This is great, But using Microsoft Windows should be illegal for public services in EU.
We can no longer allow ourselves to depend on American IT infrastructure.
this post was submitted on 10 Dec 2025
833 points (99.5% liked)
Technology
77631 readers
1992 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Public Money should result in public code.
It can't be, that our public money lands as profits in non European companies.
That should be a given, imho
I 100% agree, but some would consider that a matter of ideology.
The other point about dependency on USA when they are acting with hostility is more pragmatic.
99% of people don't understand all the reason why open source is better for public services, except if we can say it's cheaper. That's the one point they understand, and the one point Microsoft has been attacking most with their propaganda against open source.
Go away with your common sense!
Another government stops renting key software and instead invests in actuall ownership!
Honestly, if Microsoft said they wanted to own the Autobahn I could only imagine people would tell them to fuck off (in english and deutche). Why would digital infrastructure be any different?
Shouldn’t be. Glad the world is waking up to these vile tech companies. US government needs to stop coddling them too.
Be nice if Chicago had the same attitude towards our highways ):
Honestly. I think private companies can have a place in public infra, but it's not in the freaking ownership. Rent seeking is the worst and most destructive aspect of private ownership and we've known and can look at countless example of that since Adam Smith!
Private companies should be allowed to build their own infrastructure or rent public infrastructure. But they shouldn't be allowed to purchase public infrastructure. Imo
5 million a year would go a long way towards making their open source solutions meet their needs.
The cynic in me says they are very good at burning through such amounts without any notable progress. However since it is open source, my hopes are up that this will lift the veil where otherwise bureaucracy and corruption will waste the money.
I mean, optionally they could set up a tiny dev shop with that amount and submit the PRs they want to submit. And at worst, they could maintain their own fork.
It'd be a public service in more ways than one.
load more comments
(1 replies)
This is so selfish. What about the shareholders?!!!??
And since thes last update from the USA on how they view the EU, this will not be the last move EU countries will make.
I know, I work for one of them. We are ACTIVELY planning our usexit.
Trump admin shoots the U.S. in the foot every chance it gets
Trust comes on foot and leaves by horse.
It will be decades before some semblance of trust has been earned back by the USA (starting after they act normally again, whenever that may be)
True. It’s not just Trump that feels this way either. Lots of American oligarchs and groups like Claremont and Heritage that support this shit.
It's cause they misunderstood the prefix for foot and got all excited.
In Soviet USsia, USsia exits EU!
This is also good news because it obviously means that german government will have to review the software used for possible security holes and close them, so everyone who also uses the software gets security fixes.
Hehe hehe hehe. Yeah no, you overestimate German state governments
I really hope GNU/Linux can run on old Fax machines and the printing-out-emails workflow works smoothly.
Seriously. While I support the change to foss solutions, this is going to go over like a fart in church for the people that were just forced off fax machines and into email a year ago. And there’s a zero percent chance that Germany will use any of those savings for a support infrastructure. The German way is to figure it out, and endure the suffering while you do with the bare minimum of support from people that barely know the shit themselves.
I have a friend who is principal at a high school here in DE and the stories she’s been telling me about the new push to get tablets into the hands of kids is straight fkn Monty Python level absurdity… from the staff!
Germany painted themselves into a corner with their refusal to modernize their tech infrastructure. The “it’s not broken, so don’t fix it” mentality has left them 20 years behind all their neighbors. But, hey, traditions over everything… amirite?
You might want to read this article. Yes, it's in german. Yes, it's behind a paywall. But your analysis is totally wrong here
load more comments
(7 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
In before Microsoft break out the FUD tactics and a year or two of cheap licenses.
load more comments
(4 replies)
They do this every few years, when the contract is up for negotiation, M$ will make a way cheaper option, and they will switch back
I'm holding out hope that discounts wont work this time, because the motivation is different. It used to be about cost, now it's about digital sovereignty. I won't bet anything of value, but I can hope.
Inspiration for many more governments!
I have already contacted my, Slovakian government. I should ping them again 😅
didn't another german state already try this and fail pretty spectacularly?? cost them WAY more money and then they ended up rolling back to m$??
given that, this is fantastic news! it's good to see people learn from past failed implementations, hopefully learn from their mistakes, and try again instead of just blaming it on bad software
You're not thinking about when Microsoft bribed their way into them not switching by opening an office in the area?
This. It was the city of Munich. They had their own linux distro "Munix" and everything. Then the conservative party won the election. You know the rest.
Then the conservative party won the election.
that's the second or third statement in most modern cautionary tales nowadays
load more comments
(3 replies)
Yeah, it was a political decision, not one based on how well the Linux transition worked.
They used Linux for quite some time productively. It wasn't a failed transition at all.
I’ve been trying to find a source but from what I remember the transition was in maybe Munich and it was going fine.
Microsoft opened a new sales or operation center there and got cozy with the government there as quickly as possible to turn them back into a customer.
EDIT: Here is the LiMux endeavor.
Microsoft had announced in 2013 its willingness to move its German headquarters to Munich in 2016, which according to Reiter though, is unrelated to the criticism they've presented against the LiMux project.
load more comments
(1 replies)
view more: next ›