this post was submitted on 10 Dec 2025
827 points (95.8% liked)

memes

18442 readers
2112 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 17 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The first one looks like a bottle, the second looks chubbier, and the third looks great.

Very effective demonstration, actually kind of impressive how successful it was.

[–] Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

She has different proportions in each picture. I can't tell if it was three different pictures, or they edited one picture and shaved down some spots depending on the dress.

[–] LemmyKnowsBest@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Yes in the third picture which we all think she looks the best, there's more space between her arms and her body than there are in the other two pictures. They definitely shaved down something so she's thinner in the third picture.

[–] KingPorkChop@lemmy.ca 68 points 3 days ago (3 children)
[–] Jimjim@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

Gj. Thanks for demonstrating this picture is bs.

[–] Nomorereddit@lemmy.today 11 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Not same pose. Look at the different size gaps between elbows and body.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 9 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (5 children)

When they said the same pose, they just mean they are front facing, arms to the side, as opposed to different positions for each dress. It's pretty darn close. She had to change dresses between shots, so the poses aren't going to be perfectly identical, but they are close enough to make the point that a person looks different depending on the stripes.

Do you really think that extra half inch of daylight between her arm and body somehow faked the result?

[–] Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 days ago (3 children)

The way to do this would be to edit the dress in Photoshop or similar. One picture, three designs and the model is the same in each.

Computer model with dress (e.g. Unreal Metahuman). Change the material but dimensions stay exactly equal.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Jimjim@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

Also the i think the different collars matters. Low No collar, high black collar, high no collar.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de 183 points 4 days ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] accideath@feddit.org 113 points 4 days ago (2 children)

They say horizontal stripes make you fat. But who tf eats horizontal stripes?

[–] MisterFrog@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

I personally think I use vertical stripes look the most fat

[–] deacon@lemmy.world 37 points 4 days ago (8 children)

Aren’t french fries horizontal stripes depending how you hold them?

[–] LaserTurboShark69@sh.itjust.works 29 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I should really start eating my fries vertically

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] elucubra@sopuli.xyz 37 points 4 days ago
[–] Nurse_Robot@lemmy.world 31 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Something feels manipulated about this, but it also feels like the author/photographer went out of their way to make sure you couldn't prove it was manipulated

[–] GreenShimada@lemmy.world 57 points 4 days ago (3 children)

What you're likely seeing as throwing you off is differences because this is an actual human wearing this - PLUS it's essentially an optical illusion. This isn't 3 versions of the same image with just the pattern changed. So yeah, these are actually not perfectly matching up if you overlay them on top of each other. I wouldn't say manipulated per se, just that they're 3 different images so they'll have some differences.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 23 points 3 days ago (5 children)

Yup.

So let's take the body/pose on the right, copy it to all three positions mask the dress only, and overlay only the dress pattern in the same mask to actually show the differences between the patterns only.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] ClamDrinker@lemmy.world 16 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

I agree with you, but if you measure the width of the dress at the tip of her fingers, the left and right are about 99-100 pixels, while the middle one is 105 pixels wide. Her face in all three images is about 38-39 pixels wide (measured at the earlobe), so that rules out they stretched the entire image slightly. But 5 pixels is significant enough to kind of muddy the validity of the OP's message since it no longer rules out all but the appearance of the dress. It sadly happens that sometimes effects are exaggerated, even when there is a real effect at play.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] rdri@lemmy.world 21 points 4 days ago

If you zoom in and measure distances in pixels you'll see it's manipulated.

[–] absentbird@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I think the biggest difference is the cut of the dress.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 7 points 3 days ago

Bingo

Look at the amount of visible background inside the elbows. They are each increasing in conforming the body as you move to the right.

[–] DearMoogle@piefed.social 48 points 4 days ago (6 children)

Brb tossing out any horizontal stripes I have left from my closet.

Wait what about flannel? The stripes are perpendicular, so would they cancel each other out?🤔

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 53 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

Horizontal lines are known to do that but I think the photos aren't equivalent either way. If you cover the dress up or shoulders down, the middle one has a bigger gap between her legs and wider face without being able to see the stripes from what I see.

[–] Master@sh.itjust.works 51 points 4 days ago

Loading it into an editor she has about an inch less per hip in the diagonal picture. Its pretty significant.

[–] DearMoogle@piefed.social 24 points 4 days ago

Ah I see it now. You can also tell by looking at the gap differences between her waist and arms.

[–] TonyTonyChopper@mander.xyz 3 points 2 days ago

The horizontal stripes look the best...

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] daannii@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (15 children)

Razzle dazzle camouflage!

I'm genuinely surprised so many people are familiar with this.

It's something talked about in perception courses/classes.

The lines make it difficult for humans and machines to accurately gauge depth perception.

For humans it's related to mach bands. And the way lateral inhibition works.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mach_bands https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lateral_inhibition&wprov=rarw1

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 4 points 2 days ago

I'm genuinely surprised so many people are familiar with this.

It's the Internet. By now, a lot of people have seen photos of those striped WWII ships.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 34 points 4 days ago

First one: I better watch out, she'll call a foul on me

Second one: I better watch out, she's probably a felon on the run

Third one: I can't watch out because I don't know where she is

[–] Smoogs@lemmy.world 15 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

It’s funny how they also represent an era. Vertical stripes=50s horizontal=90s/early 2000s, slanted =futurama

[–] hayvan@feddit.nl 2 points 2 days ago

I have trouble estimating her position, direction and velocity.

load more comments
view more: next ›