this post was submitted on 02 Dec 2025
976 points (99.1% liked)

News

33588 readers
1617 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

SECRETARY OF DEFENSE Pete Hegseth is under increasing fire for a double-tap strike, first reported by The Intercept in early September, in which the U.S. military killed two survivors of the Trump administration’s initial boat strike in the Caribbean on September 2.

The Washington Post recently reported that Hegseth personally ordered the follow-up attack, giving a spoken order “to kill everybody.” Multiple military legal experts, lawmakers, and now confidential sources within the government who spoke with The Intercept say Hegseth’s actions could result in the entire chain of command being investigated for a war crime or outright murder.

“Those directly involved in the strike could be charged with murder under the UCMJ or federal law,” said Todd Huntley, a former Staff Judge Advocate who served as a legal adviser on Joint Special Operations task forces conducting drone strikes in Afghanistan and elsewhere, using shorthand for the Uniform Code of Military Justice. “This is about as clear of a case being patently illegal that subordinates would probably not be able to successfully use a following-orders defense.”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] falseWhite@lemmy.world 183 points 1 week ago (26 children)

100% nothing will happen, or they will just get pardoned. USA is done. Kaput. All hail Nazi USA.

[–] WizardofFrobozz@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

It’s fucking comical how many Americans seem to think that the collapse of their entire legal system is just a blip and there’s a “normal” to go back to.

It’s a bit like going to see a magician- if you catch a glimpse of how the trick is done, the spell is broken. There’s no going back. Everyone is now fully aware that accountability only exists because of shared suspension of disbelief that it might not. A new administration doesn’t fix this. Your constitution and legislation has been fully exposed as lacking enforcement measures. There isn’t any coming back from that, regardless of who’s in the big chair.

[–] bold_atlas@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It's already been collapsed for years though. Normal people don't even get trials anymore. We get outrageously high bail amounts and plea-bargains (forced confessions, that's what they are) so we will spend 2 years in prison instead of 5 awaiting trial.

Want to prove your innocence even if it means spending years in pretrial jail? Guess what? They'll end up dismissing the charges a week before your trial starts because they don't think they'll get a conviction. You're not officially acquitted so the prosecutor's success rate stays high AND you still were imprisoned for years so it's a win-win for them.

load more comments (25 replies)
[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 147 points 1 week ago (6 children)

This is actually the example they use of an illegal order in the DOD manual.

Page 1117 18.3.2.1 https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23892053-dod-law-of-war-manual-june-2015-updated-july-2023/

[–] Cricket@lemmy.zip 21 points 1 week ago

Holy moly, all that's left to do is to add a picture of Hegseth and of the exploded boat to illustrate this paragraph. SMH.

[–] khepri@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago

This should be top of the thread everywhere this story is mentioned, forever.

[–] lando55@lemmy.zip 17 points 1 week ago

Today I learned the word tragicomical

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org 79 points 1 week ago (8 children)

Held liable by whom? The President who absolutely would say he agreed with it? The legislature that will talk a good game but fold before doing anything important? The courts who are owned by the parties? Or the police who want this to be SOP, and wouldn't enforce any orders for arrest?

[–] UnspecificGravity 24 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I guess some of these people expect to still be around in a couple years when there is a new administration that might feel like it's a good idea to prosecute people for crimes they committed for trump.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] RipLemmDotEE@lemmy.today 22 points 1 week ago (1 children)

UCMJ is its own system enforced by the military with its own courts. Hegeseth will probably avoid any repercussions, but holding the chain of command responsible for state sponsored murder will send a clear message about obeying illegal orders.

[–] GlitchyDigiBun@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago

And not doing so sends a different, no less clear, message...

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] stupe@lemmy.zip 44 points 1 week ago

They could be, but they won't.

[–] cerebralhawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com 40 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Won't matter if they're held liable by US law.

We need justice that is not beholden to any king or emperor (or would-be whatever). International courts should rule on this. Because local ones won't do anything.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] flandish@lemmy.world 37 points 1 week ago (1 children)

good. prison for all of them. genocidal nazis all of them. from the leader to the guy who pushed the button.

ILLEGAL ORDERS MUST BE IGNORED.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dhork@lemmy.world 33 points 1 week ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 29 points 1 week ago

Must not could

[–] bold_atlas@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Just like the Jan 6 hearings, they will drag it out for political points, but have no intention to seek actual charges, institutional change, military reform or anything.

It will just be: "Look at all the evil shit they did! Don't you wish something could be done! Oh well. Also Maduro bad m'kay, drugs bad m'kay, Hamas bad m'kay, we love troops m'kay. Hearing adjourned!"

[–] psycho_driver@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Could be, but won't. At least, not under this regime.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Head of the U.S. Military’s Southern Command Is Stepping Down, Officials Say. Adm. Alvin Holsey is leaving less than a year into his tenure, and as the Pentagon escalates attacks against boats in the Caribbean Sea.

Maybe its ethics. Maybe some folks in the chain of command have the fear of God in them. Maybe there's just better pay in the private sector and now is as good a time as any to cash out. But I suspect stories like this are going to be increasingly common in the run up to the '26 election.

Future President Pete Buttigieg will have a cabinet full of people who drew the line at double-tapping a Venezuelan fisherman. And they'll be spearheading our next Great Ethical War with... idk, Argentina or South Africa or something.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Wilco@lemmy.zip 22 points 1 week ago

He is a murderer... all of them are.

[–] demizerone@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Y'all mother fuckers ebeying in advance. These assholes will be held accountable. Call your representatives! Don't assume their power is so great because it's not!

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] SlartyBartFast@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Could be, should be, won't be

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] evenglow@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

"Respect the chain of command." - Babylon 5 TV show

Same thing Democrats said recently. Same thing Milley said last time Trump put soldiers on streets years ago. Back then Trump also said Milley should be hanged for saying it.

[–] ProfThadBach@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

I love B5 and while the show might look a bit dated now the message sure as fuck is not.

[–] MisterOwl@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago

Could.

But won't.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago

That would require the administration's own people to bring those charges.

And I can already tell you the words you're going to hear if this makes it to court. "Unlawful Combatant", a designation we created so we could ignore the rules of war while fighting in Afghanistan and Iraq. Trump declared the Venezuelan drug cartels to be terrorists. Now they're treating them like we treated the Taliban in Afghanistan.

These guys are literally just waiting for the next outrageous thing to push this one out of the news cycle.

And yeah, we've been doing airstrikes like this for 20 years.

[–] d00phy@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago

… As they should.

… But they won’t.

[–] blargle@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 week ago

Could is not news. Ever.

[–] pleasejustdie@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I worked at Fort Lewis in the RCF (Regional Correctional Facility, aka prison) and we had an Army soldier who got 3 years for 1st degree murder because he mercy killed a combatant after they got covered in white phosphorous. Literally everyone was like "how the fuck do you only get 3 years for first degree murder?" and then when they read his court documents were like "what the fuck, you got screwed and obviously everyone knew it..." They legally determined that at the moment they were no longer fighting back they became non-combatants and to kill a non-combatant instead of rendering aid is murder. Since the judge and jury agreed that it did violate the law, but hoped that if they were ever in that combatant's shoes, they would want someone to do to them what this soldier did, so yeah, guilty, but sentenced to the bare minimum allowed.

I know for 100% fact there is precedent already. But that is rules for thee, not for them, so I highly doubt we'll see anything happen. I'm sure they'll claim they need immunity because they were operating under special rules of engagement or some bullshit, and it will take years and lots of lawyers and in the end it'll drag on until its forgotten about and gets quietly dismissed somewhere.

[–] tomi000@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago

"held liable" means some bad press in 'radical left' media at this point, right?

[–] Bubbaonthebeach@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 week ago

Which means, as the law is being followed in the US right now, only the plebs at the bottom might be held responsible.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 13 points 1 week ago (2 children)

What absolute moron would obey that order?

I could see how maybe you could believe there was justification for the initial strike but there can be no justification for killing people who are now defenceless. Although why not just board the vessel and take everyone into custody, why instantly resort to deadly force, did they have information that the people on the boat were heavily armed or otherwise able to threaten a US naval vessel?

[–] notgivingmynametoamachine@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I won’t claim to have researched it myself, but I’ve seen about a dozen different people quote the section of military law that talks about illegal orders that are so blatant you don’t need to check or think, they’re illegal, and the example they use is “firing upon the shipwrecked”.

As in, the order to fire upon the shipwrecked should be immediately known to every Navy personnel as blatantly illegal as a precondition of their service.

If you’re performing the example for an illegal order, you’re executing illegal orders.

Edit: and I’m realizing now I responded to the wrong person.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] yeather@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 week ago (5 children)

50/50 they pardon everyone or Trump uses this opportunity to forcefully retire more generals and get Hegseth out.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 week ago

Sure, sure, right after we convict Bush, Rice et al., for their war crimes in Iraq.

[–] xxce2AAb@feddit.dk 12 points 1 week ago

That's what should happen, but I won't be holding my breath.

[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

And they should be, MAGA is a terrorist organization

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

See that’s why they make everyone pull the trigger when they commit murder. Now they’re all complicit, and they have to work for trump and keep him in power. Because if someone with a spine that actually follows the law and constitution gets into office they will face court-martial.

But we all know that they’ll just get raked over the coals by some committee and told to retire, if that, should a dem take office.

[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

Those asshats will manage to walk. The ICC should step in so they can only travel between the USA and fucking Russia.

[–] apftwb@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Does being convicted of a war crime or murder make you ineligible to be Secretary of Defense?

[–] ArtVandelay@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago

Exactly the same amount as being a 34 time convicted felon makes you ineligible to be president

[–] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Ooh, I did not consider the possibility of a military court case on this. That could be a game-changer.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›