this post was submitted on 01 Dec 2025
627 points (96.6% liked)

Not The Onion

18925 readers
746 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] thatonecoder@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Definitely Not The Onion material. Heck, you could almost convince me that this is The Onion.

[–] Thedogdrinkscoffee@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 week ago

The Onion ate the GOP.

[–] moonshadow@slrpnk.net 8 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I've been seeing a lot of weird culture war coverage around this, even more than usual these days. Big fan of cheap, simple, accessible technology and tools. Cars are tools. Less components and less complexity means they are cheaper to produce and maintain. Bring back the econobox, the car I'm hype for is the electric equivalent of a 94 Corolla

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (13 children)

If we took every conservative on the planet and put them on an island together, how long do you think it would take before the cannibalism and incest kicked in?

[–] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 7 points 1 week ago

Lol you're assuming they aren't doing that now?

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 5 points 1 week ago

It would start before they got dropped off.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] CyLith@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Cars in some ways are too coddling, giving people a false sense of safety. All these new features like lane keeping and blind spot warnings make people drive with reckless abandon.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

They were driving with reckless abandon before...

Maybe the one thing I could see is people letting go of the steering to do something thanks to lane assist, but those same people were thigh-driving before, and I might trust the system more...

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Sirdubdee@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Tbh, it would be kind of nice if sensors weren’t put in easily damaged areas of cars. They’re part of why bumpers and tailgates are so much more expensive. I wonder if cars could have all the safety features using a couple little LIDAR and camera packages instead of chips on every piece of plastic.

[–] Entertainmeonly@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

My question is, why does the sensor cost so much? 🤔

[–] BanMe@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Well you take a 30¢ sensor and put a GM part number on it and magically poof it costs $300.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Buy motorcycles. Problem solved.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Echolynx@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Ah yes, it's definitely the regulations that are making those costs go up, not tariffs or CEO paychecks.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Yes Ted Cruz I totally believe that if they got rid of these Safety Systems cars would magically get cheaper. No one should doubt that for a second Ted Cruz. There's no way they'll just get rid of the safety system and then pocket the extra the proceeds. Ted Cruz would never be for that I'm sure.

[–] Mediocre_Bard@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Bitch, what?

Pay people more money.

[–] wowwoweowza@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (7 children)

I’m sure others in the thread are having a tough time embracing that they agree with Crus a little on this.

Stop shoving shot down our throats. That’s what I want to say to car companies.

ZERO computers!

I want MANUAL WINDOWS!

Manual locks.

ZERO SCREENS!!

I drive the last car mass produced with manual windows and manual locks.

It has 150k miles. Runs great.

There is zero tracking agents on it.

It’s just a car.

I was thinking about this the other day. I don’t need a car that goes over 40mph. I could get to work and get home. A literal Model T would do.

We need to look backwards for common sense.

[–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago (4 children)

What do you have against electric windows and locks?

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Devconsole@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago

The average Lemmy user seems to want more dead car owners.

Also, this thread has a lot of people voicing their opinions about what they want in a car. I too would prefer a much more basic auto for a cheaper price. But what do normal people actually want? They want all the bullshit. Auto makers also make great money on the bullshit, so they want to sell it to us. They also make great money when the bullshit breaks so they make more money on the back end.

[–] hardcoreufo@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (4 children)

The mandatory safety features are required because the mandatory fuel economy features mean more aero dynamic cars with worse visibility. We have mandatory fuel economy on cars so dumb big ass trucks can just guzzle gas like there's no tomorrow. We can't have regular sized trucks that get decent fuel economy for some reason that has to do with chickens.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] deathbird@mander.xyz 4 points 1 week ago

Qhy are cars more expensive?

I mean last I checked they fall under the category of "everything".

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›