This headline has been on repeat for all year.
this post was submitted on 11 Dec 2025
263 points (100.0% liked)
politics
26740 readers
2353 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
I had to triple-check the date when posting!
Department of Homeland Security spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin said in a social media post following the ruling, "This is naked judicial activism by an Obama appointed judge.
Another Maga harpy screaming about "judicial activism" while the corrupt Republican SCOTUS justices openly accept bribes, rewrite our laws, and ignore both 250 years of precedent and the Constitution.
Everything is projection with the GOP.
This time they will definitely listen!
Just start throwing department heads in jail for contempt until the orders are followed.
It's a great idea but complicated by the fact that the criminals are the ones controlling the law enforcement agencies responsible for enforcing that type of order. I wonder what the solution is. Can state agencies be used?
The court can technically deputize people and make a posse.
-
The court found that there is no lawful basis to deport Abrego in the first place, because the government was unable to produce a copy of the 2019 deportation order in court.
-
The court found that government lawyers deliberately "misled the tribunal" regarding their efforts to deport Abrego to Africa. The court "will take this into account" while considering pending motions for sanctions.
-
In alternative to #1, the court found that the government was not really detaining Abrego to deport him, because they could have sent him to Costa Rica at any time in the past few months. But they did not.
-
Therefore, there is no lawful reason to subject Abrego to immigration detention, and the writ of habeas corpus is granted.
-
Abrego is still on bail in the TN criminal case.
The government has sabotaged its purported objective by not taking the opportunity to deport him to Costa Rica when it had the chance. I suppose a country that has offered him asylum and residence, which he has indicated he would prefer to go to isn't cruel enough.
This is just absurd and the Abrego Garcia saga has been monstrously and cruelly handled at every step. If this is how the administration handles its flagship case — the one that turned into a media circus — imagine how they handle the tens of thousands of other cases.