way in hell that's a paid internship.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 7 hours ago

startup consulting consortium

🤮

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 1 points 7 hours ago

It seems to me that looking for a job in the pre-internet days was a fairer process that gave more unemployed an equal chance. Nowadays with these "corporate" job apps it just seems like your screaming into the wind.

[–] taco@anarchist.nexus 114 points 1 day ago (2 children)

ScKWAae5f3kWM9m.png

He had a pretty reasonable response to the backlash, at least.

[–] ramble81@lemmy.zip 61 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Honestly more people in high positions need a vibe check every now and then. Rich and powerful people become so insulated and surrounded by yes-men they think their ideas are infallible. As negative as social media is, one of the nice things is it levels the playing field a bit and gets that brutal feedback straight to them.

(Granted the truly narcissistic and arrogant will just brush it off, but for some, it’ll cause them to reflect)

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago

I'm largely convinced that lack of vibe checking is why the particularly powerful and particularly powerless seem to lose their minds in the same way. You're about equally likely to convince the ceo and the homeless guy out front that what they're saying is completely untethered from reality, and they're similarly likely to make you regret trying.

[–] blazeknave@lemmy.world 7 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Less shocking than usual. The rest of his post was pretty on point tbh. If anyone could acknowledge their faults, it's someone that hires the whole person.

[–] taco@anarchist.nexus 3 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

Nothing screams "hires the whole person" like dismissing candidates for arbitrary reasons like being too busy to answer the phone.

[–] VitoRobles@lemmy.today 2 points 3 hours ago

I've been in so many corporate jobs where they dismiss candidates because they couldnt solve brain teasers or explain what they would put in a ultimate burrito. I shit you not.

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Counterpoint. If you give someone your phone number, you shouldn't be shocked if they try to call it.

[–] taco@anarchist.nexus 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Nobody mentioned being shocked; your "counterpoint" is countering a point nobody made. You don't have to be shocked to be busy or avoid answering unknown numbers, ( which is the norm now )

It's expected that a caller with a legitimate professional purpose would leave a message. Has been since the answering machine came around. This isn't some sort of novel wholistic approach to someone's personally, it's a specific, arbitrary filter to find people who don't follow normal telephone interaction behaviors.

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world -1 points 55 minutes ago (2 children)

If you are not going to answer unknown numbers, don't give your number to unknown people.

This is basic logic. Nothing to do with imaginary "normal telephone interaction behaviors".

[–] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 1 points 24 minutes ago

So I understand you've literally never picked up a cellphone. Do you know what they look like?

[–] InvalidName2@lemmy.zip 11 points 19 hours ago

Crisis averted to those who did not answer.

Someone of his age and in his position should already know and demonstrate proper decorum, even with "modern technology" like .... voicemail? And acceptable procedure, like scheduling important calls. And having a bit of grace. Or a smidgen of empathy. Uh, how is he qualified to be President and CEO when he lacks anything necessary to be a leader?

Even in the best of interpretations, this is someone enormously out of touch. Even with the apology posted below, there's no way I could or would have confidence in this person's leadership. It's one thing to make a mistake, it's another to be so woefully out of touch with reality for so long that you literally didn't know that leaving voicemail is a normal thing people do and giving folks a heads up so they expect your call and can make themselves available for it is just good manners at a minimum.

[–] owenfromcanada@lemmy.ca 128 points 1 day ago (20 children)

Does this guy not understand that 99% of calls from unknown numbers are spam? If he picks the person who always answers, he's gonna be disappointed when they're spending more time answering spam calls than doing intern work.

[–] VitoRobles@lemmy.today 2 points 3 hours ago

He's ripe for phone scams.

[–] West_of_West@piefed.social 28 points 1 day ago

Since hiring Bob the amount of phishing has gone up. Bro clicks on everything

load more comments (18 replies)
[–] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 71 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The most obvious issue with this is that most people aren't (or at least shouldn't be) always available for calls on their personal phones at random times during normal office hours. If you do it this way, you're pretty much pre-selecting for people who don't currently have a job and aren't in school/college.

[–] PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca 21 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I don't think this is that bad.

A bit unorthodox, and old school, but unorthodox interviews aren't bad and neither are phone interviews.

The problem is that he didn't provide a number for people to add to their safe-callers list, so that they know it isn't spam when he calls.

Also, depending on the position, he needs to make sure that the call is not going to be in the middle of important meetings. He presumably doesn't want to hire people who take calls in the middle of client negotiations

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] mech@feddit.org 37 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I won't play phone tag with you

Plays phone tag with you

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Okokimup@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Septimaeus 24 points 1 day ago

Kinda cool that he would call directly. That’s pretty human compared to the usual robot and virtual assistant driven cattle calls. But it’s a bit too old school. he really should just leave a message. Or respond to the email to setup a call.

Because gone are the days that people build their lives around random phone calls. Most of the time, it’s considered rude to even take a call without escaping to some isolated location, especially if others could hear your phone ringing first. And of course if the number is unknown it’s most likely spam.

He either needs a time machine or needs to learn how phone calls work in the 21st century.

[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 29 points 1 day ago

I love posts like this because they’re almost always from out-of-touch dickheads that I would never want to work for anyway. I don’t want to get laid off when you run your company into the ground, asshole.

[–] Atropos@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago

The man has a point about interviewing for an intern based on personality, instead of experience or company bootlicking.

But the rest comes straight out of the looney bin.

load more comments
view more: next ›