this post was submitted on 05 Dec 2025
514 points (98.1% liked)

Buy European

7729 readers
492 users here now

Overview:

The community to discuss buying European goods and services.


Matrix Chat of this community


Rules:

  • Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. No direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments.

  • Do not use this community to promote Nationalism/Euronationalism. This community is for discussing European products/services and news related to that. For other topics the following might be of interest:

  • Include a disclaimer at the bottom of the post if you're affiliated with the recommendation.

  • No russian suggestions.

Feddit.uk's instance rules apply:

  • No racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia or xenophobia.
  • No incitement of violence or promotion of violent ideologies.
  • No harassment, dogpiling or doxxing of other users.
  • Do not share intentionally false or misleading information.
  • Do not spam or abuse network features.
  • Alt accounts are permitted, but all accounts must list each other in their bios.
  • No generative AI content.

Useful Websites

Benefits of Buying Local:

local investment, job creation, innovation, increased competition, more redundancy.

European Instances

Lemmy:

Friendica:

Matrix:


Related Communities:

Buy Local:

Continents:

European:

Buying and Selling:

Boycott:

Countries:

Companies:

Stop Publisher Kill Switch in Games Practice:


Banner credits: BYTEAlliance


founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] Fokeu@lemmy.zip 2 points 5 days ago

They're compensating their small dicks with big cars

[โ€“] tiredofsametab@fedia.io 41 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Also out of Japan as well, please. We definitely don't need these, especially in pedestrian- and cyclist-heavy areas. (I have seen hummers trying to drive some streets in Tokyo and it's insane).

[โ€“] Havatra@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

A Hummer in Tokyo?! Honestly that's impressive, considering the width of most non-main roads there. But still, why would one need such a car in such a place? Tokyo works even better without a car at all, imho.

load more comments (1 replies)
[โ€“] Scrollone@feddit.it 39 points 1 week ago (3 children)

We need to limit the size of cars that can enter our cities. Seriously.

It can also be done in an indirect way, e.g. by making smaller parking spaces and give fines to cars that exceed the shapes.

[โ€“] lepinkainen@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Allow them, donโ€™t ban.

BUT make owning one so expensive and annoying nobody wants to get one.

Extra taxes, extra costs, donโ€™t let big gas guzzlers in city centres etc.

Americans are paying 100k for these fucking things now. Taking out 10 year long loans to pay for it. And then crying about gas prices on twitter. Not sure cost will stop people. People are idiots.

[โ€“] gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Nah, just ban them.

Extra Tax and Fees just makes it a poor people tax, and rich assholes will carry on as if nothing changes. A straight-up ban makes them not appear at all.

[โ€“] OshaqHennessey@midwest.social 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

This is the better option. But, if you're gonna do that, there needs to be some kind of program that allows people to sell their banned vehicle to the government for above market value so they can afford to purchase a comparable, but more suitable vehicle instead. Otherwise, you're gonna have a bunch of pissed off people with six-figure, three-ton lawn ornaments crying about how they couldn't have known their vehicle would get banned and it's now useless.

[โ€“] gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 week ago

Already a system done all across the world in everywhere but America, it's called a Trade-in program.

load more comments (1 replies)
[โ€“] Rcklsabndn@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Agreed, wasn't it a 'work truck' heavy vehicle tax break after the fuel crisis in the 70s that created these monstrosities?

(Please correct me if I'm wrong, I'm late for work.)

[โ€“] lepinkainen@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

AFAIK yes, thatโ€™s the loophole. If a vehicle is heavy enough then the law assumes it must be for โ€œworkโ€ and thus some pollution laws donโ€™t apply.

Car manufacturers noticed this and thus the massive โ€œSportsโ€ โ€œUtilityโ€ Vehicle was born.

[โ€“] birdwing@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

The solution then is to remove that loophole, by keeping the pollution laws applied there. And those who actually used such vehicles for work? Yeah, sucks, but they should complain at those car manufacturers.

Or alternatively, we classify them as trucks instead of as cars.

Close. I believe you're referring to the EPA efficiency mandates passed in the 90s that carved out exceptions for "heavy duty" trucks and SUVs, which lead to the creation of "crossover" vehicles, which started as a way to deliver car-like efficiency and features, while still minimizing development and efficiency costs by still having it classified as a "truck."

[โ€“] gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 week ago

No, you're entirely correct (though it was one of many factors, that being the largest)

load more comments (1 replies)
[โ€“] OshaqHennessey@midwest.social 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

So, pass a ban that only applies to poor people and let the rich continue to do whatever they want still since they can afford the fine?

[โ€“] birdwing@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

You can have an income- and wealth-dependent fine.

It could be as a % of your total income (bonus included) + wealth (including stocks, full ownership chain included).

1.5% of income, 5% of wealth in bank account, 10% of stock value. If any of these three exceeds 300x the median of the lowest 10%'s salary (let's say that that's 10k), then it's 80% for all three. That would hit the ultra-wealthy more and so it'd be fairer.


For a poor person earning less than โ‚ฌ10,000 a year and having โ‚ฌ1,000 in bank and no stocks, that'd be โ‚ฌ200.

For someone earning โ‚ฌ40,000 a year, having โ‚ฌ80,000 in bank and โ‚ฌ10,000 in stocks, that'd be โ‚ฌ5,600.

For a billionnaire who has 1 billion, let's say โ‚ฌ2,000,000 per year as "income", โ‚ฌ100,000,000 in "bank account", and the rest of 1 billion in stocks. Then they'd be paying โ‚ฌ 801.6 million.

load more comments (1 replies)
[โ€“] merc@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Some places are taxing / fining vehicles over a certain weight. That seems like a good solution. The fine should be proportional to the offender's wealth/income though or rich people will just be able to ignore it.

Certain weight and size, would be good, imho.

Have a bit looser restrictions for road freight lorries and vans, but only regarding the back if they're fully covered (instead of open), and owned by actual transport companies, with logs of what they transported, and actually used for that purpose at least 40 x a year.

load more comments (2 replies)

As and American and specifically a New Yorker I absolutely despise cars and I mean all cars. Genuenly I think if any city in America, New York should be the one that bans all cars and replaces the roads with biking/pedestrian roads. The grand majority of people here dont even own a car let alone acturally use one, most drivers here are coming in from New Jersey (probrally because the New Jersey public transportation system sucks.)

Hell I say we should bring back trams (modern European Trams) to replace the busses and expand the metro system. We dont need cars we need more options for public transportation and a greater biking infrastructure. We are so close yet so far from completely changing the image from a loud city with garbage drivers to a beautiful city with no cars.

I know many Europeans are feeling the same so for those living in cities I encurage you to demand the same from your city governments. CARS DONT BELONG IN CITIES

[โ€“] Underwaterbob@sh.itjust.works 31 points 1 week ago (4 children)

You see a few of them here-and-there in Korea these days. They're extra infuriating here because they don't fit in most parking spaces and they'll straight-up turn a lot of two-way roads into one-way. I don't think I've ever seen one with something in the bed. Purely for show.

[โ€“] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 week ago

that one way becomes a no-eay real quick when they meet somebody who calls their bluff

[โ€“] El_Scapacabra@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 week ago

The only thing I've seen people haul with these (in Europe) is their own overinflated ego. That's all they're for it seems.

[โ€“] frunch@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I don't think I've ever seen one with something in the bed.

That's usually the case here in the States as well. Not to mention how high the bed sits! You have to lift stuff to shoulder height to load the damn things, lol. They've become caricatures of trucks at this point.

load more comments (1 replies)
[โ€“] Tigeroovy@lemmy.ca 24 points 1 week ago

Wish we didnโ€™t have these big stupid things in Canada. Every dumb asshole you could ever meet has one and they all drive and park like the dumb assholes that they are.

[โ€“] Buckshot@programming.dev 20 points 1 week ago

Came back to my car the other day to find one of the trucks parked to me. Could barely squeeze into my car then it was 2m longer than my car and so much higher i literally couldn't see a thing to drive out.

Had to creep forward but i had zero visibility until my driver window was past the front of the truck. It then stuck out the space so much i needed a 3 point turn to get around it due to cars parked opposite.

I was at end of the row so had to turn across it to get out. Just totally unsafe for anyone not inside it!

[โ€“] klangcola@reddthat.com 11 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Are these trucks classified as cars or trucks in most EU country?

In Norway (EEA but not EU) they are trucks (due to weight and carry capacity), and require a C1 truck driving licence. Which helps keep the numbers low. Though there have been cases of importers downgrading the suspension to lower the maximum carry capacity to reclassify them so they can be driven on a normal car class B driving license.

[โ€“] merc@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

In the USA (and I think Canada, and maybe Mexico) pickup trucks, SUVs and minivans are classified as "light trucks". That's a different category from cars. That exempts them from a lot of regulations that would seem like they should apply to every vehicle. For example, you'd think that every vehicle on the road would have to have their bumpers at the same height, otherwise when two vehicles collide their bumpers might miss. While it's true that cars have to have their bumpers at a certain height, "light trucks" don't have to follow that same regulation, and often have higher bumpers, meaning they go over the bumpers of cars and directly impact the bodywork. They also get away from having to follow emissions standards, etc.

I don't know what EU regulations are like, but I really hope they prevent the US manufacturers from exporting that loophole to Europe. They'll probably get away with classifying them as a kind of vehicle that requires the same license as a normal car. However, hopefully the EU will require that they follow other car-like regulations too, like bumper height, safety systems, etc.

[โ€“] klangcola@reddthat.com 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The bit that's so perplexing is that in north America they are not "cars" but "light trucks" , yet they can be legally driven on a normal "car" driving licence.

Here "light trucks" are a separate, expensive, license, which is usually only taken for occupational reasons. Which is a good thing, since weight (and securing loads etc) has a massive impact on road safety.

load more comments (1 replies)
[โ€“] Damage@feddit.it 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Under 3.5 tons they're cars

[โ€“] klangcola@reddthat.com 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

3.5 tonns maximum total capacity right? Or net weight?

So a 3 tonne truck that can haul 1 tonne of goods for a total of 4 tonnes gross weight would be a need a truck license

[โ€“] Damage@feddit.it 2 points 1 week ago
[โ€“] TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Hey, I know they are dumb, ugly, dangerous and annoying, but some people in Europe have micro penisses too! Oh wait, we have Porsche for that. Never mind, fuck off with those testosterone tankers.

At least Porsches look beautiful and aren't as tall. I'd say it's a better spending of money than those compensation cars.

[โ€“] drmoose@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

How can people stand to drive these. You are so limited with how you can navigate the environment with barely any benefit.

[โ€“] Rcklsabndn@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The excuse I've heard is that they want visibility because everyone else has tall ass jacked up trucks they need to be jacked up too.

With that mentality, we should fit all of our toddlers and preteens with stilts and hivis vests so these poor truck owners will see them over the massive hood.

[โ€“] drmoose@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

True example of "race to the bottom"

load more comments (1 replies)
[โ€“] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Not so fun fact: For every 10cm in car hight theres a corresponding increase in fatalities by 22% (source)

These machines maim us, they kill us, and they cause permanent bodily harm to us. However in exchange they make us fatter, more depressed, less connected, more lonely, angrier, allow us to waste time in traffic, and enjoy cities with less green spaces.

But on the bright side when you spend a significant portion of your paycheck on these horrid machines, and some child in Africa dies for the raw resources needed to make them you can sleep easy at night knowing an automobile CEO can afford his sixth mansion and his eighth mega yacht.

[โ€“] percent 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If nobody buys them, then they'll exit the market. American companies value profit.

[โ€“] Pofski@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

I think there is a certain percentage of the population that is a problem everywhere.

[โ€“] arsCynic@piefed.social 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I wish I could ride my bike like a Scythed Chariot and destroy all these death machines that have the gall to ride on the bike path.

I mean fuck! I hate cars and pretentious drivers so goddamn much. The only thing they have to do to accelerate is push a pedal once with less effort than moving a feather of a newborn chick, yet they for some reason consistently claim the right of way, or get it by law even. Topsy-turvy society.

โ€œI reduced the insolent crowd of carriages which cumber our streets, for this luxury of speed destroys its own aim; a pedestrian makes more headway than a hundred conveyances jammed end to end along the twists and turns of the Sacred Way.โ€ โ€•Memoirs of Hadrian by Marguerite Yourcenar (1903โ€“1987)


Scythed Chariot - Wikipedia illustration

load more comments
view more: next โ€บ