this post was submitted on 13 Dec 2025
539 points (98.0% liked)

politics

26740 readers
2384 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Sweeping Democratic victories in off-year elections seem to be foreshadowing a very good midterms for the party, and one expert believes it’s even bigger than that.

“This is a once-in-a-generation opportunity to fundamentally transform legislative power,” Heather Williams, president of the Democratic Legislative Campaign Committee (DLCC), which focuses on electing Democrats to statehouses, told Mother Jones.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] expatriado@lemmy.world 14 points 5 days ago (1 children)

every other year we got once in a generation elections

[–] n7gifmdn@lemmy.ca 4 points 5 days ago

I fell like Every American presidential election in my life has been advertised as the most important of all time.

[–] DaMummy@lemmy.world 13 points 5 days ago (2 children)

"Your father and I support the jobs the comet will provide"

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] caboose2006@lemmy.world 11 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Too bad the leadership are feckless losers.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 4 points 5 days ago

They are paid to be so.

[–] Rhoeri@lemmy.world 10 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

So, you guys remember when we had the “once-in-a-generation” chance to stand in the way of a fascist Hitler-wannabe criminal of a dictator?

We had one party that actually wanted this, another that couldn’t be bothered to do enough to distance themselves from it- and an unbelievable ninety one million dipshits that were fine with allowing either to dictate the results.

Never underestimate an American’s penchant for exerting less than the bare minimum of effort- even when it’s in their own best interest to do so.

[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

This is better than my take. Have an upvote!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] fossilesque@mander.xyz 4 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (5 children)

They need to give us something to fight for first. The system is not currently supporting and nourishing it's children. Why on earth would we trust people to help that can't even fully recognise a genocide? How do we trust them to give us healthcare? It's an insult to the intelligence of the American people.

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

agreed, the new wedge issues havent dropped yet.
Who knows what they will tell us to think about for this round, so excited.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 5 days ago

Time to have a bad candidate in the "once in a life time" election from the Dems again so Trump gets his illegal 3rd term. Can't have a popular candidate, they might raise taxes on the rich and lower them on the poor.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 6 points 5 days ago (2 children)

@But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world re: https://lemmy.world/comment/20954304

Do all the comments in this thread sound like Russian propaganda too? Or are there perhaps valid criticisms of the Democrat party?

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 4 days ago

There are way too many people who think any criticism is desire to make the dems better is nothing but outside influence.

Especially when pointing out the flaws or failures

Still at this you weirdo stalker?

I'm sure they'll snatch defeat from the jaws of victory again, or squander the opportunity to make real gains with any win.

[–] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 5 days ago

Never underestimate Democrats' ability to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory.

[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Lol. Really? The last time they had a choice between a tepid mid candidate and an impeached, convicted piece of literal rapist shit and they chose to let the rapist shit into the office. I don't have high hopes, tbh. The voters would rather virtue signal than get off their fat asses to save their country.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

To find the cloud in the silver lining, I can easily see how this doesn't happen.

Currently we are outraged at ICE and military in our streets inflicting harm on innocents, nervous about getting in a war no one would have even thought of, suffering from tariffs increasing prices and ACA premiums going way up.

The thing about every single one of those is that Republicans caused them and Republicans can mostly fix them. Simply by undoing the things they caused in the first place makes folks feel like things are getting fixed, and many will forget why they were broken and just be focused on how they got better during the election year.

So I expect immigration enforcement to tone down (already saw a story to that effect), for them to manage a last minute ACA subsidy extension with much drama, pulling back a lot of tariffs, and chilling out on Venezuela for 2026. Going extra by cutting some "tariff fund" checks and some HSA deposits, to make sure the people get some money, even if it is smaller than the money lost, people fall for "windfalls". Maybe throw some folks under the bus like RFK Jr and Hegseth, to drain the swamp so to speak.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

It's a possibility for sure but it leans on the idea of a sudden surge of 1) competence and 2) congress and scotus reeling in the presidential power

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›