this post was submitted on 09 Dec 2025
206 points (99.0% liked)

Opensource

4591 readers
34 users here now

A community for discussion about open source software! Ask questions, share knowledge, share news, or post interesting stuff related to it!

CreditsIcon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient



founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 47 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Beuh, fuck the HDMI forum. I hope the spec is leaked and somebody just makes a kernel module which implements it.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I realize this is probably a solved problem for Windows pirates, but how do you trust the kernel if it's not from a legal reputable source?

[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What makes a legal source reputable? Do you think Microsoft is "reputable"?

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Being reviewed and used by many people. So if it's just some guy releasing kernels by himself, then I'd be worried that it might include malware.

I know Windows is garbage, but I assume the people pirating it don't see it that way, and do care about additional malware. So I'm curious how they approach this problem. Do they just not care about malware in their OS because it's already that bad?

[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

HDMI support can be released as a kernel module. It need not be an entire kernel. That can be put on a repository and reviewed, included in distribution, then built on installation using DKMS. That's how most opensource works.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Ah OK. When you said the spec would be leaked, I mistakenly assumed lawyer problems.

[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 4 points 1 week ago

Oh, for sure lawyers would be pissed, but DRM was cracked multiple times and ended up in distributions. H264 is patented and still linux distributions can use it. CDs and DVDs were ripped with opensource software after their encryption was cracked (master key retrieved from CD/DVD players) and that was also distributed in order to play them. Popcorn Time was hosted on github for a good while. There are many examples.

If HDMI2 were leaked, I'm confident it would end up in a linux distro and there isn't much the lawyers could do. They could play whack a mole to take down the domains hosting it, but then somebody would just out it on a torrent or host it in a country that give a fuck about the lawyers and that would be that.

[–] nukeforyou@lemmy.zip 43 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Why even bother with HDMI??

ooh I love to pay royalties to and get permission to use the technology and the trademark. /s

[–] Davel23@fedia.io 46 points 1 week ago

Because love it or hate it, HDMI is the main interface that the vast majority of TVs use.

[–] jonne 30 points 1 week ago

For this specific device you want to be able to hook it up to a TV, and unfortunately TVs tend to come with HDMI, not the superior displayport.

[–] Psythik@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

Find me a TV that's both designed for gaming and has a DisplayPort. Hell, find me any consumer TV with the port. Remember that the Steam Machine is intended for the living room big screen, not a 27" gaming monitor.

[–] refalo@programming.dev 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)
[–] Psythik@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Um, I said TV, and all three of these are monitors. Niche monitors at that too, none of them are even in stock.

Furthermore, how many console gamers do you know who have a 55" Alienware monitor in their living room? I did say consumer TV as well, ya know.

[–] refalo@programming.dev 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

What is your definition of TV in this context? All of these are 55"+, some even show pictures of it in a living room...

[–] Psythik@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Look: It doesn't matter what you think is and isn't a TV, the fact of the matter is that the target market doesn't have one of these and doesn't care. They've got their $300 65" Hisense from Walmart, and guess what? Those TVs don't have DisplayPort. That's the point.

Now please stop being a pedantic jerk just for the sake of a it and go away.

[–] Lumisal@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Aren't you literally being pedantic on the definition? They're both displays in the 55 inch range that can display media and are made for consumers.

You're the one who keeps moving the goalposts.

[–] The_Decryptor@aussie.zone 0 points 1 week ago (2 children)

https://www.amazon.com.au/dp/B015OW3GJK

There's always this option, could even include something like it in the box.

[–] x00z@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

That's a passive cable and would require DP++. Funnily enough it would also require a HDMI 2.1 capable driver.

[–] entwine@programming.dev 1 points 1 week ago

That probably won't work. It will get basic video and maybe audio through, but not features like VRR, which is why you'd care about HDMI 2.1 support at all

[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It will be replaced by GDMI which the Chinese invented in the future anyway.

[–] 0x0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Did they also invent time travel?

[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 4 points 1 week ago

That's coming in V2

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

They will invented it

[–] saphiron@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago
[–] Scrollone@feddit.it 10 points 1 week ago

We need to stop using HDMI, we must force screen makers to switch to DisplayPort.

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)

What kind of cancer is this website? Some fukcing "pur" subscription required.

[–] Successful_Try543@feddit.org 8 points 1 week ago

It's "pay or OK", the "pur" subscription isn't needed for viewing the content. They'll probably gonna stick to that until the highest court has finally ruled that "pay or OK" is not OK at all.

[–] entwine@programming.dev 5 points 1 week ago

Ublock has a feature to disable javascript by default. There's no better way to use the internet in 2025