News

Not only did they search the bag without a warrant...

Wasser resumed her search after an 11-minute drive to the police station and almost immediately found the gun and silencer — the latter discovery prompting her to laugh and exclaim “nice,” according to body-worn camera footage. Wasser said the gun was in a side pocket that she hadn’t searched at McDonald’s.

She had the bag in her car for over ten minutes, with not witnesses or video, and then after resuming the incomplete search almost immediately found the gun and silencer. My read is that there is every possibility that the gun and silencer could have been placed in the bag during that transport.

An officer concerned about a bomb accidentally being brought to the police station (again) would hardly forget to look in the bag's side pockets. Nor is it reasonable to suggest that they could overlook a gun and silencer in the initial search of the bag.

Is it not legal to carry bullets any more?

On body-worn camera video played in court, Wasser was heard saying she wanted to check the bag for bombs before removing it from the McDonald’s. Despite that concern, she acknowledged in her testimony Monday that police never cleared the restaurant of customers or employees.

Unless they had probable cause to believe there was a bomb, that's absolutely no excuse for a search. Might as well just get rid of the fourth amendment altogether if police can just imagine the possibility of a dangerous object and excuse searching anything at any time.

If she really thought there was a bomb, she is recklessly handling this herself instead of calling in a properly trained and equipped bomb squad. But far worse, she claims she needed to check it so as not bring a bomb to the station, but apparently has no problem potentially handling a bomb around a bunch of innocent bystanders.

That she is lying in order to justify what she knew to be an illegal search is actually the least damning interpretation. Either way though, the evidence should be thrown out along with her career.

We can't trust any 'evidence' cops find because they have an extensive history of planting it.

Well that clinches it. Bullets are super rare in the US. 

Wouldn’t the bullets that killed the CEO be in the corpse and not Luigi’s bag? Sounds like exculpatory evidence to me…

Just a reminder, a judge decided this guy should go free: https://newsfeed.time.com/2013/12/12/the-affluenza-defense-judge-rules-rich-kids-rich-kid-ness-makes-him-not-liable-for-deadly-drunk-driving-accident/

Luigi wasn’t there he was with me, we were picking blueberries in the woods.

Ridiculous. There’s like ten thousand people who can testify that he was with them at the time of the shooting.

I find it hard to believe he was just casually carrying around bullets days after allegedly shooting someone.....

Could this dude be any more photogenic? Goddamn

No way to know if those bullets and other objects on the bag were there or were planted by the cops.

Was it just a random collection of unfired rounds in different calibers?

Wasn’t the official story such that a search at the scene of arrest found nothing, but suddenly the gun was found on search once the bag was in police custody in a second location? It’s hard to keep track of the truth in 2025.

Nah I don't believe it. Look at that face. He should be pat on the head and sent home with well-wishes.

Those were my bullets. They were on loan before we went to the range together.

The only useful outcome is acquittal. These rich board room types need to know they're not safe.

He was up here in Ottawa hoisting a beer with me at my local pub.

"A loaded gun magazine" aka just a magazine, you don't describe a magazine as loaded. They just wanted to use the word loaded to make it seem more dangerous so the jury sees him as violent

In the part of rural Pennsylvania where people have guns. Yeah, Ok.