probably doesnt want to be typecasted, alot of actors are unfortunately typecasted.
this post was submitted on 18 Dec 2025
163 points (98.8% liked)
Television
2515 readers
558 users here now
Welcome to Television
This community is for discussion of anything related to television or streaming.
Other Communities
- !casualconversation@piefed.social
- !movies@piefed.social
- !animation@piefed.social
- !trailers@lemmy.blahaj.zone
Television Communities
A community for discussion of anything related to Television via broadcast or streaming.
Rules:
- Be respectful and courteous to all members.
- Avoid offensive or discriminatory remarks.
- Avoid spamming or promoting unrelated products/services.
- Avoid personal attacks or engaging in heated arguments.
- Do not engage in any form of illegal activity or promote illegal content.
- Please mask any and all spoilers with spoiler tags.
List of Best Rated TV Series as voted by the Fediverse
founded 7 months ago
MODERATORS
I feel bad for a few of the actors who aren't in eternal denial about the show being a imploded cultural black hole.
who?
I mean, the story is over. It's not like there's anything else for him to go back to, is there?
They could say the last season wasn't cannon and try again, otherwise totally agree.
If studios can milk even dead characters, how much more for characters that ended up surviving at the end. If there's no story, I'm sure they'll be happy to make one.
But he is dead
He’s been dead before
This was his response to him coming back to the role for the audiobook. He just did Lockheart in new Harry Potter books so it was a natural question.
But who's got a better story than Jon Snow? Ah right, Bran did.
Arya did in the books.
think it was a joke about what they said in the show in the kings moot or whatever before declaring him king
It clearly was
They were taking about rebooting the last season I think ?
I would be ok if they did this and replaced everyone as long as we got a better ending. They can even put name tags on everyone so we know who is who. We got a coffee cup in one episode, I think name tags would be fine.
This just means they haven’t offered him enough yet
Kit.. Didn’t Connery ever teach you anything.
NEVER SAY NEVER AGAIN.
A film that Connery should definitely have said Dr. No to
and by it i mean my peanits
He's super keen to be in Harry Potter tho
"I can accept being a transphobe but I draw the line at bad writing and plot structure."
Kit Harington probably.
Having watched the last season, you have got to at least understand his point.
I'd bet a substantial amount of money that eventually he will play the part for another pile of money. Probably not for a few years though unless other work dries up. It's not like he was making Friends level money or would ever make anything like those actors make even today in residuals.
Just takes a story set in the future after the events of GoT and a desire for more spending money. Articles mention his net worth being around 10-15m, which is enough to never work if you're content living a upper middle class life... but not enough to really live anything remotely extravagantly.
Isn't his wife (also from GoT) super rich?
4m net worth?
At one point I did the math and dividends from 4k in dividend stocks gets you like 100k/year. Hardly “super rich” when houses and condos are practically a million bucks in HCOL
But, when its an indefinite source of 100k for essentially life that it covers the monthly cost of mortgage which ends up steadier than the unpredictability of rent I think that is super rich in my eyes.
Because the big thing is the continued 100k isn't unpredictable like the uncertainty of the job market, which can get worse as people get older with companies looking to lay them off for the next generation who will take less and new skills.
So it might not seem the stereotypical super rich of private jets and mansion, but once you look at the stability of the money source it is deceptively super rich. Like the millionaire next door type rich, and the type of rich that would take the average person decades and decades of saving and investments turning out well to attain and be super old by then.
I don't even know what your point is. Sure, almost everyone in the world would be set for life with 4m. It's still only enough to provide means for a very modest life with dividends in cities like Boston, LA, NYC...
We usually successful performers burn through their monies quick because with no need to work, you can blow cash REAL quick. Few are so disciplined as to live on something like 4m forever if they weren't brought up with wealth and the understanding to live frugally.