this post was submitted on 26 Nov 2025
1390 points (99.6% liked)

memes

18449 readers
2350 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MyDarkestTimeline01@ani.social 144 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

It's so dumb. Just let people rate it with the five stars. They're so gun-ho with the algorithm let it do its job.

[–] MountingSuspicion@reddthat.com 125 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

They don't want you knowing what other people think of the video. It's just about what you think of the video. Much easier to have an algorithmically perfect echo chamber if everyone is privately rating things and has no idea what others think about them.

[–] relic__@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Wouldn't the simplest solution be to only expose the other ratings after you rate?

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago

Well it isn't beneficial for the company because people might realize they hold unpopular opinions and the company wants to be able to control the people's opinions regardless of popularity, that way they can keep users on the site engaging with that content for longer.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 62 points 2 weeks ago

It's all bots anyway

The thumbs up/thumbs down thing was fine too.

[–] abfarid@startrek.website 12 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I'm pretty sure that 99% of the time 1 and 5 stars options were used, so like/dislike is enough. There isn't much point in including a "I have no strong feelings one way or another" button.

[–] MotoAsh@piefed.social 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Sure there is: A known quantity is always better than an unknown quantity. Though would be far more informative if rating was mandatory, or otherwise defaulted to 3 stars or some such.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] henfredemars 88 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The final stage is not caring at all what you think user. Only consume.

[–] AtariDump@lemmy.world 78 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] MeatPilot@sh.itjust.works 38 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (4 children)

Great movie btw. But this just gave me the perfect idea for an ad blocker, that would replace all the ads with these type of signs.

Someone smarter than, get on it!

[–] Hoimo@ani.social 13 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

https://www.reddit.com/r/Adblock/comments/70xaqa/a_they_live_adblocker_details_in_comments/

This uses Catblock with a custom image set, but Catblock hasn't been updated in 6 years, so I don't know how well it still works. Anyway, if Catblock won't work, we have to find a blocker that allows for some customization and then fit those "They Live" images in.

(I'm trying to get Catblock to work, but somehow I can't find any pages that even load ads? I think the pihole is blocking the scripts that would load the ads.)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] IronBird@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] ArtVandelay@lemmy.world 16 points 2 weeks ago

They Live (1988)

[–] affenlehrer@feddit.org 5 points 2 weeks ago

I'm almost sure I've actually seen that implemented somewhere

[–] sfxrlz@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 weeks ago

Like reverse google glasses ?

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 56 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

The stars used to tell the company if you thought the video quality was good.

The stars now tell the company how to tailor a version of reality specifically to what you want to see and feel.

[–] RogerMeMore@reddthat.com 10 points 2 weeks ago

"Oh man, I remember those days when the stars actually meant something! Now they're just trying to push their own agenda on us."

[–] criss_cross@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

“Amy Schumer isn’t hated by Netflix users. It’s the star system that’s wrong. “

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 55 points 2 weeks ago

Then you start watching mostly your subscription list and they get angry their fancy algorithm isn't working.

[–] jazzkoalapaws@ttrpg.network 50 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

There's a war on negative feedback.

It's not good for business.

Now be happy.

[–] Credibly_Human@lemmy.world 15 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

The thing is, people themselves outside of business motives hate negativity.

People regularly get angry at others for bringing up criticisms of everything from foods to their favourite media products.

Even decades ago they'd give them names like negative Nancy, and within social settings the worst people often can win by weaponizing civility to quell legitimate backlash against immoral actions.

I mean, fuck, think about how many stories you've heard of people who have been the victims of sexual assault, who get told by normal people to shut up and whose experiences were diminished because it harshed other peoples mellow?

People suck, and one of the biggest reasons people suck, is they would prefer a harmful peaceful positivity than a tumultuous improvement causing negativity.

I think these companies are hooking into these human flaws in ways that hurt us, and benefit them with information asymmetry.

I don't think we can properly fix these flaws without somehow getting normal people to acknowledge that negativity is not just good, but vitally important.

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

people themselves outside of business motives hate negativity.

I think these companies are hooking into these human flaws in ways that hurt us, and benefit them with information asymmetry.

Oh, companies know. Social media have definitive data that show most users engage on anger. That's why it's in their core interest to promote rage baits and disinformation. More engagements means more traffic. More traffic means more advertisers. More advertisers means more revenues.

Hell, even before social media, news tends to report more on negative news than positive ones. Because bad news is tantamount to hearing gossips, and we all love gossips. I know many of us will say bad news makes us sad, and yet we still tune in to any news.

People regularly get angry at others for bringing up criticisms of everything from foods to their favourite media products.

Kind of on a tangent, I notice this as well that some people seem more predisposed to negative thinking. I think it's just hardwired into them. Although, I have to say, in my field of work, negative thinkers tend to have good attention to detail. Being suspicious and mindful all the time, they will check every nooks and crannies, and examining and scanning for almost everything. It is a good trait to a limited degree, but it could impair relationships both at work and outside, if one is too suspicious and distrustful of everyone.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Entertainmeonly@lemmy.blahaj.zone 41 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

5 star rating are actually 4 star ratings with a free 20% boost.

[–] Randelung@lemmy.world 24 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Hate it. Gave my employer a bad review, 1-2 stars in most categories, and the average was still a 3.7?? I have to adjust my intuition when reading star reviews. Apparently 3.5 is bottom of the barrel.

[–] tuff_wizard@aussie.zone 19 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The good news is: that reviews wasn’t really accurate.

The bad news is: that review wasn’t really anonymous.

[–] Randelung@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago

My last day is Friday. :)

I've tried my best during the last seven years to make a change, both by lobbying upper management and introducing change in my team. Nothing stuck, nobody besides my team mates cared. So I hope it's not really anonymous. I'm clinging to the illusion they'll somehow take it to heart now that it's public, for the betterment of the team mates I leave behind.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] pulsewidth@lemmy.world 37 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Next step: you must have a camera enabed to use YouTube so we can directly monitor your facial expressions with AI✨ and save you precious rating time to recommend you better videos!

But really so we can ensure you're watching the ads.
[–] Zink@programming.dev 13 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I know I am not alone here, because Lemmy and all, but holy god damn does that little AI sparkle trigger me more than any other AI term or image.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world 27 points 2 weeks ago

They just hiding performance metrics because they know it affects viewing habits, right?

[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 21 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

All I want to say is:

I rarely like any video so much that I want to give it a solid 👍

Its also pretty rare for 👎

But I'll rate stuff on a scale of ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ every day of the week.

Also, hiding 👎 is completely brain-dead stupid.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] ramble81@lemmy.zip 14 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Anyone else notice that thumbs down is back, there just isn’t a counter. I’ve seen it for a few weeks now.

[–] lugal@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 2 weeks ago

I'm pretty sure it never was different tho I usually use a plugin that shows thumbs-downs. It's basically guessing for new videos so it's not really useful but still

[–] M137@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago

I thought it never left? They just didn't show the number of dislikes to anyone other than the channel who made the video (without plugins, revanced etc).

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

I'd be surprised if it did anything.

[–] ZoteTheMighty@lemmy.zip 12 points 2 weeks ago

My favorite is Amazon streaming that has a "rating for your taste out of 5 stars", but they don't want it to point out that most of their catalog is shit, so everything from Shawshank Redemption to Movie 43 are "4.5 stars for you"

[–] lugal@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I get the first step. You don't watch a video and have the urge to tell the world that it was neither good nor bad. I think they moved to stars because everyone just gave 1 or 5 eitherway

[–] damnedfurry@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah, that's not definitely not on YouTube, the final 'star score' was effectively indicative only of the ratio of the 5-stars to the 1-stars. The infinitesimal minority that would actually thoughtfully rate 2, 3, or 4 stars made no difference at all.

[–] DupaCycki@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago

Corporation does well: brags about all the statistics Corporation does poorly: hides all the statistics and asks customers to trust it that it's doing well

Classic corporate transparency. When a filthy corpo says they're dedicated to something, they're usually dedicated to the opposite.

[–] Bazell@lemmy.zip 9 points 2 weeks ago

Next step: you no longer can like or dislike the video.

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I blame Netflix for starting this shit, and I blame everyone who subscribes to them for allowing it.

[–] Bazell@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I do not know why to use Netflix in the first place if you can simply visit free streaming platforms like HDREZKA, watch a few ads and then enjoy your film. Yeah, ads can be annoying sometimes but, at least, all is free, content doesn't get removed simply because of it is no longer watched actively and no forced registration. And they also provide some useful features like the personal lists, collections, different sound records, history of publication for series and even the approximate schedule for the upcoming series which is really useful.

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

TBH, people often dislike bombed videos some pundit "disproved" it for them.

load more comments
view more: next ›