this post was submitted on 12 Dec 2025
-11 points (33.3% liked)

No Stupid Questions

44787 readers
346 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It doesn't take that much energy and power to run an LLM or an image generator, and sure, it would take a lot with so many users connecting, across so many servers... but there's just no way they're not mining bitcoin. My math might not be mathing but it seems like AI doesn't justify the power use and it seems like everybody's lying.

Someone who knows more about this inform me of your opinions

top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Nollij@sopuli.xyz 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Bitcoin mining doesn't normally use GPUs. They use dedicated ASICs. Far more effective, and cheaper in every way.

In addition, AI is in the "growth at any cost" phase. There is a TON of investor money to burn, with little need to show future profitability.

[–] umbrellacloud@leminal.space 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If that’s the case, why don’t they pull the Renaissance artist scam and just take a bunch of money and swear they’re working on stuff? If they don’t have to prove anything, why use any energy at all?

[–] Nollij@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Little need, but not no need. They need to have a vague path, and something to show for it.

[–] umbrellacloud@leminal.space 1 points 1 day ago

A vague path and something to show for it means using a bunch of energy for something they're not even really doing...?

[–] JakenVeina@lemmy.world 18 points 3 days ago

The big power use is in building/training models, not running them. Not the running them is insignificant either.

[–] deafboy@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

always ask:

  1. How many people would have to be in on it?
  2. How likely is it for everybody to keep the secret?
[–] howrar@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

And also ask: do they gain anything from lying about it?

[–] umbrellacloud@leminal.space 1 points 2 days ago

I mean… yeah. It’s always beneficial for people not to know how much money one has… I can’t really imagine a situation where it wouldn’t be.

[–] sbeak@sopuli.xyz 10 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Running LLMs do take a lot of power. Trying to run a very small model on my old laptop makes the fans go crazy and power draw must be high given that it gets very hot. Then when you get models with billions upon billions of parameters, you can see how it all adds up. Then you multiply these humongous models with millions of users, as well as consider all the energy required to cool all those servers (fans, pumps, etc).

The biggest power draw in the AI industry is probably training the models, given that it's quite literally going through the entire internet for every crumb of data and mixing it all together into coherent text and images. Then you see how power grids can be taken down by these power hungry data centers.

[–] sbeak@sopuli.xyz 2 points 3 days ago (2 children)

If you have seen any videos of people visiting these data centers, you can hear the incredibly loud fans that make it difficult to hear the presenter speaking.

[–] CameronDev@programming.dev 5 points 3 days ago

Thats true of all datacenters though, not just AI. 1RU fans are just crazy noisy.

[–] ShellMonkey@piefed.socdojo.com 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Start with he premise that energy is not created or destroyed, it only changes state. Pushing processors to perform a task uses energy and creates heat to rearrange numbers and pixels. Combing through huge numbers of data vits takes a lot of energy. If you've ever worked with systems larger than a desktop you know how much they can draw.

My whole home lab uses about 700 watts for basic server duties. To power a single 3090 GPU to run some larger models my PC needed a 1000 watt PSU. Extrapolate that out to a commercial size org and you can see where the major power draw comes in.

[–] umbrellacloud@leminal.space 1 points 2 days ago

That makes sense.

[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

They are both a waste of power. Just because one is less of a waste doesn't make it a good choice.

[–] umbrellacloud@leminal.space 3 points 2 days ago

I didn't say it was a good choice, not sure I made any kind of statement you could nitpick or impose judgement upon me for, and if I did, I edited it out because I predicted you being insufferable. "I think they're mining bitcoin" is not the exact same statement as "bitcoin is good" or "AI is good." I don't actually mind either bitcoin or AI, I think like alcohol they're fine in moderation, but that's not what my post is about.