this post was submitted on 12 Dec 2025
860 points (94.6% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

43192 readers
969 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that. Please post actually infuriating posts to !actually_infuriating@lemmy.world

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating. If your post better fits !Actually_Infuriating put it there.

-The Community !actuallyinfuriating has been born so that's where you should post the big stuff.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.


-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Sgt_choke_n_stroke@lemmy.world 60 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

"The guards were on the river bank to make sure the poor didn't take the fruit from the river, when that was too expensive it was collected in a pile and doused in kerosene. The hogs were burned as well all for the sake of profit" -grapes of wrath

I honestly think about it to this day. We didn't give milk to the homeless during covid. Farmers dumped it all for profit. We don't grow food to feed We gro food to make profit.

[–] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 12 points 16 hours ago

Came to the comments just to make sure that passage was on top.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SomethingBurger@jlai.lu 42 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

So the rumors are true, good food is indeed illegal in the UK.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 7 points 20 hours ago

Yeah but it's also the daily mail who are reporting this so default assumptions.

[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 24 points 22 hours ago (3 children)

In their defense, the warning could just be a CYA thing if someone eats one, gets sick and wants to sue for food poisoning.

[–] FalschgeldFurkan@lemmy.world 10 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

That'd make sense, but they didn't warn about the possible consequences; they warn that you may be prosecuted

[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 5 points 16 hours ago

Because they have lawyers in retainer. They only speak one language. From their perspective, putting out a threading notice is the cheapest, easiest thing to do.

[–] VitoRobles@lemmy.today 14 points 20 hours ago

Excuse me. There's a sign at Ramsett Park that says "Do not drink the sprinkler water," so I made sun tea with it, and now I have an infection. Sir? Sir, are... are... are... are you listening to me, sir? Sir, I'm talking to you! Sir! Sir, are you aware that there is waste in your water system?

[–] zaperberry@lemmy.ca 6 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

That's probably the case, or at least a part of it, but it's crazy that it's gotten to that point. If somebody finds a food item in the wild and decides to eat it, the consequences should be 100% on them. It doesn't even have to apply to food, either.

If I find a block heater on the ground, install it into my car, and then my car catches fire; I'm not going to go after the manufacturer of the block heater. I'm the idiot who decided to do something stupid.

That being said there's real life cases which indicate that yes, people are stupid and will sue over their own stupidity, so I'm not surprised at all.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] kerrigan778@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 18 hours ago

Dailymail is not a reputable source.

[–] leftzero@lemmy.dbzer0.com 27 points 23 hours ago (5 children)

Got a loicense for that banana, mate?

[–] bhamlin@lemmy.world 4 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

I could've sworn the Australian word for banana was bendigo bendy...

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 4 points 20 hours ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] SlartyBartFast@sh.itjust.works 44 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Prosecuted for what? Enjoying a meal? A succulent, banana meal?

[–] ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Are they going to fight? I bet they know their judo well!

[–] hardcoreufo@lemmy.world 5 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

This is democracy manifest.

[–] Baylahoo@sh.itjust.works 2 points 18 hours ago

Get your hands off my penis, SIR!

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 63 points 1 day ago (5 children)

I don't know anything about British courts, but I doubt that any court is going to find anybody guilty of any major crime for collecting bananas washing up on the beach, for which the corporation that lost them got an insurance settlement to cover the loss. That's salvage, and salvage rights are long established.

[–] BossDj@piefed.social 2 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

While the coastguard was clear that they didn't mean the bananas

this does not include perishable goods like foodstuffs.

everyone here IS following maritime salvage law.

The "long established" rule is: the owner has all rights to the cargo and wreck, but must compensate those who assist in recovery only if the owner agrees to assistance

The British maritime law that keeps getting referenced here was put into place initially to ensure that people would be compensated completely when assisting.

Previously, when it was a raw 'handshake' agreement, there would be negotiations before helping which delayed assistance, or Party A would screw over Party B with a low-ball reward, or Party B would just nope out of the situation for fear of not getting reimbursed and risk of damaging their own property.

The shipping company in this situation asked for assistance and sent a list of missing stuff, especially since they were threatened with penalties for creating a hazardous waterway. If you find missing stuff, you report it, and the government knows already how much you should be compensated and makes sure you get it. In this case, the company wants their expensive refrigeration equipment.

I have no idea if they offer a reasonable amount, but this was the intent.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] False@lemmy.world 47 points 1 day ago (18 children)

Eating beach bananas sounds like a great way to get some kind of weird illness. It's not like there's a nearby banana tree that they could have come from. But maybe I'm just too accustomed to grocery stores

load more comments (18 replies)
[–] Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago

Nah, they were dumb enough to lose them, those bananas are fair game.

[–] ragingHungryPanda@piefed.keyboardvagabond.com 106 points 1 day ago (1 children)

this reminds me of the famous quote in the grapes of wrath

The works of the roots of the vines, of the trees, must be destroyed to keep up the price, and this is the saddest, bitterest thing of all. Carloads of oranges dumped on the ground. The people came for miles to take the fruit, but this could not be. How would they buy oranges at twenty cents a dozen if they could drive out and pick them up? And men with hoses squirt kerosene on the oranges, and they are angry at the crime, angry at the people who have come to take the fruit. A million people hungry, needing the fruit- and kerosene sprayed over the golden mountains. And the smell of rot fills the country. Burn coffee for fuel in the ships. Burn corn to keep warm, it makes a hot fire. Dump potatoes in the rivers and place guards along the banks to keep the hungry people from fishing them out. Slaughter the pigs and bury them, and let the putrescence drip down into the earth.

There is a crime here that goes beyond denunciation. There is a sorrow here that weeping cannot symbolize. There is a failure here that topples all our success. The fertile earth, the straight tree rows, the sturdy trunks, and the ripe fruit. And children dying of pellagra must die because a profit cannot be taken from an orange. And coroners must fill in the certificate- died of malnutrition- because the food must rot, must be forced to rot. The people come with nets to fish for potatoes in the river, and the guards hold them back; they come in rattling cars to get the dumped oranges, but the kerosene is sprayed. And they stand still and watch the potatoes float by, listen to the screaming pigs being killed in a ditch and covered with quick-lime, watch the mountains of oranges slop down to a putrefying ooze; and in the eyes of the people there is the failure; and in the eyes of the hungry there is a growing wrath. In the souls of the people the grapes of wrath are filling and growing heavy, growing heavy for the vintage.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 236 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The cargo company should be prosecuted for littering. Unless they can convince some benevolent locals to go help them clean up the spill.

[–] ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works 80 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (7 children)

Members of the British government have been calling for strong efforts to ensure the shipping company and its insurers will pay the costs of the cleanup. Seatrade, which operates the vessel, said its insurers are fully engaged in the process, and in the meantime, volunteers are scouring the beaches, aiding in the cleanup (and possibly taking a few bananas home as a reward).

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] TrippingBalls@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago (10 children)

Fuck the bananas

I want the Cocaine washing up on the shores

[–] leftzero@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

Fuck the bananas

No, that's also illegal.

[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 4 points 20 hours ago

Is it? Dang can't fuck shit in the UK.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] MightyThistle@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago

I'm gonna go there, eat as many free bananas as I can because wasting food is ew, and use my glowing radioactive body to fuel a sweet rave beach party

[–] menas@lemmy.wtf 4 points 20 hours ago

I hope they will sue seagull as well

[–] TheEighthDoctor@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 day ago

Doesn't salvage law allow to take the bananas? Or does it not apply anymore If they wash ashore?

[–] ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This reminds me of when a large whiskey distillery broke in 19th century Ireland and many people died. Not from large quantities of alcohol sweeping people away (something like that happened in London in the early 19th century) but from passerby drinking so much of the stuff they died of alcohol poisoning.

Most Irish way to die ever!

[–] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 1 points 15 hours ago

something like that happened in London in the early 19th century

There was also a molasses flood in Boston in 1919

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Molasses_Flood?useskin=vector

[–] unphazed@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago

This is to keep people safe. Only those that have taken the Banana Self Defense class are certified for consumption of these bananas.

[–] cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 55 points 1 day ago (4 children)

british government more protective of bananas arriving on shore than they are refugees

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] nexguy@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

You need to leave alone the earthly process of food falling off container ships. It's nature's way.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 42 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Police, customs authorities, and the Receiver of Wrecks have warned beachcombers not to eat the bananas or to take them home.

This is the only mention in the linked article.

[–] Devial@discuss.online 35 points 1 day ago (5 children)

But the daily mail said it, it must be correct if the daily mail said it, they're such a reputable and neutral news organisation, they would never just make up wildly misleading, fear mongering click bait headlines.

Honestly, how anyone who can string more than two thoughts together would ever think the DM is a reputable source for a claim is a mystery to me.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›