this post was submitted on 04 Dec 2025
1315 points (99.3% liked)

Science Memes

17762 readers
1734 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] wizzor@sopuli.xyz 96 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

Pika is a real animal?

Gen 1 pokemon really are just funny colored real animals.

[–] 4am@lemmy.zip 89 points 2 weeks ago

“Ekans” is just “Snake” spelled backwards.

“Muk” is just…oh, oh god

[–] CidVicious@sh.itjust.works 26 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Pika is pronounced "pie-kuh" generally. Pikachu comes from pika pika (japanese onomatopoeia for "sparking/sparkling" usually with the connotation of clean) + chuu (sound a mouse makes/squeak).

[–] SorryQuick@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Actually it comes from pika(-tto), the onomatopoeia for a lightning strike.

[–] Cintari@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Not according to an interview by the creator of Pikachu, Atsuko Nishida:

“Since it was an Electric-type Pokémon, I thought ‘pika‘ [the expression of light flashing in Japanese].

https://web.archive.org/web/20211108083831/https://www.pokemon.com/us/pokemon-news/creator-profile-the-creators-of-pikachu/

[–] SorryQuick@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] embed_me@programming.dev 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Its light in general, not lightning

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Petter1@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Actually, name of many Pokemon are multi layered

So there is no wrong, but both right

It is the beauty of Pokemon names and even concepts

Watch some lockstin and gnoggin if interested in this topic 😇

[–] CidVicious@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago

Yeah I just think it's kind of neat how the names of English pokemon are formed in a similar way to how they are in Japanese.

[–] CidVicious@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I think these are the same root? Pika pika is used to mean clean but it's onomatopoeia for sparkling. That double word onomatopoeia construction in japanese doesn't really have a direct analogue in English I don't think.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] alekwithak@lemmy.world 14 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Voltorb, Muk, Magnemite, and Mr Mime would all like a word with you. Jynx, however, doesn't mind.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] SLVRDRGN@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

Oh they brought a lot of love alright

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

Bigger lens is better for wildlife photography and long distance shot. Animals scurry away when you try to get close, so it's best to take a picture from the distance.

[–] flora_explora@beehaw.org 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Confusingly, there is the animal in the post that is commonly called pika (Ochotona daurica). What I had to think of first was Pica pica though (the Eurasian magpie)

[–] Lembot_0005@lemy.lol 41 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

When you stare into pica, pica stares into you. Also sprach Zarathustra.

[–] ClockworkOtter@lemmy.world 34 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Casually using an amazing photo for a meme 👍

[–] HakunaHafada@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 weeks ago

A top-shelf flex.

[–] Prontomomo@lemmy.world 26 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I like the content, but seriously I’m baffled as to how this is a science meme?

[–] Jarix@lemmy.world 39 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

I would assume because it's related to educating someone about why optical lenses can give an incredible amount of detail that digital just can't compete with. But that's just a guess and that might not even be enough for this forum

[–] Obi@sopuli.xyz 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

What's a digital lens exactly?.. The only thing I can think of are in some point& shoot cameras and phones they have fake factorial zooms that are just cropping into the resolution.

[–] shneancy@lemmy.world 13 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

i'm guessing it was a brain shortcut for a "digital zoom lens"

[–] Jarix@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

Absolutely correct

[–] fossilesque@mander.xyz 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Also, because posts like this drive really informative comment sections like this thread. I promise there's a method to the madness.

[–] 14th_cylon@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

~~you people do understand it is fake, and if you zoom on the top right eye, it is not the same as bottom right, right?~~

ok, so to my surprise, it seems to be possible. the difference in the eye may be result of multiple layers of shitty jpeg compression.

the author has more pictures on his web - https://www.pjvphotography.com/Fauna/Pikas

[–] Strawberry@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 2 weeks ago

it is though

[–] Petter1@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 2 weeks ago

☺️compression did nothing wrong

You are not supposed to zoom into a compressed photo 🤭

[–] DearMoogle@lemmy.today 22 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] cassandrafatigue@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

I've seen things you people wouldn't believe. Mountains in the eye of a trailside pika, ...

[–] Midnitte@beehaw.org 5 points 2 weeks ago

Eating seeds as a pastime activity

[–] dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

moments lost, like tears in rain

good bye

now I gotta watch blade runner again dammit! RIP Rutger Olsen Hauer for that performance god DAMN!

[–] danekrae@lemmy.world 18 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

What does it say, when it sneezes?

[–] CatZoomies@lemmy.world 25 points 2 weeks ago

Tap for spoilerPi

Ka

Chuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu!

[–] motor_spirit@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago

beautiful 🤌

[–] GreatTitEnthusiast@mander.xyz 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] halfdane@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Today's risky click is presented by GreatTitEnthusiast 👀

[–] GreatTitEnthusiast@mander.xyz 7 points 2 weeks ago

Hey, I'm just hear because I heard climate change is threatening Great Tits

[–] possumparty@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Why 600mm? Because sometimes you need really good photos of squirrels.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)
[–] falseWhite@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

You can also see them directly, with your own eyes

[–] QuinnyCoded@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago

but the pika is cute >.<

[–] sirico@feddit.uk 1 points 1 week ago

Follow for more life hacks

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 week ago

Big, if true

[–] kamen@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It's not even that much of a sacrifice. There are some modern 600s that weigh less than what a typical 70-200/2.8 does. Granted, they're on the darker side, but if you have the light (supposedly you will during a hike), you don't always need an f/4.

[–] then_three_more@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Laughs in micro fourthirds.

[–] alekwithak@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Listen buddy, I spent a lot of money on my full frame, and a lot of muscle lugging it around, so I'd appreciate it if you could keep your superior sensor to yourself.

load more comments
view more: next ›