this post was submitted on 03 Dec 2025
17 points (94.7% liked)

Linux Questions

3013 readers
15 users here now

Linux questions Rules (in addition of the Lemmy.zip rules)

Tips for giving and receiving help

Any rule violations will result in disciplinary actions

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I'm betting the root of this problem is on how I originally installed the system but I would like another opinion. Or several.

Running Mint.

After analyzing the disk usage, the folder where Thunderbird is installed is completely full. I have four separate accounts in it but a single one is responsible for taking all the space available, through the imap/sent folder, which makes no sense for me, as I send relatively few messages compared with all the messages I receive.

I already considered just purging the program from my system and completely reinstall it but if I'm going to do that I'm better off doing a fresh system installation.

The system has two disks: a SSD running the system core and a HDD for the home partition. I opted to keep the system core on the SSD to speed up booting (and it worked) and used the HDD for storage because. I prefer HDDs for user files, for longevity reasons. The biggest mistake I made here was not using LVM on the disks.

Any thoughts and criticism on this is welcome.

Thank you in advance.

top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] bus_factor@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

What is the output of df -h? It's hard to guess what could be wrong without some more data.

The last 5% are by default reserved for the root user, so that's a possibility.

[–] qyron@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
Sistema de ficheiros Tamanho   Uso Livre Uso% Montado em
tmpfs                   1,4G  1,8M  1,4G   1% /run
efivarfs                128K   14K  110K  12% /sys/firmware/efi/efivars
/dev/sda3                46G   13G   31G  29% /
tmpfs                   6,8G     0  6,8G   0% /dev/shm
tmpfs                   5,0M   16K  5,0M   1% /run/lock
/dev/sda6               9,1G  4,2M  8,6G   1% /tmp
/dev/sda2               113M  6,2M  107M   6% /boot/efi
/dev/sdb1               458G   64G  371G  15% /home
/dev/sda5                32G  9,6G   21G  32% /var
tmpfs                   1,4G  132K  1,4G   1% /run/user/1000

I don't see any partition full.

[–] bus_factor@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah, those aren't full from a filesystem perspective. What exactly are you doing when it's saying it's full, and what is the exact message. Some things might have quotas independent of the space on the filesystem.

[–] qyron@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I got my first warning when trying to download some large files and at some point the browser just returned a message saying the download was aborted for not having enough space available. Nothing else.

After running a disk scan, as I know the 500GB HDD is essentially empty, is when I find out the Thunderbird folder is full. And somehow it is causing the system to flag the entire disk has full.

This is the general use computer of the house and there are more users on the system but I have the largest amount of files on it as I'm the primary user.

[–] bus_factor@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

What is "a disk scan"? Can you either copy the input/output of the command or take screenshots? This is too vague to be of much use for debugging.

[–] qyron@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 weeks ago

df -h returns the following

Sistema de ficheiros Tamanho   Uso Livre Uso% Montado em
tmpfs                   1,4G  1,8M  1,4G   1% /run
efivarfs                128K   14K  110K  12% /sys/firmware/efi/efivars
/dev/sda3                46G   13G   31G  29% /
tmpfs                   6,8G     0  6,8G   0% /dev/shm
tmpfs                   5,0M   12K  5,0M   1% /run/lock
/dev/sdb1               458G   64G  371G  15% /home
/dev/sda6               9,1G  400K  8,6G   1% /tmp
/dev/sda5                32G  9,5G   21G  32% /var
/dev/sda2               113M  6,2M  107M   6% /boot/efi
tmpfs                   1,4G  136K  1,4G   1% /run/user/1000

/home has 371G free smartctl is not returning errors on the drive has well

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Did you check dmesg for errors? It might be smart to verify it isn't a hardware issue.

Could you post screenshots?

[–] qyron@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

the dmesg output is simply huge running the command threw me a slew of messages can you point to what I should be looking at?

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] qyron@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 weeks ago

You are probably good then

[–] starkzarn 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

You haven't mentioned your distro. Are you using systemd-homed? There are some footguns there that can manifest like this.

As another poster mentioned, btrfs quotas or subvolume allocation could be a favtor as well.

[–] qyron@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 weeks ago

I always leave something to be said when I post... added to the post. Thank you.

I'm running Mint.

[–] qyron@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 weeks ago

Yes. Although recently I started getting errors with downloads, with warning of not having disk space.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

I wouldn't bother with a HDD in the future. They are slow and SSDs will last for years.

~~Anyways, could you post the output of df? It would help significantly with troubleshooting~~ Never mind, I missed your comment

[–] qyron@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 weeks ago

With the memory chips getting the sharp uptick they are going through right now? Pass. Speed is not crucial for me. I don't do any hardcore gaming nor run some speed critical apps. HDD's cover my necessities.

[–] nesc@lemmy.cafe 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Check inodes df -ih. Do you use btrfs or zfs?

[–] qyron@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)
Sistema de ficheiros Inodes  IUso ILivr UsoI% Montado em
tmpfs                  1,7M  1,2K  1,7M    1% /run
efivarfs                  0     0     0     - /sys/firmware/efi/efivars
/dev/sda3              3,0M  750K  2,2M   26% /
tmpfs                  1,7M     1  1,7M    1% /dev/shm
tmpfs                  1,7M     7  1,7M    1% /run/lock
/dev/sda6              597K    41  597K    1% /tmp
/dev/sda2                 0     0     0     - /boot/efi
/dev/sdb1               30M  133K   29M    1% /home
/dev/sda5              2,1M   94K  2,0M    5% /var
tmpfs                  348K   136  348K    1% /run/user/1000

Here is the output. I don't see anything taxed.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Maybe I'm reading this wrong but doesn't that show that you only have a 30 megabytes of space?

[–] qyron@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 weeks ago

df -h returns this

Sistema de ficheiros Tamanho   Uso Livre Uso% Montado em
tmpfs                   1,4G  1,8M  1,4G   1% /run
efivarfs                128K   14K  110K  12% /sys/firmware/efi/efivars
/dev/sda3                46G   13G   31G  29% /
tmpfs                   6,8G     0  6,8G   0% /dev/shm
tmpfs                   5,0M   12K  5,0M   1% /run/lock
/dev/sdb1               458G   64G  371G  15% /home
/dev/sda6               9,1G  320K  8,6G   1% /tmp
/dev/sda5                32G  9,5G   21G  32% /var
/dev/sda2               113M  6,2M  107M   6% /boot/efi
tmpfs                   1,4G  140K  1,4G   1% /run/user/1000
[–] nesc@lemmy.cafe 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Looks fine to me as well, so you are using ext4 and not btrfs?

[–] qyron@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 weeks ago

Yes. Still haven't tried it.