this post was submitted on 17 Dec 2025
1553 points (99.3% liked)

Political Memes

10123 readers
1957 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 256 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Enter “Why should I have to pay for someone else’s kid!!!”

Because you live in a society, dipshit. Plus, it’s cheaper to feed him breakfast and cover his daycare than it is to incarcerate him in 20 years.

[–] U7826391786239@lemmy.zip 107 points 1 week ago (4 children)

have you considered how many americans would be happy to pay to just go ahead and incarcerate poor kids right now

[–] Canconda@lemmy.ca 50 points 1 week ago (2 children)

and they're not even factoring in how for profit prisons are literal slave labour camps.

[–] slevinkelevra@sh.itjust.works 20 points 1 week ago

Plus that the low wages outbid other businesses easily and are heavily subsidized by the tax payer.

[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (7 children)

According to the ACLU and the University of Chicago Law school the value of goods from involuntary prison labor in the US is about two billion annually. That’s not even a rounding error as compared to the annual US federal budget.

[–] cheers_queers@lemmy.zip 13 points 1 week ago (2 children)

hi, public school worker here..it is not only legal but encouraged for districts to buy furniture, air filters, and other goods from prison labor sources. one year we even had a group of convicts come to paint the walls, they did a horrible job and people ended up with stolen money also. it blows my mind that this is acceptable.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Yeah the cruelty is definitely the point for far too many. I have a hard time wrapping my head around the fact that so many people don’t actually give a shit about the area they live in being a nice, human conducive place. Littering, gated communities, pollution, NIMBY bullshit… I could go on forever.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Phil_in_here@lemmy.ca 54 points 1 week ago (2 children)

"Why should I have to pay for someone else's kid?"

"Why should I have to pay for a park I'm not going to visit?"

"Why should I have to pay for a road I may never drive on?"

"The American Military Complex is very responsible with my money and keeps me safe from real threats."

[–] chatokun@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 1 week ago

Well, last statement a lot of antitax are also antiwar. Ron Paul attracted some people because of his antiwar, anti intervention, and freedom regarding drugs platform.

I think that basic form of libertarian is attractive to many if you don't look too closely at what it actually entails and if you only care about yourself and maybe people you know/family.

I generally think of it as childish selfishness we're expected to grow out of once we learn some basic society facts.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 39 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

"pay for someone else's kid" is code for "help someone I don't think deserves to be helped".

Conservatives are all about the hierarchy. In their minds it is an immoral act to give someone a benefit that doesn't deserve it. To do so risks that person getting to be in the wrong place in the hierarchy. And if someone is in the wrong place in the hierarchy, that's going to cause the bad kind of anarchy.

[–] saltesc@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

"Why should I pay for their burning down house?! Privatise the fire department!"

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] bytesonbike@discuss.online 79 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

I pay for insurance and then pay copay.

And then I pay a school tax and pay for school lunch and fees.

And my health insurance doesnt cover teeth so I have that as separate.

And I pay a tax on my food and then if it's a specific type of food, I pay a tax on that.

I also pay taxes and yet my friends pay $2800 to put their kids in a day care.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago (1 children)

$2800 for a lifetime of daycare sounds like a deal

[–] Rocketpoweredgorilla@lemmy.ca 24 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's probably about right if you're antivax /s

[–] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 week ago
[–] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 17 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

TBH depending on the specific european country, it doesn't even look that different, it's just usually way cheaper and not tied to employment, and heavily scales with income.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mirshafie@europe.pub 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

OK let's see. I pay no medical insurance. If I have to see a doctor I pay ~20€ for the visit. If I have to go to the emergency room, I pay nothing. Getting an ambulance is free. The ceiling for my pharmaceuticals bill is ~400€ per year, anything above that is free. Ads for pharmaceuticals are banned.

School and school lunch is free. University is free. Vocational training is free. I get a small stipend (~300€) every month that I study to help with expenses, for up to 5 years. If I live away from my parents it's not enough, but I can get a student loan with 2% interest to cover the rest.

Dental isn't covered from age 19 and up, so that sucks. A visit to the dentist costs ~130€.

I pay 12% VAT on food, and 24% on alcohol. This is flat across the country and included in every quoted price. When I pay income tax, it's already been precalculated for me so I electronically sign the bill unless I have a specific reason to contend it.

The cost of daycare is scaled to household income, but it works out to ~110€ per month for a dual income household. I also get ~130€ per child per month as a stipend regardless of household income.

There are walkways, bicycle paths and public transit. I do not need a car, but I have one.

Sweden. Median worker takes home ~€2800 per month after taxes. This is still significantly lower than most Americans make, but if it wasn't for the housing prices that have risen dramatically in the past decade, it has worked out pretty well overall.

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 54 points 1 week ago (8 children)

Swede here, I have said it before, and I'll say it again:

The Social Democratic is the best ideology humanity has found.

It combines the safety nets of government run services with the powerful incentive of a free market.

Sure, not all sectors are included in the free market, essential services like public transport, power, water, sewage, hospitals, schools, and similar stuff that you need to live and participate in society should be run by the government, and not just by decree, but actually running them.

Anything more should be on a (regulated) free market.

Progressive tax brackets should be kept st a high level, with a public highscore list with a awards like fancy dinners, medals, and other symbols of status for paying a lot of tax, creating more incentives to pay tax.

That to me sounds like a good society

[–] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 18 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

It's pretty good while it lasts, but lately I'm getting the impression that social democratic states are kind of weak against propaganda from other ideologies. Core issue being that even in social democratic states, the rich still accumulate wealth, which gives them undue influence over the population.

[–] the_q@lemmy.zip 37 points 1 week ago (3 children)

There isn't a human on this planet that isn't weak to propaganda.

[–] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Yes. The issue is that social democratic states have a general tendency to be very permissive towards propaganda that is hostile to social democracy, because offering a lot of freedom of expression is generally part of the core ideas of social democracy.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This is a problem of any state with freedom of expression, not specific to social democracy. The USA fell victim to it and was never anywhere close to social democracy.

Public education seems to be the best treatment so far, and it's more prevalent in social democratic states. I sincerely hope something more robust can scale someday.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I think a modified version of social democracy that seeks to prevent excess accumulation of wealth/power would be more resilient to this effect.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] fonix232@fedia.io 10 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Do say, what "incentive" do you see in this "free market"?

Because just FYI, an overwhelming majority of things that actually progressed humanity forward... We're not done for capital. They weren't done in the hopes of getting rich. True innovation, true progress comes not from the want of money or power or control, but by the want of knowledge. And the "free market" most definitely does not incentivise seeking knowledge - in fact said market heavily depends on keeping a big chunk of the population just smart enough to do the menial work they're "needed for" by the ruling elite.

Denmark and Sweden are definitely examples of the direction we should be going, but that's all - they're the direction, not the end goal.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] DupaCycki@lemmy.world 47 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Wait till Americans hear that Danes don't need to calculate their taxes and pay a fee to file them.

[–] Ronno@feddit.nl 12 points 1 week ago (3 children)

A fee to pay taxes? Why not include it in the taxes at that point? It's just ridiculous.

Similar to that time I went to the local garage, my car needed a new 12v battery. Fine, it got swapped for a new one. On the receipt, it had the costs broken down. The garage had the audacity to include a line for: "Charging battery 20 Euro".

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The "fee" is using a private tax preparation service. In theory skippable, but it's just a pain to do.

Once upon a time, maybe forgivable, private sector embracing useful technology before the government was ready, but now the government actively resists making it easier to file taxes, and coincidentally the tax prep companies give a lot of money to politicians....

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kadu@scribe.disroot.org 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Why not include it with thw taxes?

With Americans, the answer is always some private entity mixed in the middle that will make money out of it.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Jankatarch@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

But 90% don't even know libraries offer free help filing your taxes yet.

[–] Dojan@pawb.social 14 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Here in Sweden you generally don't even need help. Naturally there are people with disabilities, or complex financial situations, but that's not most people. For me personally, filing taxes means I log on to the tax office's website, skim through the details to make sure there's no egregious clerical error, and then I click a button to sign off on it. It takes about 5 minutes a year.

If you deal in stocks or buy/sell property a lot it might get a bit more complicated. I think my roomie had deductions because of how much they drives for work, so that added like 5 minutes for supplementary information.

I'm convinced the U.S. makes it complicated for predatory reasons.

load more comments (2 replies)

libraries have books in them, they are afraid they will catch the woke virus...

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 46 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Americans pay high taxes as well: they just don’t get as much for them.

[–] muffedtrims@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

We've got to pay the military contractors.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 35 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Their taxes probably go to things like education and social services instead of bullets and bombs to kill brown people in other lands.

[–] dellish@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

Unfortunately if the orange buffoon gets his way they may end up wasting a lot of good money defending Greenland.

[–] MrVilliam@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 week ago

That's just ridiculous. You don't think that we're spending tax dollars on bullets and bombs to kill brown people in our own land? Look up the 1985 MOVE bombing and any one of the countless events where a cop shot an unarmed law-abiding minority. We don't need to go somewhere else to kill brown people when we have perfectly good brown people at home. Not endorsing it btw, just pointing out the fucked up thing that my country regularly does while somehow still trying to claim with a straight face that we're not racist and "this isn't who we are" every time we do this thing we keep doing...

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 32 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

Americans are way too dumb to grasp the benefit of paying higher taxes in exchange for having more benefits. To be fair, Americans have some of the worst politicians on the planet, so they can't trust their representatives to use their tax dollars responsibly. But American stupidity is what put those politicians there in the first place. So........

[–] reksas@sopuli.xyz 22 points 1 week ago (6 children)

americans are also exposed to constant propaganda, so no wonder they are messed up

You know how abuse produces abusers that perpetuate that abuse? That but on a national level.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] lowside@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

The biggest issue is that America is built on the concept that taxes are bad. The whole founding of the country is built on not paying taxes. It's something kids are taught from a very very young age and even though they are not being directly told that taxes are bad, they are being told how great and important it was to break away from English because they made us pay taxes.

Additionally the taxes that are paid in the USand used terribly. Pretty much no one is happy with how they are allocated. Right wing or left wing. So more taxes just feels like having more blood drained from us while getting nothing good in return.

We need a major tax reform not just an increase or a decrease. I would be happy to pay much higher taxes if I felt the benefits of it. Both for myself and for the people in this country. Instead I know most of what I pay gets wated or lines the pockets of the wealthy.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Someone8765210932@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago

I wonder if the first guy is just engagement farming or genuinely confused. Either way, there probably are plenty of people who are so "brainwashed" that they can't fathom that "happiness" and "tax rates" aren't linked by some law of nature.

[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago

I really wish people would wrap their heads around this

[–] kSPvhmTOlwvMd7Y7E@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago

I ll piss in the soup, but Denmark is also consistently pushing for a total surveillance of all communications in EU

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

Similar line of thought regarding public vs private service providers. There's nothing preventing public services from being as good as or better than private ones, but private ones will always want to extract more value than they provide as profit (which is the extra money left over after paying for everything, including staff). Plus they pay a whole team of people whose whole job is about maximizing profit, which can come at the expense of the quality of the service.

And with public vs private healthcare, there's a whole health insurance industry extracting wealth from the public for the privilege of limiting their healthcare options (otherwise the healthcare providers would be the ones doing the fleecing by recommending unnecessary procedures, which probably still happens anyways). And on top of that, there's an attitude of "just try it, even if it would be illegal, consequences are always avoided by backing down before it gets to court".

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Exactly.

This is what I've been saying for years.

If you have to pay it merely because you're alive, it's a "tax".

Have to pay healthcare insurance because otherwise you will die or lose everything you managed to get from decades of working if you get sick or have an accident: Tax!

Have no other option than to pay for a car and for gas because you have to drive everywhere since the entire infrastructures is designed for that to be the only option you have: Tax!

Need to have Internet access at home because a lot of things must be done via the Internet nowadays and/or you work from home and there only one or two expensive Internet providers: Tax!

Need a mobile phone for everything and there's only a handful of mobile telephony available, all expensive: Tax!

Need a place to live and because of all the realestate "investors" house prices are insane and totally beyond your reach, and rents are high because of being highly correlated with house prices: Tax!

Must pay for an expensive kindergarten for your young kids because both members of a couple must work to keep up with all the other taxes I described above: Tax!

And, guess what, the Taxes paid to the state (be it Local, State-level or Central Government) at least have a chance to partly get back to you as benefits, whilst the Taxes paid to the Private Sector go entirelly to shareholder pockets and fuck you plebe.

In the Neoliberal era even in Europe the whole Economy is riddled with these Taxes payed directly to the Private sector because politicians in the past were payed to make laws to distort certain markets or to remove the state from regulating markets prone to monopolies or cartels (or, even more subtly, to make sure the fines for breaking competition rules are a microscopic fraction of the gains from doing it) hence large sections of the Economy and Society are little more than rent-seeking, but the US is way more extreme than Europe in this because it's even more Neoliberal and its system even in the beginning of this era was way less tempered by a tradition of society-oriented politics than most of Europe.

A LOT of effort has been spent into brainwashing Americans to think that Taxes paid into the common pot which pays for benefits for everybody (even though, in all fairness, a large fraction of that pot just to subsidies for politically connected companies) are a great burden for them even whilst they don't count in the same way all that money they're forced to put in the hands of certain private entities, even though in both cases the system is structured to make sure they have no real choice but to pay and, you know, money is money so even in the purest most selfish logic it's no less a burden if you're forced to pay X amount to the Private sector for unearned profits from merelly having a monopoly or being part of a cartel as it would be to pay X amount to a Public sector that did absolutelly nothing for you (and even in the US the Public sector does do something for everybody, at the very least basic schools and roads).

This shit has been exported to Europe but people here aren't yet anywhere as brainwashed.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (4 children)

We aren't socialists; we are just better at accounting

What's the difference?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Supervisor194@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (10 children)

We aren't socialists

You are socialists, Social Democracy is socialism, it's just a fucking word. America is socialist too, so is every country in the world that has post, police, fire, military - any services everyone needs that everyone pays for through taxation.

The difference in America is that the capital class has realized that the money generated through taxation looks very nice when it is lining their pockets instead - so they spend untold amounts of money on bribing politicians and generating propaganda designed to convince us that certain things, primarily education and healthcare, are not the same kinds of things as post, police, fire and military.

They have been very successful in convincing a majority of Americans that socializing them would lead to the loss of their money, their freedom and even their lives - even as they take the very same money, freedom and lives for themselves. This is because on the whole Americans are, for a variety of reasons also perpetuated by the capital class, deeply stupid.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I live in Canada and we have some of the same stuff included in our taxes.

Our whole system is pretty fucked up when it comes to taxes, but it is what it is. At least we have things in place.

Sure, I'm "paying" for other people to get healthcare, or to get social assistance, police protection, help from fire departments, ambulances.... Good banks and even welfare....

I couldn't possibly give less of a shit.

I like knowing that, when it's my turn to rely on my fellow countrymen for support, I will get it. If I'm sick and unable to work, I can get financial support, and go see a doctor without having to take out a loan or anything.

Social services are good. I'm not going to get denied coverage for a medically necessary procedure. It gets booked and performed.

And I know that Canada's systems are way less comprehensive than most European countries. We have a lot to do before we can get to where we should be. But we're still better off than our southern neighbors.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›