this post was submitted on 12 Dec 2025
987 points (98.9% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

36031 readers
3753 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] aeternum@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 17 hours ago

imagine believing in such a hateful ideology. I'd be ashamed to say i am christian.

[–] BonesOfTheMoon@lemmy.world 8 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

I'm a practicing Christian and go to church every week. I also think homophobes are shitheads who don't deserve the love and mercy of God.

The biblical scholar Walter Bruggeman wrote a great essay on the interpretation of homophobic biblical verses that is really good (https://outreach.faith/2022/09/walter-brueggemann-how-to-read-the-bible-on-homosexuality/).

But also just plain old have some common sense that the people of the ancient world didn't have the same insight we do into human attraction and sexuality, and we can grow and evolve and know better. Also, even if you don't agree with people being queer, you also have the ability to shut your mouth about it and keep it to yourself, and be the loving Christian you profess to be no matter what your personal beliefs are, and you have no right to tell people who to love, period.

[–] CtrlAltDefeat@lemmy.zip 3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Why do you practice a religion that requires any practicioner to interpret these abhorrent texts in their own manner? It just leaves a lot of room to interpret anything the wrong way. And unsurprisingly, some people will interpret this in a homophobic way, and honestly, I can't blame them. The texts themselves are just wrong and shouldn't be preached.

[–] krooklochurm@lemmy.ca -1 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Because they're a fucking idiot that believes magic people come back from the dead and that some vaguely sapient being created the entire vastness of the infinite universe with its mind boggling complexity, and sent another magic person to earth to help humanity, and that instead of offering actual help, like, you know, telling people that mold kills bacteria, he just said a bunch of shit about love that can easily be misinterpreted.

Seriously, if Jesus had just taught people about penicillin and then died he'd have done infinitely more good and infinitely less harm than he did.

All that idiotic, steaming horse shit in the bible and not one fucking sliver of insight into the nature of the fucking world. Not one.

[–] ryan213@lemmy.ca 3 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

Does the majority of your congregation share your opinion as well?

[–] BonesOfTheMoon@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago

Everyone does, and we have some queer and trans congregants too. Our official position is that we welcome all queer people in every way. Actually a bunch of people at another church left and joined us because that church came out as non-affirming of queer people.

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Probably depends on which version of Christianity they go with

[–] Ougie@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Which version of Christianity do you consider to be more accepting?

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 3 points 17 hours ago

Most of the non American ones

meanwhile they ignore that King David was gay in the bible. like super gay with no heterosexual interpretation possible.

[–] Stern@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

1 Timothy 2:12 I do not permit a woman to teach or to assume authority over a man; she must be quiet.

Context- https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=1+Timothy+2%3A11-15&version=NIV

[–] yermaw@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I need a few more verses like this in my arsenal. I don't want people citing religious texts at me for how to live my life, Ive read like 5% of the/a christian bible and zero of the others. I don't agree as a concept, might as well be quoting star wars at me, but if they insist on fighting with the book its nice to have ways to win with the book.

[–] cyberwitch@reddthat.com 5 points 23 hours ago

Try Psalm 137 on for size. 8 O daughter of Babylon, doomed to be destroyed, Blessed shall he be who repays you with what you have done to us! 9 Blessed shall he be who takes your little ones and dashes them against the rocks!

Hosea 1 is wild: 8 "And when [Gomer the harlot] weaned No Mercy (And I thought Tragedeigh was a bad name for a girl!), she conceived and bore a son. 9 And the Lord said," Call his name Not my People, for you are not my people, and I am not your God.

Also if fundies claim that the husband leads the wife like God leads the church, Hosea 2 gives a good idea of what "Godly husbandmanship" looks like.

And of course, Leviticus is full of all kinds of "fun” things to have as soundbites, like humiliation rituals for menstruation or" suspected" infidelity, when a rapist can marry his victim, and how badly you can beat a slave before you get into trouble for it.

[–] SethTaylor@lemmy.world 3 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

In the UK it's "A man who Walkers with another man"

[–] CIA_chatbot@lemmy.world 106 points 1 day ago (15 children)
[–] Glide@lemmy.ca 93 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Of course it was. Of course Christianity took a line intended to protect children from abuse and "mistranslated" it to be homophobic.

[–] docoptix@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Well it is also very important for Christians that molesting boys is just "oopsies" but not gay.

[–] Asidonhopo@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Considering how in the original Greek text of the New Testament the Apostles were all described as being between 10 and 19 years of age hanging out with 30-something year old Jesus, and how Jesus' crucifixion was a result of him being caught in the middle of the night in the Garden of Gesthemane (Mark 14:51-52) with a naked boy, yeah I'd say they have a complicated relationship with gay molestation of the underage.

Certainly not the mainstream view taught in church but classical philologist Dr. Ammon Hillman has the receipts.

[–] Rcklsabndn@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago

I mean, Jesus has limitless love, right?

[–] MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world 1 points 21 hours ago

It's less about it being gay that's the problem than the fact that it's an unspeakably horrific crime.

Intentionally covering for pedophiles, in my mind, removes any shred of credibility for the "moral guidance" offered by said organization. I was raised Catholic but I think even if I hadn't become irreligious as I am now, I would still shun the Catholic church for a denomination less insanely corrupt and evil.

[–] MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Can't really pretend that it's not interpreted that way by some Jewish people. Not Reformed but certainly among the Orthodox.

[–] axexrx@lemmy.world 47 points 1 day ago

Iirc, the hebrew word that gets translated to 'lay' is also a pretty suspect translation. Its only other usage in the OT (and our only other known context for it) is to describe a man pursuing his wife's servant, and contextually, is more likely to mean 'molest' or 'rape' than to describe consensual sex.

The 2 words translated to 'man' are also different- the first being 'ish' the second being 'zachar'

While both can generally refer to anyone male, ish can be used in the context of 'anyone', or 'husband/ man of the house', whereas Zachar is often used biblically to refer to young males, and /or subordinates.

So put together, this passage is likely 'nobody should be molesting boys,' or 'a master shouldn't rape his servants or children'

[–] cyberwitch@reddthat.com 2 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

A lot of scholars point out that homosexuality wasn't really a concept in the ancient world. Neither was marriage for love or anything other than a means to perpetuate genes and familial property. But what was very much a concept was machismo. Being a "bottom" (in different terms back then) was considered degrading and "womanly," and that was typically the issue at hand, according to many scholars, such as DanMcClellan, Robert Alter, and Jerome Walsh.

[–] a_non_monotonic_function@lemmy.world 3 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Have they not hear about power bottoms?

[–] cyberwitch@reddthat.com 1 points 10 hours ago

Like electricity and central heating, they hadn't made that discovery yet

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] HappySkullsplitter@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago (3 children)

The Bible is open to interpretation

[–] MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

And translation issues. Words and meaning can change a lot when something is translated. Leviticus went from Hebrew to Greek to Latin to English (and most other modern languages of course).

[–] buttnugget@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I believe that line was originally written as “man shall not lie with boys” and is about pedophilia, not homosexuality.

[–] MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Nah, it was about the sinfulness of sharing Lays brand potato chips

You can share the chips but you can't grow the potatoes.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] GladiusB@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I interpret it as a mid fantasy book. The epilogue is fucking boring as hell.

[–] Asidonhopo@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The modern translation is a fairytale but if you get into the original Greek bible texts and supporting and opposing texts from Greco-Roman civilization it paints a very interesting picture of the corruption of the ancient world into the situation we call Western Civilization today. Hopeful eras where humanity improved like the Renaissance and the American Revolutionary War were in large part due to study and reemergence of pre-Christian pagan ideas from Greek antiquity.

[–] Rcklsabndn@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago

This sounds like interesting material.

Any books out there that compare and contrast? I'm curious, but not enough to possess two different Bibles.

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Question: does fucking a parallel universe self count as being gay? Does it count as incest? Self-cest?

What about fucking yourself from an hour ago through time travel? Are you double-gay? Does that means you can use a Uno +2 card on the catholic priest?

[–] FatVegan@leminal.space 5 points 1 day ago

Masturbation is incest, i die on that hill

[–] MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

That just sounds like masturbation with extra steps

[–] glorkon@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago

Of course Christians are absolutely fine with people being gay.

After all, they're the ones down on their knees hoping for a man to come for the second time.

[–] undergroundoverground@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

And God, despite being male presenting, identifies as non-binary. Per them/thier own words, God created at least three genders.

load more comments
view more: next ›