this post was submitted on 14 Dec 2025
686 points (94.9% liked)

Greentext

7467 readers
1046 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AlexisFR@jlai.lu 1 points 3 hours ago

They should not be paying much taxes at such a low salary.

[–] JuliaSuraez@lemmy.world 9 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

The killer is volatility—irregular hours + fixed bills = constant crisis mode.

[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

This is killing me in a different way.

Weekly pay for monthly bills.

Most of my bills land between the 10th and 20th of the month, which means I have to set aside and reserve money from my other paycheques to cover that range.

I am bad at doing so.

[–] Bassman1805@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

If you can afford $9/mo, YNAB (You Need A Budget) is a great app for managing income and expenses that don't necessarily align on a calendar schedule.

I get that budgeting won't make up for insufficient income, but if it's actually the financial habits that are holding you back, this app works wonders for learning how to properly plan your expenses.

If you're into open source stuff and are willing to spend more effort tinkering, ActualBudget is the same concept, but lacks some QoL features (notably, auto-importing transactions from your bank/credit card statements).

[–] uncouple9831@lemmy.zip 2 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

I know it's fake and gay, but anon should be able to get "cheapest possible" internet at $45/mo and soft unlimited data on cell for $20/mo. Nationwide.

Given their rent is the ridiculously low $750, the $90/mo in gas seems excessive too, although their insurance (esp if you assume <25yo given the source) is almost unbelievable. That's like 2000s numbers, or super super rural which might explain the gas.

[–] MutilationWave@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I rent a small house in West Virginia for $750. I'm five minutes from downtown in the capital city, fifteen minutes from the only decentish airport in the state. It's possible.

[–] uncouple9831@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Oh yeah the 750 I believe, it's just super cheap. West VA makes sense. $90 for gas would make more sense to me in the western liberal states with high gas tax and even higher rent. Doesn't make as much sense to me if your rent is 750.

[–] halvar@lemy.lol 1 points 4 hours ago

Why do we pay taxes before we pay for rent? If the government won't provide housing at least they could be nice and not ask for their cut before we get that done.

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 113 points 1 day ago (11 children)

Dog whistling bullshit. "Obongo", "waahh socialised medicine is the reason i'm trapped in a poverty spiral" get faaarked

[–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 5 points 4 hours ago

The ACA is not socialized medicine. It is health insurance reform and only partial at that.

Also, I don't agree that "Obongo" is a dog whistle. It is so openly racist no one is going to miss it.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 2 points 5 hours ago

Yep, at that point I just said "Suffer MAGA, you voted for this."

[–] DamnianWayne@lemmy.world 15 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

It's 4Chan, "Obongo" is one of the more polite names they could say.

Obamacare is corporate medicine, designed to give more money to the health insurance industry. Anyone in support of socialized medicine should not be a fan of it just because it's marginally better than before.

[–] freddydunningkruger@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

Democrats tried to offer a single payer option. However, EVERY SINGLE REPUBLICAN voted against it, and as a result, it was possible for two Democrats, Dick Durbin and Joe Lieberman, to vote against it and force the removal of Single Payer and the Public Option from the bill.

And as a result, we get the BOTH SIDES SAME bullshit. Republicans stand firm and vote 100% against a bill, making it possible for 1 or 2 Democrats to derail it, and as a result, people get mad at Democrats as a whole and ensure Republicans keep getting enough seats to keep this strategy alive.

What's amazing is how well this works for Republicans. So many idiots in the world.

[–] abbotsbury@lemmy.world 12 points 17 hours ago (6 children)

Obamacare isn't perfect and made some things more expensive for some people. Yes it helped others and overall I think it's beneficial, but covering your ears and pretending that anon is blaming socialized medicine entirely is just inaccurate.

Criticism, when factual, is good.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 5 points 5 hours ago

He called it "obongocare." He isn't operating in good faith.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 13 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Schedules one hour under benefits have been a feature for a lot longer than Obamacare.

[–] abbotsbury@lemmy.world 6 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

yes, which would make this specific criticism of Obamacare nonfactual, but anon is still not blaming socialized medicine like the person I replied to thinks

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 4 points 14 hours ago

Anyone using the word Obongo to refer to Obama does not make that distinction. Anything left of YOYO plans is socialized healthcare to them.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Jolteon@lemmy.zip 25 points 22 hours ago (3 children)

To be fair, the requirement to provide health insurance and other benefits for full-time workers is definitely one of the leading causes of the reduction in full-time jobs. If lawmakers were really putting the peoples' interests first, they would have just said that for a part-time job the employer would have to provide benefits based on the fraction of 40 hours the employee worked (e.g. 20 hours is half-benefits).

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 39 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

Look I'll be honest with you. As someone outside the US the idea that your workplace is responsible for your private insurance / healthcare is bug fuck insane and open to exploitation on a mind boggling scale.

[–] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 7 points 16 hours ago

Look at it like this: in America, a sizeable portion of people think that your direct economic utility is a good measure of if you deserve to live. They'll justify it by saying things like "they don't think it's governments place" to provide social services, and that it's better handled through charity.
If you don't have a workplace you need to go for real American style socialized medicine: GoFundMe.

(The history behind it is that before anyone was really doing socialized healthcare workplaces in the US started offering health insurance as a way to increase compensation during the WW2 wage freezes. Eventually it was so pervasive that it was a recognized form of compensation, and then it was the easiest way to dictate that everyone had insurance, since a lot of people listened to the fear mongering that was going on. "Nothing changes you just can't get kicked off for developing cancer". It also lined up with the beliefs of those who think that people who aren't working don't deserve support)

[–] MrVilliam@sh.itjust.works 13 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Not just open to exploitation; openly exploited. Disruption to coverage and questions about what could be covered differently are significant factors that cause people to choose not to take a job elsewhere.

The trick is that health insurance can be bought directly, but it's just so insanely expensive to do it that way so nobody does. Companies get a huge discount to buy bulk enterprise packages, and then their employees pay for a lot of it themselves. The portion that the company pays for is just an expense of labor, the same as salary, and offering better than the company across the street is an incentive to get better hires.

The ACA basically was just "hey, you know that discount that companies are getting? Now do it for the state and we'll offer it to everybody. And insurance companies will like it because people are given incentive to buy this because we're gonna fine people for not being insured." Pretty shitty deal, but at least people had the freedom to jobhop or become unemployed and keep their doctors.

It's cheaper and easier to buy a gun than to get an abortion in this shithole country.

[–] LH0ezVT@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 hours ago

Classic US capitalism: Take a product, triple the price, and then offer a generous 50% discount if you sign up on unfavourable terms.

But yeah, I guess I am preaching to the choir here.

[–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 22 points 20 hours ago

If lawmakers were really putting the peoples' interests first, they'd pass socialized medicine

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›