this post was submitted on 10 Dec 2025
305 points (93.0% liked)

movies

2306 readers
272 users here now

A community about movies and cinema.

Related communities:

Rules

  1. Be civil
  2. No discrimination or prejudice of any kind
  3. Do not spam
  4. Stay on topic
  5. These rules will evolve as this community grows

No posts or comments will be removed without an explanation from mods.

founded 9 months ago
MODERATORS
 

Not sure if memes are allowed here. Apologies if they aren't.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dil@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

If you wanna watch movies that actually feel like art just watch sexploitation films (whats funny is they are less perverted than most modern pg 13 films) Apparently sexploitation means exploiting the audience by using sex to grab their attention, so like game of thrones, shameless, outlander, even modern family, etc. lol. I always thought it meant the actors got abused or some sht, but they're still alive and that doesn't seem to be the case for the most part.

A lot of them are surreal af and feel like time capsules. Plots super basic, barely any characters, but the scenery is sometimes amazing, like every place they film I want to visit. They are weirdly memorable for their scenes while I could not tell you a single movies name. I think the horniest one ive seen is no where near as horny as modern movies/television that aren't framed as sexploitive.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Our breakfast television has a movie critic straight out of the feuilleton. Any movie that people actually go to is automatically bad, and there is not enough praise for art house films that makes people fall asleep in the cinema and never even make it to TV or streaming.

[–] GeeDubHayduke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Sounds like the time Ebert of Siskel & Ebert gave Twister a thumbs down because "it had no plot."

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 week ago (3 children)

it's the former, not the latter

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] UKFilmNerd@feddit.uk 4 points 1 week ago

I've realised that over time, a lot of my favourite films or ones that I enjoy and basically mainstream blockbusters.

I try to broaden my horizons but quite often, I find these amazing acclaimed films boring.

It's not quite the same but I was amazed when I got the Criterion edition of Armageddon. All these bonus features about a great blockbuster film.

So imagine my disappointment when every other release from Criterion is a film I'll probably never watch in the first place.

Example, I took a chance on Brazil because I was in a bit of a Terry Gilliam phase. I quite enjoyed that one. Then I tried Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas. That DVD never got a second play.

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (8 children)

Looking at you, Mulholland Drive

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Hexarei@beehaw.org 4 points 1 week ago (13 children)

This is me with most Tarantino films. I watched Pulp Fiction and have no idea what actually happened in that movie.

[–] Nangijala@feddit.dk 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I find many of his movies enjoyable, but they definitely is a required taste. The last Tarantino movie I saw was the hateful 8 and I hated that movie so much, so I get where you're coming from. Haven't watched his movie about Hollywood because I cannot bring myself to care about Hollywood people making movies about life in Hollywood. The only Hollywood director who could get away with that was David Lynch, but he also had so much more to say and his Hollywood-focused films were so much deeper than the typical navel gazing bullshit in that specific niche genre. Under the Silver Lake is a movie I wish I could unsee. Ironically another film that people seem to love, but where I'm just over here like: okay Hollywood, don't gas yourself to death with all that farthuffing.

[–] IronBird@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

Time in Hollywood is good, but then if you did like hateful 8 maybe his movies just arent for you

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[–] binarytobis@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Recently I went on IMDB and created a list of highly fan rated movies from the past 2 years. So far they have been hard to watch.

[–] SlurpingPus@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

IMDb has a ‘top 250’, not sure why you needed to create anything yourself.

[–] Eyck_of_denesle@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

This was me with "One Battle after another", it was not incomprehensible rather the opposite, it was very simple. Don't get me wrong I don't think the movie is bad or anything but for such hype created I was expecting it to be a bit more revolutionary. It also doesn't help that you need to watch DeCaprio shouting Viva la revolución

I really like Bugonia, Code 3 and Roofman from the recent movies I watched. Bugonia is a little confusing but it's still easy to get it's message. The other two are quite simple but the opposite of boring.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

How was Bugonia confusing in any way?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›