this post was submitted on 10 Dec 2025
350 points (98.1% liked)

Technology

77768 readers
2504 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

https://www.404media.co/man-charged-for-wiping-phone-before-cbp-could-search-it/

A man in Atlanta has been arrested and charged for allegedly deleting data from a Google Pixel phone before a member of a secretive Customs and Border Protection (CBP) unit was able to search it, according to court records and social media posts reviewed by 404 Media. The man, Samuel Tunick, is described as a local Atlanta activist in Instagram and other posts discussing the case. The exact circumstances around the search—such as why CBP wanted to search the phone in the first place—are not known. But it is uncommon to see someone charged specifically for wiping a phone, a feature that is easily accessible in some privacy and security-focused devices. 💡 Do you know anything else about this case? I would love to hear from you. Using a non-work device, you can message me securely on Signal at joseph.404 or send me an email at joseph@404media.co. The indictment says on January 24, Tunick “did knowingly destroy, damage, waste, dispose of, and otherwise take any action to delete the digital contents of a Google Pixel cellular phone, for the purpose of preventing and impairing the Government’s lawful authority to take said property into its custody and control.” The indictment itself was filed in mid-November. Tunick was arrested earlier this month, according to a post on a crowd-funding site and court records. “Samuel Tunick, an Atlanta-based activist, Oberlin graduate, and beloved musician, was arrested by the DHS and FBI yesterday around 6pm EST. Tunick's friends describe him as an approachable, empathetic person who is always finding ways to improve the lives of the people around him,” the site says. Various activists have since shared news of Tunick’s arrest on social media.

The indictment says the phone search was supposed to be performed by a supervisory officer from a CBP Tactical Terrorism Response Team. The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) wrote in 2023 these are “highly secretive units deployed at U.S. ports of entry, which target, detain, search, and interrogate innocent travelers.” “These units, which may target travelers on the basis of officer ‘instincts.’ raise the risk that CBP is engaging in unlawful profiling or interfering with the First Amendment-protected activity of travelers,” the ACLU added. The Intercept previously covered the case of a sculptor and installation artist who was detained at San Francisco International Airport and had his phone searched. The report said Gach did not know why, even years later. Court records show authorities have since released Tunick, and that he is restricted from leaving the Northern District of Georgia as the case continues. The prosecutor listed on the docket did not respond to a request for comment. The docket did not list a lawyer representing Tunick.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] toiletobserver@lemmy.world 153 points 1 week ago (3 children)

We should all have a digital self detonation button in case of overreaching small dicked incel fascists.

[–] Tangent5280@lemmy.world 78 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I object to your use of penis size as a derogative. I have the smallest dick on the planet but I haven't become a fascist yet.

[–] shittydwarf@piefed.social 32 points 1 week ago (3 children)
[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 2 points 5 days ago

With some difficulty, probably.

[–] BeatTakeshi@lemmy.world 41 points 1 week ago

Duh not with naked eye

[–] Tangent5280@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago

I can give you a probability density mapping in accordance to the Pauli Exclusion Principle

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] favoredponcho@lemmy.zip 152 points 1 week ago (13 children)

If it’s GrapheneOS, he may have given them the wipe code. You enter a passcode and it deletes everything. So, CBP may have done this. In any case, fuck em.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 55 points 1 week ago

Another story said he wiped it "using a code", so it sounds like that.

https://atlpresscollective.com/2025/12/05/samuel-tunick-atlanta-activist-arrest/

[–] mybuttnolie@sopuli.xyz 39 points 1 week ago (1 children)

instead of a destructive code, GOS should allow a code that will automatically open a secondary profile. wouldn't get the user in trouble

[–] favoredponcho@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 week ago
[–] MalMen@masto.pt 17 points 1 week ago

@favoredponcho @InternetCitizen2 I knew a guy that leaved the wipecode "hidden" in the phone case hoping that it would be entered without asking if someome took his phone

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] alpha1beta@piefed.social 76 points 1 week ago (1 children)

it should be my fucking right to to delete my data on my device at any time. Your lack of planning on your warrant doesn't constitute an emergency or wrong doing on my part.

[–] surph_ninja@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago

This is in Georgia. The state attorney general thinks it’s probable cause for arrest to not have a cellphone, or to have a dumb phone. They’re turning the state into a digital open air prison.

And just like cop city, this is a test for nationwide rollout.

https://georgiarecorder.com/2024/02/12/georgia-ag-claims-not-having-a-phone-makes-you-a-criminal/

[–] 1984@lemmy.today 67 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

I heard on the news today that the US is planning to force people visiting their ~~slave pen~~ country to show their social media history and 5 years of recent phone numbers. :)

They really dont want anyone coming there do they... :)

https://www.dw.com/en/us-demands-access-to-tourists-social-media-histories/a-75096949

[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 days ago

It was already in effect last year when I had to get an ETSA. They wanted my:

  • twitter account: don't have one
  • facebook account: don't have one
  • WhatsApp: don't have
  • Instagram: don't have
  • LinkedIn: OK, that I have
[–] llama@lemmy.zip 3 points 6 days ago

And what if people don't, are they going to look you up anyway to prove you lied? So if they can do that then what's the point?

[–] kokesh@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yes! What if they would find something in my history? That would be horrible! Something like Fuck you tRump, you orange clown. Pedophile president. Does he also paint his dick orange? Does he fuck bag of cheetos every morning? Charlie kirk was fucking racist. Something like this could popup in my social media history! Oh no!

[–] 1984@lemmy.today 15 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I think they are not even interested in any of that. Its just a method of control. Continuing to apply pressure to people, reminding them to bow down to authority.

They can already get the social media history from any big tech company. :)

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

They don't want foreigners in the US, looking healthy and fit and spending money while Americans are struggling to get by. And they don't want Americans visiting European countries where the standards of living are much higher than in the US. Americans might start getting the idea that they are getting the shit end of the stick.

[–] 1984@lemmy.today 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

I watched a very, very good video about this tonight actually. You may think its shit, since it requires kind of a belief in more than what ordinary people see in the system.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qjtvm82wGog

Just posting in case you appreciate it. Who knows.

[–] itisileclerk@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They are getting everything since always. That is why tech companies are getting so much money from government. Social media is a dream come true for US government.

[–] 1984@lemmy.today 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

I think they are all going further and further into madness. Us government and big tech together.

They dont seem to understand that themselves. The consciousness of wanting to control by force, in combination with big tech dystopian dreams of raising humans with Ai, and watching everybody in real time... Its a very strong difference in that kind of consciousness compared to a good person on this planet.

Ive lost interest in building technology solutions myself. Because its just about ads and control now. Its just the wrong kind of consciousness in charge of humanity. Tech isnt helping us, its making us more and more helpless and depressed.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 42 points 1 week ago

The indictment does not say anything more than what is quoted. I am wondering if this is because he deleted the contents after being told it would be searched or something

[–] Pika@sh.itjust.works 38 points 1 week ago (3 children)

The exact circumstances around the search—such as why CBP wanted to search the phone in the first place—are not known

until this isn't an unknown it's impossible to voice opinion on the legality of this action. If they had evidence that there was something incriminating or against the law on the device and can prove the user intentionally destroyed the info to impede the investigation(honestly this last part is fairly easy as long as the first part can happen) then yea what he did would defo break the law, but until those aspects can be determined this seems like a massive abuse of that persons 1st(due to activism), 4th (due to the seizure of private property without a lawful search), and 5th(again private property) amendment rights.

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 week ago (7 children)

I'm having a tough time thinking of an example where this makes sense. I guess if there was one incriminating document they had evidence was on your phone and then you wiped it you'd be interfering with the investigation under the assumption there could be more? If they knew a out the one then they would have a copy of it and some proof you have it on your phone. You wiping it doesn't help you much for that particular crime. If it's a crime to delete the stuff they didn't know you had, that sounds ripe for abuse. They could find something banal like a miscompleted tax form and use it to do a deep dive into someone's entire document library, browser hx, etc. Perhaps I'm on the wrong side of the law on this one, but it seems like the law should favor a right to avoid self-incrimination and a right to protection from unjust violations of privacy. Anyway, while it looks suspicious, couldn't it just be an accidental data wipe? Cops making accusations against someone could make them nervous, maybe make typing finger shaky and inaccurate. Maybe they could mis-enter their password 10 times in a row and trigger a wipe?

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] fodor@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I think your speculation is probably going to be fairly close to reality, but that makes their case very difficult to prove. If the FBI comes to my house and tells me that they're investigating a crime and then I delete data, then probably I have broken the law. And I would have known it. So I would get convicted. But Border Patrol loves to go on fishing expeditions and search digital devices when there is no evidence that a crime has been committed. And if that's the case, then I don't have any obligation to preserve the data. And it doesn't even matter what Border Patrol claims later because the legal standard is going to be what I believed at the time that they tried to go on their fishing expedition.

I think we can safely conclude that there was no warrant because no one has reported there was a warrant and that is the kind of thing that they would have reported. And if they had one they would have seized the phone itself. So we can reasonably conclude that this is a situation where they told the guy, unlock your phone or we're going to keep you locked up or we're going to take your phone.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] PushButton@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Does the Rights against self-incrimination and the Right to remain silent help here?

I don't see something they can really do against it? I am not in the USa so, someone?

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Not really, no. You have the right to not give testimony against yourself, including by not providing evidence that would hurt you, but that doesn't mean you can actively destroy evidence.

[–] PancakesCantKillMe@lemmy.world 35 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Evidence of what exactly? Was a crime previously committed? Was it the officer's "instincts" that told them so? This is the fun part of authoritarianism, there may have been zero evidence deleted (we don't know), but now the act of wiping it creates a crime they can charge someone with. Bake him away, toys!

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's CBP, probably at the airport, so I don't think you'd find a court saying they exceeded their authority in seizing the phone for search. They have very broad authority.

It's not ethical at all, of course, but it's been perfectly legal for decades, under multiple administrations.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They have broad latitude to initiate searches, but if there isn't a specific crime they're going after you for, you're not destroying evidence. If they're just fishing to see what you have in there, then there isn't evidence being destroyed because they have no way to know whether you erased stuff because you were doing crimes or just didn't want them to see your nudes.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] village604@adultswim.fan 16 points 1 week ago

The real question is when the wipe happened. If it happened after he was informed they were taking the phone as evidence, then that's bad for him.

But otherwise they'd have to convince a jury that he could see the future.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

I think things are also a bit dicey when CBP is doing it. As they are a fed agency and pretty much all they do is national security.

[–] tabular@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Ya'll have phones?

Maybe I should not, if it can be taken with no articulable reason given.

[–] surph_ninja@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

In Georgia, where this is happening, they also consider not having a phone to be probable cause for arrest.

https://georgiarecorder.com/2024/02/12/georgia-ag-claims-not-having-a-phone-makes-you-a-criminal/

[–] tabular@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

If Deputy Attorney General John Fowler said that tgen he is an asshole. I don't accept the premiss of assholes.

[–] surph_ninja@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Well, the court does. This is coming from Carr, who’s been trying to make headlines for his gubernatorial run.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

better of getting a burner phone .

[–] ChromaticMan@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] hildegarde@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Samuel Tunick, is described as a local Atlanta activist

not a visitor

[–] mPony@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

They are hunting their own citizens. It's madness.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 week ago

CAUT, Canadian Association of University Teachers has a travel warning about going to the US, including:

Do not wipe your phones. Do not carry a burner phone. Anyone who declares they are a Professor will be searched.

The overal advice, which I took, is avoid travel to the US. My NEXUS/GOES cards went to a shredder.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›