this post was submitted on 16 Dec 2025
349 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

77715 readers
3807 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.zip/post/55094518

“The UK government wants technology companies to block explicit images on phones and computers by default to protect children, with adults having to verify their age to create and access such content,” the FT report said. “Ministers want the likes of Apple and Google to incorporate nudity-detection algorithms into their device operating systems to prevent users taking photos or sharing images of genitalia unless they are verified as adults.”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] treesquid@lemmy.world 2 points 25 minutes ago* (last edited 25 minutes ago)

England is turning into a really proper shithole country

[–] madjo@feddit.nl 2 points 27 minutes ago

I encourage UK's government to sit on it and rotate. And Keir Starmer can go do one with rusty barbed wire.

[–] specialseaweed@sh.itjust.works 3 points 28 minutes ago

As the dad of a teenager, I am "encouraging" him to put nudity blocking systems on his phone.

oh shit would you look at that i just taught him how to go around me and hide his behavior better im sure there will be no future consequences whatsoever

[–] Pacattack57@lemmy.world 2 points 28 minutes ago

I will never buy a device that cockblocks me. I was talking shit about the nothing phone yesterday but I guess imma save up to buy it.

[–] uberdroog@lemmy.world 2 points 48 minutes ago

Block everything but calls and maps.

[–] SpiceDealer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 hour ago

Why, yes I would like to get literally cockblocked by Google and Apple. Thanks UK! /s

[–] BigBolillo@mgtowlemmy.org 4 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Client side scanning, it's already happening in android running google services there are two apps automatically installed which at least I know scan photos in the device. One is android system saftycore and the other I can't remember the name.

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 4 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Thanks for the info. Didn't know that shit was on my phone. Deleted.

If you happen to remember the second app name, please post it.

[–] BigBolillo@mgtowlemmy.org 1 points 1 hour ago

The other one is Android System Key Verifier, for that I'm not totally sure it's malware but as it have access to your end to end encrypted keys and the way it's secretly installed seems shady to me. Looks like a way for Google to intercept end to end encrypted messages for me.

[–] thethunderwolf@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 3 hours ago

Year of the linux phone

If they make it obligatory, sudo systemctl disable uk-spyware

(I know that in that case it would be illegal to disable, solvable with sudo systemctl enable uk-spyware-spoof)

[–] acme401@lemmy.world 13 points 4 hours ago

Gargle my balls, m'lord.

I think it's time to throw my phone in the river.

[–] SaraTonin@lemmy.world 6 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

They’re obviously going about it the wrong way, but this is inching towards the right way to go - keep age verification like biometric verification, encrypted and on-device. That’s a million times better than getting random pron sites to ask for your biometric data.

If they’d started with this thought and then kept thinking from there, they could have ended up with something decent and effective, rather than the current shitshow.

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 6 points 3 hours ago

Make it the software that comes with the device. So Samsung can install some child protection app and we just uninstall it. Anything bad ever happens on a kids phone? Why did the parents uninstall it?

Make the parents take the responsibility.

[–] Takashiro@lemmy.today 23 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

In the end it isn't about the kids , what they want is control and tracking of everyone.

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

Of course it is, because nobody is willing to try and quantify or qualify the harms that seeing pornography has on a young person. It's just "adult content" so we'll go so far as to put VR headsets on everyone and ask them to verify their age or else they get a PG, low-polygon representation of reality!

[–] habitualcynic@lemmy.world 47 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

Even if you’re morally opposed to the various things this addresses, it is so immensely concerning and unwise to want a corporation to have this much control over your actions, daily life, and liberty.

I don’t think enough people talk about that.

This has been very obvious to a lot of people since mobile devices were originally invented. The notion that you are sold a product that you "own" but is still 100% controlled by the vendor - anyone who thought about it for more than a second knew that it would eventually come to this. Of course, nobody gave even that tiny amount of thought about it. Or they were too naïve to think that a corporation could ever be evil.

I miss the times when spyware was considered uncoool. Mobile devices are the undoubtedly the worst invention of the information age. (And social media is probably the second worst.)

[–] webp@mander.xyz 5 points 5 hours ago (3 children)

Literally. Why should a corporation control when you wank?

[–] habitualcynic@lemmy.world 6 points 4 hours ago

I get that, but I don’t even mean it in that sense. A corporation should not have any control over what I do whatsoever unless I’m their employee.

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 0 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I want them to ban porn so I feel dirty when I watch it.

[–] dogslayeggs@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

I'm normally not one to kink shame, but I'm shaming you right now.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] falseWhite@lemmy.world 12 points 6 hours ago

Fuck you. My phone. My rules. Open source OS it is for my next phone...

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 25 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Kier Starmer is a nevernude. Pass it on.

I bet he takes a bath in a swimsuit

[–] Avicenna@programming.dev 38 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

that will quickly turn into "continuously monitor your users' screens for what they are doing so you can detect nudity" where the real aim will ofcourse be surveillance and selling highly personal data. I don't know about Apple but google will be all over it.

[–] kalpol@lemmy.ca 5 points 5 hours ago

Apple just has better image control

[–] Microtonal_Banana@lemmy.zip 41 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Bringing back the prudish Victorian era?

[–] Prior_Industry@lemmy.world 17 points 10 hours ago

I could actually imagine Starmer flustered by the sight of an ankle.

[–] cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 14 points 8 hours ago

100 members of the lords vs one adguard filter

[–] leftzero@lemmy.dbzer0.com 28 points 11 hours ago

Seems more reasonable to put UK-blocking systems on them...

[–] toebert@piefed.social 16 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

They're doing their part in UK politics. Tories stole everything they could and drove it all into the ground until everyone got sick and elected labour. Now they're raising taxes to put money back in and doing everything they can to make sure they're hated enough that there is no chance they get re-elected. Then, Tories can just walk back in and take all the money coming in from the new taxes again. It's a beautiful cycle of the general population getting fucked from both sides.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›