this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2023
39 points (91.5% liked)

Canada

10278 readers
313 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
all 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Nouveau_Burnswick@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (2 children)

We brought in similar rules on Montréal (maybe more of Québec as well, I'm not sure), and have seen limited results.

I recommend cities making similiar legislation include snitch lines and bounties for citizen reporting.

[–] tempest@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It feels like most of these rules tend to lack any sort of enforcement mechanism which means a couple people will get made an example of but by and large the problem will remain.

[–] Sabin10@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

If your elected officials own rental properties and short term rentals (many do) the you can find expect next to zero enforcement on things like this.

[–] inasaba@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

Many boroughs in Montreal have their own rules on short-term rentals, but the provincial regulation is getting tightened up a lot after that fire that killed 6 people in Montreal.

[–] plaguesandbacon@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 years ago

Or just ban Airbnb altogether.

[–] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Is it just me or is the thumbnail from this post a perfect example of classwarfare in action?

Why do only the bigger houses get a lane of trees in front?

[–] steal_your_face@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Looks like the smaller buildings are garages in an alley.

[–] inasaba@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

A lot of them are "laneway houses," a way to subsidize your own home by renting out your alleyway frontage to someone else.

[–] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 years ago

TIL about alleyway frontage, now that i pay attention to it i have seen it plenty of times in media but so rarely in real life.

Those are some massive houses though.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 3 points 2 years ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


British Columbia is bringing in new rules to strictly regulate short-term rentals, including requiring hosts to register with the province, giving municipalities the ability to raise fines for those that don’t and creating a team to enforce the proposed legislation.

Premier David Eby said Monday that “short-term rentals have gotten out of control” in B.C., estimating the proposed legislation could see 8,000 homes returned to the regular housing market out of the 28,000 that are currently listed.

For those who are operating multiple units, the rules are changing May 1 when this legislation passes and you should bring yourself up to speed,” Mr. Eby said, suggesting they either sell or rent their properties long-term to permanent residents.

Mr. Eby acknowledged he has used Airbnb himself and insisted throughout that it is a benefit when people are genuinely sharing their homes as vacation rentals, which is why the province didn’t impose a complete ban.

“We’ve been asking for this for a while because it’s been hard for us even to have any bylaws that are effective,” said UBCM president Trish Mandewo, a councillor in the Vancouver suburb of Coquitlam, which has seen a 40-per-cent increase in short-term rentals in a single year.

Airbnb emphasized that a recent report from the Conference Board of Canada concluded that short-term rentals are not responsible for the significant rent increases in 19 of the country’s largest cities.


The original article contains 845 words, the summary contains 232 words. Saved 73%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!