this post was submitted on 16 Dec 2025
74 points (100.0% liked)

Fuck AI

4917 readers
1680 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I got a few suggestions:

  • Spywear
  • Panopticals
  • Suckerbucks
  • LensCrappers

The thing is, if these things had a reason for existing besides being data-collection apparatuses for big tech, I would love them. Not to wear out and about, but for various tasks where a heads-up display would be useful. Like, imagine working on an Arduino, ESP32, etc project and having the pinout overlaid. Or having them display the readout from a multimeter while you're doing electrical work.

Here's hoping the jailbreak scene on these is promising.

all 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Vinny_93@lemmy.world 41 points 3 days ago (2 children)
[–] fullsquare@awful.systems 16 points 3 days ago (1 children)

this is name for wearer, nor the device

[–] Vinny_93@lemmy.world 14 points 3 days ago

Glassholeglasses then

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 10 points 3 days ago

An oldie but a goodie.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 16 points 3 days ago
[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 12 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] ptz@dubvee.org 9 points 3 days ago

Dayum. Simpsons really did do everything first.

[–] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago

Privacy nightmares.

[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 days ago

I'll vote on ewaste. They're ewaste.

[–] unknown1234_5@kbin.earth 6 points 3 days ago

i do like the idea of smartglasses but most of them are sketchy as hell. even realities seems pretty good given the polish of their features. also panopticals is great.

[–] ch00f@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

So many good products have been destroyed by the people making them. Especially from Meta. The Facebook Portal was a fantastic product and my family used them heavily during the pandemic despite knowing that they came from Meta. Not only are they invasive, but Meta started removing features from them when they cancelled them. My aunt called me because Zoom no longer works. I had to explain to her that Meta just removed that functionality.

Having a wearable camera with notifications would be pretty cool I guess. I just don't want them to need a Meta account.

[–] 0li0li@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)
  • Shady shades
  • Opulenses

...but I think people found the best already: spywear

[–] derfunkatron@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I’ll take “solutions to non-existent problems” for $500.

I don’t have a snarky term at the ready, but nightmare shades is what comes to mind.

I distrust these companies and the entire ethos surrounding wearable tech so much that I can’t help but imagine that products like AI (or XR) glasses are just the precursor to something even more awful like implantable tech or other cyberpunk-styled body-mods. I wore a smart watch for a while and all it did was teach me to read my texts twice and spam me with notifications. Once I disabled the move/hydrate prompts and the text and email notifications, it became quite useless on its own. With glasses, it will just become another distraction and data harvester.

More than one Silicon Valley tech dude has been outed as a techno-feudalist singularity-obsessed trans-humanist who read speculative sci-fi and came away with the worst possible interpretation. I can’t imagine any way to positively frame these things.

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

That's....pretty much it.

Though I'll concede the hardware could be useful (not as everyday wear but as a purpose-specific tool).

I did have a smartwatch for a while but it was a DIY kind (Lilygo T-Watch) where you could write your own firmware. Only reason I stopped using it was the battery life was like 90 minutes tops if you wanted to do anything useful with it (ESP32's Bluetooth "low energy" is anything but).

Notifications were kind of useful (I already have my notifications pared down to only essential things) but I found it most useful as a remote control for my phone (media controls, quick actions, etc).

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 days ago

I’ll take “solutions to non-existent problems” for $500.

Problem, how to get images of women in public for later "study".

[–] snooggums@piefed.world 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Camera glasses.

No need to make it super clever, just make it clear they are actually a camera that also functions as glasses. They are likely going to be a hug benefit for people with specific needs and are very convenient as a concept for a replacement to phone cameras, but unfortunately the most evil companies that spy on everyone is making them so they will end up being a net negative for society.

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 4 points 3 days ago

Yeah. Like I said in the post, I would love these for specific use cases if the software worked for me. Unfortunately, until the smart glasses equivalent of LineageOS comes about, they're literal spywear.

[–] pentastarm@piefed.ca 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] ptz@dubvee.org 4 points 3 days ago
[–] recursive_recursion@piefed.ca 5 points 3 days ago

+1 for spywear

[–] kowanatsi@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago
[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 days ago
[–] eleijeep@piefed.social 4 points 3 days ago
[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Idk but they supremely vaporwave in the precise sense of the genre being about decaying visions of a positive future from a perspective hopelessly hurtling into the past.

[–] VerilyFemme@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 3 days ago

Shart Glasses