this post was submitted on 13 Dec 2025
180 points (97.9% liked)

Fuck AI

4917 readers
1735 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Darkcoffee@sh.itjust.works 99 points 6 days ago (2 children)

If I was governor I'd do it anyway. EOs are not decrees

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 62 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Just scream "states rights" and ignore the fed. Works for fascism.

[–] snooggums@piefed.world 35 points 6 days ago (1 children)

This isn't even a state's rights issue. Executive orders are just memos for the federal executive branch, not laws or decrees or anything that has any weight beyond 'this is how we will enforce the laws already passed'.

The states should just say 'that isn't how executive orders work' instead of pretending that there is some federal vs state issue.

[–] fodor@lemmy.zip 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)

States don't need to say anything. The executive order is weightless. State law trumps executive orders automatically. The states will just go on with life, their laws are still laws.

[–] snooggums@piefed.world 5 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

They should absolutely speak up and say that the order means nothing to the states. Silence is consent when the news is acting like it means something.

[–] Jason2357@lemmy.ca 20 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Not even remotely within the prevue of an EO. Its a show so that he can rail against those states insolence.

[–] PumaStoleMyBluff@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

Wasting state AG's time so they can't do anything actually productive

[–] DickFiasco@sh.itjust.works 83 points 6 days ago

Isn't it just a bit suspicious that the industry is preemptively asking for deregulation? It's like they know they're going to do some shady shit and want to make sure no pesky laws get in the way.

[–] danielquinn@lemmy.ca 55 points 6 days ago (2 children)

But... "states' rights!"

I keep waiting for Republicans to revolt, but then I remember they're Republicans.

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 17 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

If they possessed actual virtues, morals, or ethics, they wouldn't be conservatives.

[–] TrippyHippyDan@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

If it's not about being racist, sexist, or overly religious then states don't get rights apparently.

[–] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 22 points 6 days ago

The party of states' rights and fiscal conservatism never was.

[–] EnsignWashout@startrek.website 12 points 6 days ago

When the law no longer pretends to serve the people, it loses a big part of it's social power.

Many people in power today don't seem to really understand the nature of power.

[–] Mulligrubs@lemmy.world 10 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Remember, this is what they are doing publicly, right out in the open.

We have a black budget system where rule of law doesn't matter... AI is already killing people, controlling warbots, and more. If we are very, very lucky, we'll know the "truth" in 50 years or so.

Do you know what the CIA did after FOIA became a problem? They burned the vast majority of records, with the tidbits they "missed" being truly horrifying. I personally think it was a message, the message being "Abandon all hope, ye who enter here".

[–] Jollyllama@lemmy.world 15 points 6 days ago

Where are the Libertarians now?

[–] BetaBlake@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago

The "states rights" people will just ignore this PR move like they do with everything else he does.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago

So that title is technically false. Executive Orders apply to the operation of the federal government only, Trump has not blocked anything.

Trump signed an order which claims to be blocking. Trump attempted blocking.