this post was submitted on 05 Dec 2025
131 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

77816 readers
2327 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 31 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

/r/nottheonion

Excuse me, a toilet camera‽

[–] asudox@lemmy.asudox.dev 1 points 1 week ago

!nottheonion@lemmy.world

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 28 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

What a waste of money.

I just upload videos of me shitting directly to German porn sites, and then read the comments to see if I have anything to worry about.

[–] itea@lemmy.zip 6 points 2 weeks ago
[–] pigup@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

I can't read German tho

[–] medem@lemmy.wtf 24 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Toilet cameras. Every time I think to myself that humanity's intellectual capacity has hit a new low, reality proves me wrong.

[–] madcaesar@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

🤣 Equally as dumb was a while back some wifi bed that refused to expand or collapse or something without internet, so people couldn't sleep on it while the sever was down

[–] medem@lemmy.wtf 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Sounds familiar: didn't the AWS outage last month also nuke 3,000+ USD 'smart beds'?

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I remember when cameras in toilets were a thing that women lived in fear of, especially in public toilets.

Now its a thing we're buying from corporations to give them HD live stream of the same thing.

[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 24 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (5 children)

I mean, it is encrypted between their end and your... uh... end. Just not encrypted at their end.

I wonder who has to review the logs. That would be a shit job.

[–] BertramDitore@lemmy.zip 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Heh logs.

You fixed my crappy morning, much appreciated.

[–] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 weeks ago
[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

They train their AI with it. 22998110

[–] dan@upvote.au 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

It is encrypted at their end - they say the data is encrypted both in transit and at rest.

However, it's not end-to-end encrypted, in the usual meaning of the term. E2EE usually means that only the sender and intended recipients of the data can decrypt the it, not the company running the service, their affiliates, or any intermediaries.

[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 2 points 2 weeks ago

End-to-End? More like ass-to-ass

[–] toiletobserver@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

So, many, puns...

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 24 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

What kind of lunatic is gonna buy an online enabled toilet camera to monitor their shits?

[–] Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago

Just wait for Law enforcement to get access to it. You know its coming.

"This shit has nuts in it. says the prosecution. Proving that they did not have a nut allergy. The prosecution rests."

[–] toynbee@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

What kind of lunatic is going to covertly monitor someone else's shits?

[–] HertzDentalBar@lemmy.blahaj.zone -1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Well if I was getting paid I'd probably do it for passive income.

[–] nickiwest@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

The article indicates that there's a monthly fee for the "service." So it's not a passive income situation.

[–] Mediocre_Bard@lemmy.world 18 points 2 weeks ago

... wait ... what?

I'm more concerned by the presence of the camera and less concerned about whether or not my taint pictures can be acquired by third parties. I don't want a second party involved.

[–] antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

And the privacy policy states data may be used “To create aggregated, de-identified and/or anonymized data, which we may use and share with third parties for our lawful business purposes, including to analyze and improve the Kohler Health Platform and our other products and services, to promote our business, and to train our AI and machine learning models.”

They're literally using people's shitting and pissing to train AI.

But isn't AI already shitty enough by itself??

There might be a world, after we've pulled the last billionaire's lungs out, when humans are back in control, that we can do research into defecating video that can identify bowel cancer just by letting a computer watch someone take a dump.

We do not yet live in this world though.

[–] northernlights@lemmy.today 16 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

ah, "end-to-end encrypted" meaning the transport is encrypted, but data in storage is not. Or it is with a hardcoded key everybody who ever worked in IT there knows. Classic.

Kudos to whoever approved a freaking camera on a toilet. I would like to know the name of their drug dealer.

[–] INHALE_VEGETABLES@aussie.zone 5 points 2 weeks ago

More like end to end enshition, amirite?!

https://youtu.be/m-wILIEKWps

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago

Walking into a meeting at Kohler and keeping a straight face after saying the words "toilet camera"--and then maintaining that straight face throughout the product's discussion, greenlighting, development, manufacture, and sale--deserves an Oscar.

[–] Fit_Series_573@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Toliet camera....for $600 camerw with a monthly subscription..... might as well just go to a doctor weekly with stool samples if you care this much about your rectal health. I can't see this being popular outside of a very niche group of patients that need it

[–] athairmor@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

I don’t think anybody needs this. Hypochondriacs are the only market I can see.

[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago

I’ve said this before…

toilet. camera.

ummm… no thanks

[–] Hawke@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I remember when toilet cameras were illegal and only on porn sites.

Guess everything changes when there’s money to be made.

[–] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 weeks ago

Oh there was money to be made there too. Just by the wrong people.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

You know the only thing more ridiculous than buying a toilet with a built in camera?

In October Kohler launched Dekota, a $600 (plus monthly subscription) device that attaches to the rim of your toilet and collects images and data from inside

Buying a camera to attach to an existing toilet, that has a monthly device fee that costs more than a fucking toilet does.

[–] stephey@programming.dev 5 points 2 weeks ago

By "End-to-End" encrypted, they were meaning the food.

~sigh~

[–] rowinxavier@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Just so I am clear, nobody has made the pun "end-to-end-to-end encryption" yet? Really?

[–] Natanael 1 points 2 weeks ago

In Swedish, ända till ända

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] Hominine@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

..no, I don't think I will.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago

"End-to-end encrypted using the time-tested ROT-13 cypher."

Or something even more porous.

[–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Which means that it's not end-to-end encrypted. It's HTTPS encrypted, which is different.

If it was truly end-to-end encrypted, the only person who could access it would be you, and all they would get would be garbled mess.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] toast@retrolemmy.com 2 points 2 weeks ago

I don't understand. The internet is just a series of tubes. Why don't they just transport the shit directly?