this post was submitted on 14 Dec 2025
804 points (98.2% liked)

People Twitter

8765 readers
1105 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician. Archive.is the best way.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 days ago

I'm locking this. I removed an entire thread of comments because I understand how both sides could think they're right and it's getting reported. No one is banned.

[–] Sturgist@lemmy.ca 151 points 5 days ago (2 children)

The actual last thing you see before leaking state secrets...

[–] JohnAnthony@lemmy.dbzer0.com 25 points 4 days ago

"lul not like you losers have any actual clearance"

[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 55 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Lies. Last thing you see is a WarThunder forum comment claiming that the radar cross section of a F-22 is about the size of a golfball, and you know for a fact that in most directions, it has a radar cross section comparable with a bumble bee.

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 11 points 4 days ago (2 children)

At this point there's no way the dev team of war thunder is anything but spies.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 279 points 5 days ago (31 children)

Wait... that doesn't look like the war thunder forums...

[–] baines@lemmy.cafe 78 points 5 days ago

jokes on her, the intel she’s digging for i leaked on war thunder already

load more comments (30 replies)
[–] BilSabab@lemmy.world 85 points 5 days ago (2 children)

that actually happened to one of my acquaintances a couple of years ago. hooked up with some girl at drone convention and she got arrested shortly afterwards for spying. he saw none of it - just got informed later on that he was about to get the honeypot treatment due to his work. dude was so scared he went ballistic on his digital footprint and won't even talk to you if there's any mic'ed device in his vicinity. if i ever saw a man "scared shitless" that was it

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Delphia@lemmy.world 50 points 5 days ago

If she thinks I'm not atleast seeing the tiddies before I commit treason she has another thing coming.

[–] TachyonTele@piefed.social 109 points 5 days ago (5 children)

I already leaked. She just doesn't know.

[–] FosterMolasses@leminal.space 36 points 5 days ago (2 children)

The worst part is when they're girl-next-door natural beauties like this.

Your brain can say no to an obvious escort/Victoria secret model suspect, but when your animal brain starts shutting down your frontal lobe with "Oh my god, she's the one!!" malware you're screwed lmao

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] OpenPassageways@programming.dev 30 points 4 days ago

"SecWarCrimes has invited you to a Signal chat"

[–] Randelung@lemmy.world 31 points 5 days ago

I'm in the wrong industry.

[–] Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca 24 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Jokes on her, most of my country's military resources haven't been updated since the Boer War.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world 13 points 4 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] qarbone@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago

Damn, I should learn some state secrets to leak.

[–] jaschen306@sh.itjust.works 34 points 5 days ago

That's weird. That doesn't look like a Signal chat.

[–] hansolo@lemmy.today 69 points 5 days ago (4 children)

The irony being all the Defense contractors on here that upvoted, saying "heh, boobs do be like that," and there's some website that tracks who votes how on Lemmy, thus revealing a short list of maybes.

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 17 points 5 days ago

Oh no, I made a terrible mistake and upvoted the post multiple times. Now they'll definitely go after me :(

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 30 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (4 children)
[–] yopyop@sh.itjust.works 16 points 4 days ago (2 children)

So this means I can safely date her ? I'm relieved, thanks !

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] assembly@lemmy.world 60 points 5 days ago

She can have them.

[–] _Nico198X_@europe.pub 29 points 5 days ago (4 children)

what's to stop one from benefiting from the honey pot, but feeding them false information?

[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 35 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I used to work for a large defense contractor as a consultant. The best way to damage China would have been to let the spies see everything and hope they implemented the same fucked-up shit over there.

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 20 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Describe the technical specifics of your job in a way that misleads them as to the actual information you're working with, but that won't be immediately obvious to an expert that's potentially even more familiar with the source material you're working with than you are.

It's just hard to keep that kind of lie going - it's not impossible, but fooling someone with an entire intelligence agency requires a whole lot of both luck and planning.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] thespcicifcocean@lemmy.world 19 points 5 days ago (1 children)

apparently counterintel is really hard to do, according to some other lemmy comment i read before somewhere.

[–] BilSabab@lemmy.world 17 points 5 days ago

it is case-dependent. not every honeypot operation is about gaining intelligence. some are just to discredit someone.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] blazeknave@lemmy.world 45 points 5 days ago (4 children)

Had a Russian woman way too into me at the bar during RSA. Maybe I was being paranoid but I bailed.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] pedz@lemmy.ca 17 points 4 days ago (2 children)

And then the twelve colonies are destroyed in a surprise attack.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] titanicx@lemmy.zip 4 points 3 days ago

I would give up whatever secret she wants.

[–] slothrop@lemmy.ca 33 points 5 days ago

Sexretary of War

[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 20 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Context? And also, would. Totally would. 😍

[–] thespcicifcocean@lemmy.world 26 points 5 days ago (4 children)

the original honey pot. basically, an attractive person from a geopolitical foe country feigns interest in you (sometimes involves sex) and gets you to divulge secrets that they then pass on to their handlers.

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 20 points 5 days ago

this has been the most effective espionage since forever

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›