this post was submitted on 01 Dec 2025
59 points (96.8% liked)

Ask Lemmy

36045 readers
1253 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Broadly speaking, you probably agree with the large majority of the views commonly attributed to whichever group you identify with - what are the exceptions? Something that if you mention without a caveat immediately makes people jump to conclusions or even attack you?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TheLeadenSea@sh.itjust.works 29 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

I think that gender dysphoria is a mental illness, as it causes mental distress if not alleviated with transition, but that it's not shameful to have it any more than it's shameful to have autism, conversion therapy has been scientifically proven not to work, and just as people with diabetes manage their condition with insulin, transition is the best way to manage it so people with it can live happy lives.

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 16 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

As a trans person yes, absolutely the anguish we feel for not being comfortable in our bodies is 100% mental illness. And people get upset because we see mental illness as a bad thing, a personal failure, instead of a condition to be treated.

Doctors have decided that transitioning, while it doesn't fix the problem of people not being born as their preferred gender, is much healthier treatment for the individual and society so that we can try to live happier lives where we get to feel as comfortable as cis people naturally feel.

[–] napkin2020@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

gender dysphoria is a mental illness

I think that's the general consensus.

[–] TheLeadenSea@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I seem to constantly interact with people decrying the 'transmedicalist perspective'

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

yeah it's a body dysphoria. there are lots of types of them.

[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 26 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

I don't hate AI. It's fine. I don't love it either, but it's neat and often useful.

[–] Kataelyna@lemmy.world 13 points 2 weeks ago

Just gonna vent a little, don't mind me. I don't hate AI. I hate how it's being used. In a vacuum, AI is fine. But we don't live in a vacuum, we live in a capitalist hellscape where everyone saw how AI was going to be abused even before corporations started jumping on every chance they got to do so. Now we're stuck in the timeline where the public consensus is that using AI for any reason at all is seen as fundamentally unethical. People are zealously anti-AI and the nail is only getting pounded in further with new reasons to hate it appearing every other day. And it didn't have to be this way. Photography didn't try to pass itself off as painting, it had time to develop into its own art form. But AI didn't. Out the gate, it was being used deceptively, and continuously became worse. People want to abolish AI as a whole, but it isn't the problem. The problems run way deeper. Our world is a sinking boat and AI is showing us where all the leaks are. Lack of education, lack of access to mental health professionals, those in power using every chance they get to screw over the working class by cutting every corner. Any new technology in any form that can be used to exploit people, WILL be used to exploit people. The hate on AI may be justified but it's too generalized and unfocused to bring about any meaningful change. There needs to be regulation, but I fear that any laws that are passed will only benefit the rich and horrible.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Zonetrooper@lemmy.world 26 points 2 weeks ago (12 children)

That Lemmy can be just as bigoted, hostile, and close-minded as the sites it set out to replace; it drives out views which aren't in line with the gestalt majority. This thread, then, mostly gets answers which are on the mildest end because those who actually hold opinions out of step with the majority know damn well not to speak up, or, well... be immediately othered.

[–] Godort@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 weeks ago

Turns out that people are assholes regardless of platform

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] Chippys_mittens@lemmy.world 20 points 2 weeks ago

Im a liberal who loves guns and offensive comedy.

[–] Zorque@lemmy.world 15 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

I think violence should be the last resort, not the first, when speaking of revolution.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] mech@feddit.org 15 points 2 weeks ago

I believe privately owned cars and on-street parking should be banned in cities, except for very few regulated exceptions, and replaced with municipal car sharing.

[–] lolola@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 1 week ago (4 children)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Tedesche@lemmy.world 14 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

I’m a Democrat who values the 2nd amendment and doesn’t think we should just ban guns in the U.S. Stronger regulations and safety measures? Sure, absolutely. But I do think people should have the right to own and use firearms for recreation, hunting, personal protection, etc.

[–] FridaySteve@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (7 children)

I think you'll find that most people by a wide margin agree that prohibition of anything generally doesn't work, and what they are looking for is regulations and enforcement.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 weeks ago

I agree up to the point where the amendment is pointed at as disallowing reasonable regulation. If that's the case, end 2A. But my goal is regulation, not abolishment. If 2A folks (mainly the Supreme Court here) can accept regulation existing in parallel with 2A, then I'm happy.

I'm mainly thinking about preventing school shootings and domestic violence and murder, so restrictions of some sort on mental health / violent history.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] danciestlobster@lemmy.zip 13 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Having children is borderline unethical given the capitalist hellscape they will be born into, the relatively high likelihood that they will not be able to live to old age due to risk of large parts of the planet becoming uninhabitable with climate change, and considering that reduced birth rates is the most ethical path to a lower population on the planet, which, though technically not a strict requirement of a greener future, certainly makes it a lot easier.

No shade for any kids living today or parents who choose to have them despite the above. I understand why people do it and I don't blame anyone for it. But it is worth pointing out that current birth rates in most countries are not sustainable, and the seemingly constant fearmongering about falling birthrates in places where it's low needs to go away. Yes, it's bad for the economy if the new generation is smaller than their parents. That's a problem with the system and its design (one of many), and not at all a rationale for having kids.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] WatDabney@sopuli.xyz 12 points 2 weeks ago (7 children)

My anarchism.

Anarchism in general makes me the other when dealing with most people, but the specifics of my views on it also generally make me the other when dealing with most "anarchists." (I oppose any and all attempts to institute anarchism - I believe it will arise organically or not at all - and I similarly reject any and all stipulations regarding what sort of standards, norms or systems may, may not, must or must not be a part of an anarchistic society),

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] faythofdragons@slrpnk.net 12 points 1 week ago (3 children)

That having a better education is directly tied to income levels, so talking down to 'idiots' is actually some bougie bullshit.

[–] angstylittlecatboy@reddthat.com 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Lemmy is a website full of people who are left-populists on paper, but hate the population.

The average Lemmite should never be in charge of anything that their IT degree doesn't qualify them for.

[–] Delphia@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Lemmy wants the baby without the labor pains.

"Destroy Capitalism!"

"But what about the millions who will die in the ensuing chaos!?!"

"Well dont do it that way!"

"Which way then?"

"DESTROY CAPITALISM!"

Yeah the system is fucked and definitely needs change, but its either gradual or violent and as someone who came up with rough crowds in rough places. Most people arent cut out for when the actual violence starts.

[–] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

practical and pragmatic reforms are boring. good policy making is boring.

hence why nobody gets excited by it. it's much more exciting to sit around daydream about the revolution than get involved in community or political groups or read public policy white papers that report the cause and effect of policies in a complex manner.

I used to work in public policy. It was really cool, until you realize nobody gives a fuck about making the world better. especially the politicans. all they can about is riling people up emotionally.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Perspectivist@feddit.uk 11 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

In my personal case, especially among the people I hang with here, my positive attitude toward generative AI seems like one of the major ones. Many people really don't seem to like it when someone mentions enjoying using these tools.

[–] Nemo@slrpnk.net 10 points 2 weeks ago

Hey, props for separating your question and response, though.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 11 points 2 weeks ago

"Pro-gun" - am left-of-center, anti-estsblishment, progressive US Democrat, people probably assume I'm far-right if I just say that no context

"反共" ("Anti-CCP") - Amongst Mainland Chinese, they'd probably look at me like the classroom "troublemaker", even my parents don't like me talking shit about CCP at home, we don't even live in China. Someone from a Chinese Lemmy instance probably assumed I was a white dude that hated China and Chinese people and asked why I "hated China". I had to use pinyin to type my response in Chinese, my native language, explaning I'm ethnic Chinese and born in mainland China and I only hate the party/government. Their response afterwards was quite "chill", very understanding. Amongst westerners, if I say I'm anti-CCP, they'd probably assume I'm a conservative lol, nah fam, fuck the rightwing radical lunatics and fuck tankies

Me prefering visual media over books - Lemmy seems to overwhelmingly like books better, for me, nah, partial aphantasia, hard to imagine things like someone elses thoughts, I can picture my memories quite well tho...

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I hate being drunk as well as being around others who are drunk. So yeah, I'm real fun at parties.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Danitos@reddthat.com 11 points 2 weeks ago (9 children)

I think trans athletes should be able to compete only in their assigned gender at birth category, if the sport is gender-segregated.

[–] Acamon@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Yeah, I got into a discussion on this topic and my suggestion is that sports split on other categories, not just gender. Boxing already does weight classes, which is good, more sports should do that. Can't we have sports for people under 5'8"? I'm sure there's lots of shortkings who'd love to compete seriously in a league where there height wasnt an detriment.

This approach seemed to offend both sides of the trans sports debate.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I think sports governing bodies should be able to determine this for themselves and their particular sport. But that's a little too pragmatic for a lot of folks.

But yeah, this gets you labeled an anti-trans bigot these days. Despite the fact practically speaking the particularities are involve really can't be generalized. In some cases there will be a unfair advantage, in others, not.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago

Men aren't the enemy of feminism and equality. It doesn't matter what any man has done to you, being a bigot doesn't fix it.

There are real problems in the world that benefit from attention. And most people prefer to waste their energy being mad at made up shit designed to make them hate their neighbors.

[–] toomanypancakes@piefed.world 9 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

I'm a militant ethical vegan. I basically don't talk about it unless directly asked, because it's probably a fight otherwise.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Cracks_InTheWalls@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (14 children)

Religion and spirituality, broadly considered, are not inherently evil. That organized religion can justify great evils is a function of human weakness, nothing more.

Then again, this is coupled with a 'there is no god but that we create ourselves/god has no material existence, but is no less powerful for that'' POV, which is admittedly a weird one that I've been pulling at for a bit. Nothing to do with the nature of our reality or first causes, everything to do with our relationship to reality.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] paultimate14@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)
  1. Bigotry and prejudice is always bad, even if it's not against a "protected class". Hating on white people, straight people, cis people, men, or anyone else for the way they were born, what their ancestors did makes the world a worse place. Heck, "white" itself is a nebulous concept that changes over time and is different depending on which racist you're talking to. Just because someone resembles your oppressor does not make them your enemy.

  2. Kind of related, but I don't broadly judge categories of things. I was at a party recently and someone asked me if I liked anime, and I responded that I like some anime. Most of it I don't like, but that's not specific to anime. In my experience, roughly 80-90% of all media is somewhere between "garbage" and "mediocre", and it's the 10-20% at the top that I look for. A lot of my favorite bands happen to be metal, but I'm not going to like every band that uses distorted guitars.

Perhaps another way of phrasing it is that I usually find that the parameters which define genre are often separate from the parameters that determine my personal enjoyment.

My theory is that most people are more concerned with the social groups around media than the media itself.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] TBi@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I keep getting downvoted because I advocate always voting left. Even if currently the democrats aren’t left wing, they are more left than Republicans. And if you keep voting for the most left candidate then over time they’ll keep shifting more and more left. Republicans will learn they’ll never win unless they start moving left so they’ll move left, then the Democrats will move more left.

Letting republicans win because the current democrat isn’t left enough is, IMHO, stupid.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] michaelmrose@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

In America its still not ok to be an atheist. Truly weird that it is ok to be part of several different mutually exclusive cults who all believe things that if they were not connected to a proper religion would get you laughed at but if you don't have a cult its not ok.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Believing in facts and reality over ideology and idealism.

And as an extension of that, focusing what people do, not what they say they do or want to do.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] king_comrade@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Well I guess it's that I have a difficult time understanding trans folk. My belief is that we should be working towards accepting and loving our bodies regardless of how they are formed, with all of their flaws intact. I feel complicated towards cosmetic surgery as a result of this belief.
Obligatory caveat: I still love trans people, you're ALL valid and I continue to learn from you.

[–] michaelmrose@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

People that live as their chosen gender are happier. People who don't are much more likely to kill themselves. Hard to argue with that.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›