this post was submitted on 10 Dec 2025
82 points (98.8% liked)

News

35774 readers
1881 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Democrats’ resounding victories in the New Jersey and Virginia governor’s races got most of the headlines, but the most dramatic results in last month’s elections were downballot. In Virginia, Democratic challengers flipped 13 seats in the Virginia House of Delegates, to secure their largest majority in the chamber in four decades. New Jersey Democrats grew their margin in the assembly by five seats—winning their largest majority since Watergate. Coupled with the party’s string of upset victories and double-digit shifts in special elections last year, the results have some party leaders dreaming big.

How big? A new post-election analysis from the Democratic Legislative Campaign Committee, which supports Democratic candidates in statehouse races, argues that the current electoral climate presents the best chance in years for Democrats to consolidate power in blue states, flip battleground chambers, and loosen Republicans’ grip on power in solidly red states like South Carolina and Missouri.

By the group’s calculations, Democratic candidates over-performed the partisan leaning of their districts this fall by an average of 4.5 points—a shift that would put as many as 651 state legislative seats in play across the country in a midterm election year, and position the party for a bit of long-awaited payback.

all 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PixelatedSaturn@lemmy.world 26 points 2 months ago

In sure they will snatch defeat from the jaws of victory in the end.

[–] Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 26 points 2 months ago (2 children)

This country has a major reactionary problem. Too often we see blue and red waves as a reaction of either conservatives shitting on Democrat presidents on TV/social media or reality punching common people in the gut under Republican administrations. There has to be a way to keep voter's disgust of Republicans in place year over year.

[–] ethnss@ttrpg.network 15 points 2 months ago

There has to be a way to keep voter’s disgust of Republicans in place year over year.

There was, but democrats voted against him twice.

[–] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 months ago

It's like the DNC is playing a version of Pascal's Wager for political parties: if the country still exists in the future, its only interest is to be positioned to capture the most power it can. If it doesn't exist, oh well, that's a problem for physical people to worry about.

[–] Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org 16 points 2 months ago (2 children)

As long as they actually follow the will of the people, not the will of the corporate donors, they can win. That's the one thing they need to change.

[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org 4 points 2 months ago

As we've been for around the last 10 years.

[–] BarbecueCowboy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

We don't do that here.

We mostly just try to choose the ones with corporate donors that are the least bad. To be a bit more serious, with things like the Citizen United decision, I honestly don't see how anything else would be feasible any time soon.

[–] Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org 1 points 2 months ago

Yeah. If we ever get a Supreme Court worth anything, we need to get that overturned in a hurry.