this post was submitted on 05 Dec 2025
170 points (97.2% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

36124 readers
3019 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] watson@lemmy.world 36 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

This is called a “dark pattern“ (a rather shitty design concept) wherein the design is specifically engineered to make you finally give up because it’s so overly complicated, and to just accept the cookies so they can track you and get all your personal information and sell it.

[–] hikaru755@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

It's also straight up illegal under gdpr. Rejecting all unnecessary cookies must be as easy as accepting them.

[–] cley_faye@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

It's also illegal. The "no fuck you" button should be as visible and accessible as the "accept all".

Make it as easy for users to withdraw their consent as it was for them to give their consent in the first place.

Obviously, no one cares. There's no real consequences, cookies are still dropped on your system regardless of consent, and cookies weren't even the real problem to begin with, user profiling had already moved to include other invasive techniques.

As far as making something complex and useless go, it'd have been way easier to work with the w3c to add attributes to cookies to identify their purpose (essential, preferences, etc.) so the browser could filter them out based on that attributes and the matching of the current website. It would have meant way less work on the website owners, provide ways for end-user to set their preferences universally and be done with it, enforced said preferences, and so on. And people that would lie on the purpose of their cookie would still lie, but could be caught red-handed (assuming anyone actually cared).

Instead we got this mess.

[–] Damn990099@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

I block their cookies anyways because i doubt they even listen to us when we opt out to begin with.

[–] Album@lemmy.ca 23 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Have your browser delete all cookies after you close it. It's easier. You can add exceptions too.

[–] Axolotl_cpp@feddit.it 13 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

When uou accept cookies you authorize them to collect data, just use the extension "I still don't care about cookies"

[–] Johanno@feddit.org 5 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Where I assume they collect it anyway because I didn't disagree

[–] parpol@programming.dev 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Pretty sure they collect it regardless of you disagreeing or not. Block all cookies by default always unless you are on a site where you need to log in.

[–] somerandomperson@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

But how do you "block cookies"?

[–] pankuleczkapl@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Cookies are just files stored on your computer. You just need to forbid the site from saving anything - done (all major browsers support this in some form).

Like, where do i do this?
I can't find it in settings.

[–] konna@sopuli.xyz 3 points 2 weeks ago

If I recall, the extension tries to disagree, then just hide the popup and finally it will resort to agreeing. Works remarkably well. Sometimes there is a broken scrollbar or site but its an easy fix: Disable, disagree manually, enable.

[–] Damarus@feddit.org 17 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Little known fact, it's illegal to hide the option to reject cookies behind multiple clicks.

[–] ShadowRam@fedia.io 8 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

it's illegal

Where? and who enforces it?

[–] pmk@piefed.ca 10 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

In the EU. It must be as easy to select no as it is to select yes. Afaik, each country has its own agency that you can contact about violations.

[–] Johanno@feddit.org 5 points 2 weeks ago

Europe. The European countries. Some more some less

[–] Demdaru@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

Just wanted to say that. And it's visible, when visiting from EU, if you click "Manage preferences", all except the "legitimate interest" ones are off by default.

WHICH IS BULLSHIT AS THERE IS NO LEGITIMATE INTEREST >_<

[–] lugal@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I know that but it doesn't really change anything. I'm not going to sue each and every website because of that

[–] Damarus@feddit.org 2 points 2 weeks ago

You don't have to sue anyone. You can ask the offenders to correct their website and if they don't, give a notice to the data protection authority in your country and they will handle it from there.

[–] winkerjadams@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Enable the annoyances/cookies list in uBlock origin and forget about them

[–] bobo1900@startrek.website 2 points 2 weeks ago

But also remember to clear cookies and cache when closing the browser, so all the collecting ia useless

[–] gegil@sopuli.xyz 5 points 2 weeks ago

I just browse everything in private window by default. Accepting cookies resets them after opening new window.

[–] the_riviera_kid@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

Firefox (or Librewolf) + Ublock Origin, done.

Not difficult

[–] zxqwas@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

There are addons that try to auto decline all. They do a reasonable job at it

[–] konna@sopuli.xyz 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

At least one tabloid newspaper in Finland (Iltalehti) has put the settings behind a paywall. Accept tracking or pay up.

[–] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago

Which is not allowed, and they could be sued for tiny lil fees. IF someone would sue them.

Nothing more awesome than half-assed solution that actually do nothing and help noone but increase work for everyone involved. This is peak efficiency.

[–] DuskyRo@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago
[–] TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 week ago

Self destructing cookies extension. Problem solved.

[–] Kaput@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

I set my browser to delete all cookies on exit. I suppose they only get one session worth of information. I havent researched how m much better it is. Opinions?

[–] handsoffmydata@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 week ago

The Policy: “Are you sure you don’t not want for us to not not share all your data with third party advertisers?” The Options: Not Disagree | Don’t Agree

[–] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 week ago

A great EU-solution to protect us this was. No more evil cookies..

And who would care about the gazillions of scripts that still track you hard. And the fingerprint of your browser that makes you unique-ish. And dare do disallow just one tiny script and the whole site breaks and makes your browser cry.

I miss the internet shortly before and after google came up. Just information.

[–] wabafee@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Well you eat it of course