Why start your own marriage when you can become a minority stakeholder by investing in mine? Minimize risk and maximize reward, dummy. It's basic economics.
this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2023
46 points (97.9% liked)
chapotraphouse
13473 readers
1 users here now
Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.
No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer
Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank
Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here
Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
Well yeah, a couple would have a good start if they were handed a few million in VC money
And then a series A, followed by a series B...
Marriage IPO
“How to Avoid Arther C Brooks and Why He Will Never Be In a Committed Relationship”
The definitive brooks Ranking:
- Michael
- Mel
- Arthur
- David
in a capitalist hellscape without a safety net, i get considering a marriage through a lens as if it were a merger of assets and liabilities, but let's not pretend that is a romantic impulse. it is literally the practical and therefore not-romantic side of a marriage.
stg, every time i have seen economic abuse, it's because the abuser tries to make financial considerations out to be or need-to-be more romantic.
I wish those guys would take a good look in the mirror, like come on
That's fuckin hilarious. Life imitates art.
