this post was submitted on 18 Dec 2025
162 points (97.6% liked)

World News

51361 readers
2018 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] luciferofastora@feddit.org 1 points 3 hours ago

The Security Dilemma of international relations: Keeping your own country safe requires doing things that will make your neighbours feel less safe.

[–] dukatos@lemmy.zip 1 points 6 hours ago

Ask USA for some...

[–] Jym66@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

I thought Japan could never have an army again after WW2, never mind nukes??

[–] chunes@lemmy.world 10 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

The more nations that have them, the higher the chance they'll be used. It's going to happen sooner than we think.

[–] minkymunkey_7_7@lemmy.world 4 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

I actually think the Star TREK First Contact dates may be right.

[–] Yeller_king@reddthat.com 2 points 11 hours ago

I need em too.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 18 points 22 hours ago (15 children)

Every country needs to have a nuke, based on what we're seeing the US and Israel do to Palestine and what Russia is doing to Ukraine.

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] BodyPower@lemmy.world 6 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Denmark needs the nuke too to protect it self from Russia, but also the US.

[–] HerrBeter@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

Med plutonium tvingar vi dansken på knä

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 4 points 20 hours ago

Well, that's what happens when you elect a fascist.

[–] Arancello@aussie.zone 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Short answer is yes. Trump has proven that any alliance is useless. So every country needs the ultimate deterrent. That means nuclear and a reliable delivery system. Thats the only way Russia, the us, China or other aggressors can be held at bay. Ukraine and Venezuela probably both regretting decisions that removed their deterrent.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago

Short answer is yes. Trump has proven that any alliance is useless. So every country needs the ultimate deterrent.

Good point.

[–] sik0fewl@lemmy.ca 29 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Any nation that wants to keep their sovereignty needs nukes. Agreements like the Budapest Memorandum were a mistake for some of the countries involved (Ukraine).

[–] vega208@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 day ago (10 children)

Lol, I wonder when Ukrainians will connect the dots that they're in this position solely because they put their faith into western powers that didn't deliver on their side of the bargain.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 3 points 20 hours ago

This is the correct answer.

The only thing that keeps imperialism at bay is mutually-assured destruction.

[–] WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I mean, I have a chaotic solution we might try. Let's simply...reverse the Budapest Memorandum! Let's just hand Ukraine a few hundred thermonuclear warheads, with launchers and launch codes and say, "here, go have fun!"

"The president has announced...that we have reversed the Budapest Memorandum..."

:D

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] porcoesphino@mander.xyz 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is scary for the increased risk of some pretty terrible outcomes but with US security guarantees as untrustworthy as they have become then actions like this are tough to argue against

[–] porcoesphino@mander.xyz 14 points 1 day ago

If I was a South Korean or Taiwanese government official working to ensure future sovereignty, I'd be considering the same

[–] thatradomguy@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Anyone else feeling WW3 vibes yet? No? Just me? K

[–] Isthisreddit@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago

Rising fascism all over the place, what can possibly go wrong

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] stupidopensourceBS@lemmy.world 1 points 19 hours ago
[–] treadful@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 day ago

Now I want to see a movie where the only country that can have nukes is the last one that got nuked.

load more comments
view more: next ›