this post was submitted on 02 Dec 2025
204 points (95.5% liked)

Fediverse

38282 readers
99 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, Mbin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I’ve been thinking a lot recently about PeerTube, Loops, Bandwagon, and other platforms in the Fediverse that are geared around artists. I might get flamed for this, and you’re welcome to disagree, but I think the network is in dire need of having support for commerce.

Not “Big Capitalism” commerce, but the ability for people to buy and sell things, support projects, and commission their favorite creators to keep making more stuff.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Eyekaytee@aussie.zone 57 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

super necessary if we expect anyone (outside of hobbyists) to even think of putting their content on the fediverse first or at the same time as other platforms

[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 47 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It‘s a two sided blade, but I get what you mean.

On one hand monetization is the thing that ruins platforms for me because it invites grifters and even decent people are becoming obsessed with numbers. Most people see content creation only as a career path and not something to do for fun anymore. I find that depressing at times.

On the other hand we currently live in a capitalist world and have to play by those rules to some extend. I learned most of the things I do for a living from Youtube because professionals do Blender tutorials as a side gig or even for a living. There probably wouldn‘t be nearly as much knowledge out there without this motivator. Or at least not in this form that is easy to understand for me. The official Blender documentation usually isn‘t the first place I‘m searching through when I have a problem.

So I see where you‘re coming from but it‘s a fine line between helpful and loathsome.

[–] Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

What if there was a federated platform for supporting the channels you like? Maybe something like Patreon? Or how about some sort of merch store for people who can sell the things they make?

[–] Cracks_InTheWalls@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Maybe something like Patreon

Well we do have Liberapay. It's not perfect in that it only addresses the payment angle (with the issue around processors noted by the other reply still present), and doesn't allow for subscriber only content, but it's something.

I think between something like this and a few other things (dunno much about PeerTube etc. or if 'private' posts are a thing where you could maintain a 'mailing list' of donor accounts and grant them access to exclusive stuff), it's possible to cobble something together. Lot of management would be required in the backend compared to more mainstream approaches at this point, though.

Just thinking outloud, there's probably stuff I'm not considering here. Re: an eStore...idk, only thing I can think of is a DIY webstore relying on emails and money transfer services if trying to avoid mainstream eCommerce stuff like Shopify or whatever (same way people used to sell pot on the clearweb back in the very early days, lol).

[–] meldrik@lemmy.wtf 2 points 1 week ago

You would still need a payment processor, which takes a huge chunk of the cake in fees.

[–] Cooper8@feddit.online 33 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Client side support for a tipping link (Koffee, Patreon, crypto wallet, whatever the user's choice is) that is built in to the UI would go a long way.

[–] rimu@crust.piefed.social 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] Cooper8@feddit.online 5 points 1 week ago

Nice, I dont use Peertube as often as I'd like because I haven't found the right creators for me. Good to know they already have this, should be an example to the rest of the platforms

[–] deadsuperhero@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

PeerTube's support button is, at best, a lightbox that holds a text string. It's fine for highlighting links, but you still kind of have to dance around with having an account in another system to make the payment.

[–] poVoq@slrpnk.net 24 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I have high hopes for GNU Taler in that regard, as it is in theory super easy to include in any website and makes tipping small sums very feasible.

But in reality it is bogged down by bureocractic hurdles on the banking side, and I am starting to lose a bit of hope due to perpetual delays even after some banks promised to support it as part of an EU grant via Nlnet.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago

Non-Gated Microtransactions in Peertube would be pretty cool. I don't know that it would amount to anything, but it would be a damn good start

[–] Olap@lemmy.world 16 points 2 weeks ago (15 children)

Keep it away is my strong advice. Having to deal with banks will mean having to deal with regulations. Having to deal with crypto means having to deal with crytpo bros. Having to deal with paywalls is a barrier to entry

The internet was a better place without money touching everything!

[–] JohnnyEnzyme@piefed.social 12 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I don't have strong feelings either way, but money does touch everything, overtly or not, when it comes to civilisation. Time spent volunteering on Fediverse projects is effectively money spent (at least to some degree), and instances cost time & fees to maintain.

But I guess to argue against myself-- you have to think that without some kind of ongoing responsible oversight, then the worst aspects of capitalism might predictably find a way to screw it all up if left to its own devices. Then again, maybe the scale involved makes that less likely. *shrug*

[–] Olap@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah, I get it. Volunteers' time should be valued. But, there is more to valuing than money is my counter: authority, respect, community engagement, and a fraternal/paternal element

I salute all mods. And I pay for admins

[–] JohnnyEnzyme@piefed.social 2 points 1 week ago

I mean, you're kind of lifting my point in to a broader area that I wasn't speaking to at the time.

Of course I agree with all that you said. But I was talking strictly in the context of OP's framework.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] Goodlucksil@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Patreon kinda fits that, but I'm not sure about their open-sourceness

[–] deadsuperhero@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

OpenCollective is a pretty solid open source contender in my experience. It's not perfect, but it's definitely workable.

[–] Cris_Color@piefed.world 15 points 1 week ago

Really happy to see this discussion here. Here is no "correct" path here, but is deeply important that the one we choose is intentional and thoughtfully considered by the folks these platforms serve

Both their audience and their contributors.

[–] EfreetSK@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

Maybe it's just nostalgia but in my opinion, with youtube it went all to shit the moment the money started to be involved. Algorithm chasing, advertisement, reactive content, sponsors, quickly generated videos, ... and all the other shit.

So if monetization, then let's try to avoid same mistakes

[–] hendrik@palaver.p3x.de 12 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I'm not sure if this translates to the content creators. There's many of them whom I really like to watch who do (or did) Youtube as a business model. Tom Scott being one example or Derek Muller (Veritasium). I'm subscribed to many more. Simplicissimus and their yet better second channel (in German). We wouldn't have those without monetization. The platform of course went shit over time. Fortunately my Ad blocker still works and thanks to Sponsorblock my experience is fairly alright... But personally - I'm split on this question. We had quite the amount of entertainment before monetization but I think a large amount of quality content also arrived after that, and because of it. Those people would be working some office job today if it wasn't to Youtube. And I (and the world) would miss out.... On the other hand we got MrBeast, a lot of fake cooking videos...

[–] JohnnyEnzyme@piefed.social 11 points 2 weeks ago

One seemingly enormous difference is that YT is a for-profit platform owned by a huge business (Google), not a decentralised network run by many small volunteers. FWIW.

[–] Eyekaytee@aussie.zone 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I don't think it was money that changed youtube, i think it was the algo, it now promotes viral content that for some reason has a persons face in the thumbnail with an exaggerated face :O

[–] deadsuperhero@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah, the YouTube algorithm itself is a huge problem. I think about the fact that there are entire slop studios out there trying to ride algorithm trends, churning out crap to push onto YouTube Kids so that they'll do numbers and make a lot of money from it.

Like, I have nothing against the concept of a recommendation algorithm itself, but the relationship I just described is nightmare fuel.

[–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

A free and direct tip system that doesn't force you to use credit cards would be quite useful

[–] ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I tried to use a gift certificate to donate to dbzer0 last night. It didn't work because of a zip code field. I just want to look at cat pictures and make a snarky comment every so often without a facist paramilitary kicking in my front door. Fuck me, right?

[–] mPony@kbin.earth 1 points 1 week ago

If you're going to spend money at all then you'll just have to give some of it (or all of it) to a totally overpowered construct of evil. If you don't then they might start to lose power, and boy howdy they just can not have that happen. Oh, and make sure you continue to distrust your fellow man because if you all start working together you might decide that things should change.

[–] inconel@lemmy.ca 10 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Artists need exposure before monetization imho, which currently fedi lacks severely. So discoverability is what I suggest as priority to work on.

That said, algorithm free is the draw of fedi as well and I personally don't want my feed filled with excessive ad or self promo spam. Getting the right middle ground will be tricky.

[–] GaryGhost@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Where do you think would be an affordable place to advertise the fediverse?

I think the fediverse should advertise it's self in a simple slogan that can lead the normal user into a more in depth explanation of what, why and how. When I first discovered Lemmy, I didn't know what the fediverse was, it felt really strange

[–] astro_ray@piefed.social 9 points 2 weeks ago

After seeing your post on akkoma, I think I understand your point even better.
I want to support artists and would definitely buy music on fedi. I would rather just watch hobbyist make videos for peertube and especially for loops. But if it means that it would help the platform stay afloat I am way more open to the idea of monetization beyond just donations.

[–] OpticalMoose@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Thanks for bringing it up. Nobody likes to talk about money in the Fediverse, but it's a fact of life.

I've stopped making Peertube videos lately mainly because I got tired of donating. We've got to come up with a better solution.

[–] Bababasti@feddit.org 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Money being considered to be a “fact of life“ is the sad part here. It’s not a natural system that just is and we cannot change. That doesn’t mean I disagree with you. I‘d be upset not getting a paycheck at the end of this month and rely on money like everyone else because we live in this late stage capitalist hell. But I refuse to accept any monetary system as a natural given, that’s probably all i‘m trying to say.

If Fediverse software starts encouraging monetization, I don't think the userbase will even maintain the current strength.

[–] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

If you allow artists to display their work in various communities along with the ability to post links in their profiles, but you restrict actual posts to disallow self-promotion, it's the best of both worlds, IMO.

In other words, if you can't include self-promotion in your community posts, but everyone knows you have the links in your profile, it attracts less grifters and keeps the feed clean, while allowing anyone interested to contact a poster directly or ask them promotional questions via DMs.

That said, hosting a full-fledged marketplace is not a good idea, IMO. There are laws and banks involved, which mean lawyers and taxes, and volunteer management does not work for that. There are already marketplaces that do that well, and allowing artists to post their own links of choice in their profiles will let them steer actual business to other platforms, while keeping the fediverse for display, review, share and critique. My opinion, anyway.

[–] moonshadow@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 week ago

Where'd my other comment go? Editorial censorship takes this from "a really bad idea" to a super fucked up attempt at poisoning this beautiful place with the worship of wealth

[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Part of the headache here is that this situation inherently props up a few monopolistic platforms, rather than allowing people to use whatever payment system is available in their own countries. Some of this can be worked around using cryptocurrencies – famously, the Mitra project leverages Monero for this very purpose, although I'm told it now can accept other forms of payment as well.

Hell yeah, I didn't know about Mitra. It sounds like it's a Patreon esque kind of deal with what the payments part is for.

[–] deadsuperhero@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Silverpill might not like me making this comparison, but its form and function are shockingly similar to OnlyFans.

[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago

Sounds like an additional reason to be doing it in a way where participants can't be debanked by payments middlemen

[–] widowdoll@ttrpg.network 1 points 1 week ago

There is nothing stopping anyone from running ads and making deals with creators.

There is nothing stopping creators and hosters from accepting payments via Monero.

Also, we should stop trying to figure out how to make other people money.

[–] muntedcrocodile@hilariouschaos.com 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Been thinking similarly. Really think it would be the perfect place for crypto given its decentralised nature but the fediverse hates that. Also think we need to solve the portable identity problem first. We can solve the portable identity with did the same way ATProto solved it and blockchain are an excellent backend for that. Ideally we would use XMR as its objectively the best blockchain and objectively better than fiat.

[–] deadsuperhero@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

You might be interested in trying out Nostr. I know it's more Bitcoin Lightning focused, which admittedly is not for everybody, but they've managed to make a lot of stuff work when it comes to paying one another.

In the technical sense, Nostr is really great.

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago

People pay money to the ISP. Usually too much money. ISP should distribute monies to content providers and leave the users alone.

load more comments
view more: next ›