this post was submitted on 23 Nov 2025
187 points (89.5% liked)

Economics

998 readers
159 users here now

founded 2 years ago
 

The average American now holds onto their smartphone for 29 months, according to a recent survey by Reviews.org, and that cycle is getting longer. The average was around 22 months in 2016.

While squeezing as much life out of your device as possible may save money in the short run, especially amid widespread fears about the strength of the consumer and job market, it might cost the economy in the long run, especially when device hoarding occurs at the level of corporations. 

Research released by the Federal Reserve last month concludes that each additional year companies delay upgrading equipment results in a productivity decline of about one-third of a percent, with investment patterns accounting for approximately 55% of productivity gaps between advanced economies. The good news: businesses in the U.S. are generally quicker to reinvest in replacing aging equipment. The Federal Reserve report shows that if European productivity had matched U.S. investment patterns starting in 2000, the productivity gap between the U.S and European economic heavyweights would have been reduced by 29 percent for the U.K., 35 percent for France, and 101% for Germany.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Acamon@lemmy.world 239 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

The idea, that keeping a device for more than two years is "short term" thinking that could doom the economy, is a pretty damning indictment on the state of your economy.

[–] foodandart@lemmy.zip 65 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

More to the point that news item came from CNBC, itself a company that is 100% advertiser-supported.

Of course they're going to claim that people not buying is the doom of the economy.

Their whole existence is tied to hyperconsumption, which, is becoming evident to even the marginally aware, of being no longer viable in the long run.

Say after me: "Too bad, so sad.."

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 27 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

NBC is owned by Comcast, who also owns Xfinity and invests in T-Mobile. At some point there is going to be just 3 companies running everything and the courts they own will say they aren't monopolies

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MartianSands@sh.itjust.works 129 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Jesus Christ, when did choosing not to throw away a perfectly good device become "device hoarding"?

[–] Zetta@mander.xyz 52 points 3 weeks ago

Gotta love American capitalist propaganda.

[–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 20 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

the framing on it lmao

"corporation device hoarding"

you mean businesses keeping devices that they KNOW work instead of changing to devices with bullshit new issues created so more of your data can be harvested and you can be advertised to more?

[–] ByteJunk@lemmy.world 10 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I've worked at large (5k+ workers) companies that were running Windows XP well into the late 2010's, with matching hardware. That was too extreme (goddamn ie6).

But this article makes me sick. If the economy needs people to throw away perfectly usable goods and buy new ones, the problem isn't the people, it's the fucking economy. It's time to take a step back and rethink the system, because it's gonna implode.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] modestmeme@lemmy.world 109 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Companies act like the general population simply OWES them business. We do not.

On that note, please refuse to participate in Black Friday and keep your Christmas low key and sentimental.

[–] Broadfern@lemmy.world 26 points 3 weeks ago

That’s my plan. Primarily food and handmade/carefully picked gifts rather than lavish this year.

Also wtf? How is 2 years “a long time” to hold onto an expensive machine? Mine have been at least 4-5 years between buys. Products are supposed to last.

[–] witten@lemmy.world 16 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (10 children)

Specifically, Thanksgiving through Cyber Monday, boycott Target, Amazon (including Whole Foods), and Home Depot even harder than usual: https://weaintbuyingit.com/

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 91 points 3 weeks ago

"Americans are producing less e-waste and getting more value out of their purchases, and this is bad for rich people!"

[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 78 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Anyone who writes a headline like this should be chained to a bale of ewaste and thrown into the ocean.

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 16 points 3 weeks ago

Ship them in a container to Ghana to be "recycled" in a bonfire with the rest of the ewaste

[–] 0ops@piefed.zip 76 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Continuing to use something that still works is Hoarding? The shear fucking gall. They're literally having to misuse the word "hoard" because they couldn't think of a word for "sticking with something that works" with negative enough connotations.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 50 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Oh no not the economy 😭😔

[–] TrippingBalls@lemmy.world 13 points 3 weeks ago

It's costing productivity..

Forget the damage to the planet that consumerism causes

Sociedad de consumo y obsolescencia programada

[–] Don_alForno@feddit.org 45 points 3 weeks ago

Not constantly throwing away things that are still good is "device hoarding" now? Strong "quiet quitting" vibes there.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 42 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (8 children)

29 months

squeezing as much life out of your device as possible

Dude, my average phone age is 7 years. I'm now on my 3rd since smartphones exist.

What do US people do with their phones? Even my dad (a farmer) has them longer and he loses them sometimes in the field or drives them over.

[–] GalacticGrapefruit@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Yank here. I dunno what these fucks are complaining about. All my phones have either been cheap, or refurbished secondhand. Hell, I even learned how to fix my own so I could make them last as long as possible. And when the OS gets too slow, I start throwing out old apps like I'm bailing a leaky ship. My average phone's lifetime is nearly five years. My laptop? Nearly ten.

You know what this smells like? Smells like rich people complaining about poor people being pragmatic and sensible. "Decreasing productivity by 1/3 of a percentage point." Spoiled little prince can eat my entire ass.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] naught101@lemmy.world 41 points 3 weeks ago

The economy can go fuck itself. I'd rather have a society and an ecology.

[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 37 points 3 weeks ago
[–] Chivera@lemmy.world 36 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Oh no! Not the economy 😭

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ValiantDust@feddit.org 32 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Me, reading this on my 86 month old phone and feeling like the left's greatest hero for dealing such a mighty blow to capitalism.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] moopet@sh.itjust.works 30 points 3 weeks ago

29 months is "as much as possible"? My phone is from 2016 and it works fine!

[–] TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world 29 points 3 weeks ago

Fuck the economy.

[–] Entertainmeonly@lemmy.blahaj.zone 28 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

Wait why the f are the consumers being blamed for the economy?

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 28 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Who is only getting 29 months out of a smart phone? What are you doing?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] snooggums@piefed.world 26 points 3 weeks ago

device hoarding

Get the fuck out of here.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 22 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

This whole thing reads like satire.

And not like the whole semiconductor industry is one of the most environmentally toxic ones. Better keep your phone/computer as long as possible.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 22 points 3 weeks ago

It might be bad for the economy, but it's better for the environment, for the amount of money available for rent, food, insurance, emergencies...

[–] DioramaOfShit@lemmy.world 20 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

My $1000 piece of electronics lasted 2 years! YAYYYY!!!!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] BanMe@lemmy.world 20 points 3 weeks ago

Who the fuck decided to predicate the economy on a <2-year upgrade cycle for electronics?! Tim Apple is that you?

[–] fodor@lemmy.zip 19 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

No you fucking dolt, it is saving the economy a ton of money to spend on other things.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] bitwolf@sh.itjust.works 18 points 3 weeks ago

If the economy depends in us buying new phones every two years, then maybe the economy wasn't as strong as we thought it was.

[–] N0t_5ure@lemmy.world 18 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

There is no need to upgrade devices every two years ago, which used to be the norm. A decade or more ago, each new generation of phone was a huge leap forward. Today, not so much. Maybe a marginally better camera or a touch more battery life, but nothing earth shattering, and the camera and battery life on my "ancient" Pixel 6 Pro are more than adequate for my needs. I'll probably upgrade in the next year or so, to a used Pixel 9, because the price of them used has plummeted since the release of the Pixel 10, and the Pixel 6 is nearing the end of its support by GrapheneOS.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Triumph@fedia.io 17 points 3 weeks ago

It's costing whose economy? Every purchase that anyone makes costs them more than it should, with that "more" going directly into the pockets of wealthy owners who provide little or no value. When people purchase less, they are primarily hurting those wealthy owners.

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 17 points 3 weeks ago

The issue isn't money, it's the complete and utter lack of innovation on the devices being sold.

Quality is another issue. I was forced to buy a new phone, and ended up with a OnePlus. The software is so broken that I can no longer use my launcher I've used for a decade now. The home button glitches out when I do.

[–] lemmydripzdotz456@lemmy.world 15 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] 0ndead 13 points 3 weeks ago

The fuck it is

[–] Bennyboybumberchums@lemmy.world 12 points 3 weeks ago

Reduce the amount of disposable income across the board, then start moaning that people arent buying shit they dont need as much... The utter fucking state of these people.

[–] etherphon@midwest.social 11 points 3 weeks ago

Zero people really need a new phone every two years, that's crazy. This economy and sadly a lot of jobs are based on some wild idea of endless consumption which is just not sustainable, especially when your customer base is getting poorer by the day.

[–] Starski@lemmy.zip 10 points 3 weeks ago

Ive had my phone for upwards of 4 years now, and I plan on keeping it for at least another 4 unless something tragic happens. Oops sorry I guess I can't afford food this week kids, those billionaires and investors might lose money so I have to go get a new phone

[–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 9 points 3 weeks ago (7 children)

The law of diminishing returns has entered the chat.

My internet service provider, for example, offered 500 MBPS and recently came out with a plan that was $20 per month cheaper and only offered 100 MBPS and I jumped on it as fast as I possibly could because I don't need 500 MBPS ever.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] KaChilde@sh.itjust.works 9 points 3 weeks ago

I was going to make a joke about needing to buy a $1000 iphone every 6 months to save the economy, but then I went to the apple site to make sure I wasn’t being hyperbolic…

Christ on a fucking cracker! the latest iPhone can cost up to $3,800 in my local currency! Just fucking blow my brains out, the world is cooked. Bury me with my 5 year old phone, it’s still got a few years left in it I reckon.

[–] rezad@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago

"cost the economy" when your economy is based on consumerism then not buying as fast destroys the economy.

[–] MimicJar@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago

Many workers report that aging devices stifle productivity, but like a favorite pair of shoes or an old sweater, they don’t want to give them up to learn the intricacies of a new device (which they’ll learn and then have to replace with another). Familiarity can trump productivity for many workers.

So first off I'm glad they mentioned this. However it's frustrating to see the first quote, "last month concludes that each additional year companies delay upgrading equipment results in a productivity decline of about one-third of a percent" which feels like real numbers versus the section I quoted which feel like vibes.

There is a cost in doing something and a cost in not doing something. Sometimes doing nothing is the best course of action.

(Now if getting a new device is a huge cost you should investigate where you can improve that process.)

[–] meathorse@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I brought my s24 exactly because it's got 7yrs of updates. I suspect it'll need a new battery around 4yrs. If I'm lucky, that will let me hold out until Linux phones are more polished

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›