this post was submitted on 11 Dec 2025
39 points (97.6% liked)

World News

1028 readers
319 users here now

Rules:
Be a decent person, don't post hate.

Other Great Communities:

Rules

Be excellent to each other

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 23 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

However, the US is nevertheless playing catch-up with its adversaries, and experts have previously told The Telegraph that it cannot compete on costs with countries like China, where labour costs are lower and regulations looser.

That isn’t why American weapons cost so much.

You’ve got a central planned government with access to the best manufacturing capabilities in the world competing with a profit driven handful of companies that have the US government by the balls.

Cutting wages and regulation won’t fix that, they know they can overcharge on every component the US buys.

Plus modern war is not like previous wars where it was difficult to project power. It’s easier now than ever for small weapons to bypass security and hit asymmetric targets. It’s essentially all attrition based, and having the most expensive gear is like the Japanese building Yamato class battleships in ww2. They were indefensible to air attack, so useless on the field. Modern aircraft carriers won’t stand up to fleets of cheap sea-born drones, especially when it costs 100x more to defend than produce.

[–] jacksilver@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

I think much like WWII, we have no idea what a war between two modern powers would actually look like.

Would one be able to take out the others satellites? Could either defend their factories from long range missiles? Could any country function for long without the global economy providing food/raw materials/etc.?

[–] rimu@piefed.social 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That is sobering.

But it sounds like that report / wargame is from the Biden administration, so it could be up to 4 years old. Since then the US has not been standing still and is deploying their first hypersonic systems now - https://www.armyrecognition.com/focus-analysis-conflicts/army/defence-security-industry-technology/exclusive-u-s-army-dark-eagle-deployment-in-2025-marks-u-s-entry-into-hypersonic-arms-race-with-china-and-russia

Even so, politically, it is questionable whether US would come to the aid of Taiwan, regardless of the military balance.

[–] cassandrafatigue@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The american military isn't made to fight wars, but to be welfare for shareholders. What little competency it retained is being dismantled under the trump admin as they disrespect logistics in favor of machismo and saw off their barrels to fight in american cities.

Not that they had a great record of winning wars before, but the US military is not in good shape.

[–] pixeltree@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 day ago

Hypersonic missles are a scam lol

[–] bluemoon@piefed.social 4 points 1 day ago

pfff grandstanding right?