It's not going to be a total reboot either! Same universe as produced that had Jack O'Neil played by Richard Dean Anderson. I hope they guest star Amanda Tapping at least once.
Or, what if the whole thing is about the Ancients before they ascended?
Chevron 7
A community for sharing humor about Stargate in all its iterations.
Rules:
For more general Stargate content, visit !stargate@lemmy.world
It's not going to be a total reboot either! Same universe as produced that had Jack O'Neil played by Richard Dean Anderson. I hope they guest star Amanda Tapping at least once.
Or, what if the whole thing is about the Ancients before they ascended?
Ugh I don't need some angsty ancients romcom.
I need C4, godslayers in green jumpsuits, and major intergalactic diplomatic incidents god dam it.
Keep the gates closed but acquire the same goods via the port.
I stopped watching The Expanse when it went to Amazon. Was that a mistake?
Rings of Power was hilariously bad though. Money truly cannot buy anything.
its going to be like ROP, sloppy series, poorly written or sourced material? or trying to copy kurtzmans disastrous run on TREK series.
I'm excited. I'm expecting Universe quality writing. i hope to be pleasantly surprised, but i don't expect it.
still gonna watch it tho. i just bought the damn dvd collection last winter i don't want to buy any more stargate shit for a while
This can vary a lot from Stargate fan to Stargate fan, is Universe quality writing a good thing or a bad thing?
From seeing the people in charge and how they handled the announcement, I'm kind of expecting something in line with SG-1/Atlantis, but looking forward to hearing more about the direction.
Universe was half stargate half cw teen drama.
is Universe quality writing a good thing or a bad thing?
It's a bad thing.
Stargate, much of the time, was competency porn. Writers threw that away and did a man-vs-man-survival style story in an enclosed space aboard a runaway starship. The story heavily borrowed cues from LOST and Battlestar Galactica (reboot) instead, relying heavily on characters spontaneously acting blind/deaf/dumb for no reason, seemingly as a plot-device to keep the drama going. The way to survival and broader frontiers was clearly to just work together, but that was just constantly and frustratingly out of reach. When the audience is used to the opposite of all that, it makes for a very miserable watch.
It's a mixed bag, for me.
Charitably, I could say that they were a little ahead of their time. Something I've noticed about nearly all of the best TV/Movies/etc. these days is that they're all heavily character-focused. It's the well-written characters that are the soul of good stories, and the situations and settings are just a vehicles for character exploration and interaction. So, Universe, from my perspective, was an attempt to make a character-focused show.
But the characters they WROTE in Universe... well, there were a few really good ones, a few reeeeeeeeeeally not so good ones, and a lot of rather boring mediocre ones.
That being said, it's still Stargate. I stillnreally liked the show and wasnpissed it got cancelled. I refuse to believe it was because the show got really bad numbers, on its own merit. But there is quite a lot to criticize about it.
Same here. Hopes are high, expectations are low.
None of the stuff I'm reading comments on the large following sg1 had due to it's realistic depiction of military life (sans the obvious science fiction aspects). I know a fair amount of veterans who found watching it validating to the both positive and negative aspects of their lived experience (I interact a decent amount with veterans after the us military industrial complex is done chewing them up and spitting them out for the promise of alleviating their poverty).
„Fan“ expectations will absolutely wreck it.