this post was submitted on 11 Dec 2025
807 points (92.1% liked)

Political Memes

10019 readers
2313 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DempstersBox@lemmy.world 38 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (3 children)

when i was younger and stupid and in the (glass) closet i was dating the son of a pharmacologist. this man had made millions developing medications. he was fond of me and privately told me i was too funny and smart to be dating boys.

he also said that it was incredibly unlikely that sexism will ever be resolved in the medical field. that the majority of medications i will ever take - even some of which are "for women" - will not be clinically tested on my body.

the problem, he said, was in getting any human clinical trial approved.

to test on a body with a uterus - any body, even elderly patients or those who have been sterilized - was often nigh-impossible, because the concern was that the test patient may, at any point, become pregnant.

once/if the patient became pregnant, the study would not be about "the effects of New Medication on the body."

instead, the trial would fail - the results would be "the effects of New Medication on a developing fetus/pregnant patient."

it was massively easier, he said, to just test without accounting for a uterus.

that's how he phrased it - accounting for a uterus.

at the time, i remember him talking about the ethical implications of testing on a developing fetus; how such testing could theoretically bankrupt a company if a lawsuit was filed. he talked about informed consent and about how long it took for any legislation to be passed about this -

  • that in 1993; the year i was born, it finally became illegal to outright exclude women and minorities from clinical trials.

i remember him shrugging. "that's not to say it doesn't happen," he said. my ears were ringing.

i was thinking about how every time i have been rushed to the ER, the first thing they have asked me is if i am pregnant.

when i broke my wrist at 16 years old - despite never having had sex - they made me wait three hours for the test to come back negative before they gave me pain meds. the possibility of a child haunts my health.

how many people have died on the table because they were waiting for the pregnancy test before treatment.

how many people have died on the table because they were pregnant, and the only thing we care about is the fetus.

it is hard to explain to other people, but it feels like some kind of strange ghost. our entire lives, we are supposed to "save" our bodies for our future partners. but really we are just saving the body for the future child, aren't we? that hovering future-almost that cartwheels around in a miasma. you can't get your tubes tied, what if you change your mind? think of the child you must have, eventually. who cares about you and your actual safety. think about what you could be carrying.

[–] tetris11@feddit.uk 4 points 8 hours ago

jesus, that was a haunting read

[–] khaleer@sopuli.xyz 2 points 7 hours ago

how many people have died on the table because they were waiting for the pregnancy test before treatment.

You would be extremally disgusted hearing what happens in poland since 2020.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 2 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

women are also dismissed or outright ignored in the ER OR AT appointments, as having a period or being hysterical when they have serious symptoms of a disease.

[–] humorlessrepost@lemmy.world 12 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

Here in Tennessee, if I get a boner in public (fully clothed), it’s indecent exposure and I can be arrested.

That’s not the case in most states.

Granted, I doubt it’s a common issue, but I’m a nerd and saw a claim that’s technically wrong, so here I am.

[–] But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Technically laws change for men in every state, such as ones with legal cannabis or dry counties or even leash laws. But I get what the OP was saying

[–] RichardDegenne@lemmy.zip 3 points 8 hours ago

Yeah, you have to read it as "laws that apply specifically to men".

[–] QueenHawlSera@sh.itjust.works 1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

I have recently became cognizant of the fact that women, really aren't treated like people.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 6 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

all the anti-trans thing going is really about targeting women as well. since you rarely hear about anti-trans men.

[–] QueenHawlSera@sh.itjust.works 4 points 11 hours ago

I'm a transwoman who's just confronted her internalized misogyny

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 33 points 1 day ago

Yup.

We live in a country where if I get in the car with my girlfriend on the west coast and drive to the east coast, she gains and loses basic human rights multiple times before we reach our destination and nothing changes for me.

We can't even treat our women with respect. Trash nation. Full stop.

[–] Flickerby@lemmy.zip 124 points 1 day ago (62 children)

This is just blatantly false, men's rights do vary wildly state by state. I get what this is saying and I agree with the message but presenting a good message behind a lie doesn't make it any less of a lie.

load more comments (62 replies)
[–] ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online 30 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Unless those men are black, Hispanic, or neurodivergent.

[–] DempstersBox@lemmy.world 8 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

You realize those prejudices get compounded, right?

What's the name of that highway in canada, where they raped and murdered and dumped the corpses of native women?

Never a lead on any of those cases. I don't think one was male, but hey, maybe there were a couple

[–] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 5 points 10 hours ago

Indiginous men were taken on star light tours by the cops
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saskatoon_freezing_killings

[–] SinAdjetivos@lemmy.world 4 points 16 hours ago

Highway of tears, there have been several leads and several serial killers caught. The original list in 1980 included Larry Vu, Eric Charles Coss, and Phillip Innes Fraser but they were later removed after the "highway of tears" designation to focus exclusively on first nation women.

The lack of males is due primarily to the categorization, not the lack of victims.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] midtsveen@lemmy.wtf 7 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

MAGA Be Like: "Men", are supposed to use "women", to make "childred". "trans women" Can't do that, "trans women" bad

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 25 points 1 day ago (19 children)

Tell me that when we ban male genital mutilation.

load more comments (19 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›