I will on rare occasions accept all if the site gives me the option to reject all but necessary.
memes
Community rules
1. Be civil
No trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour
2. No politics
This is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world
3. No recent reposts
Check for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month
4. No bots
No bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins
5. No Spam/Ads/AI Slop
No advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.
A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment
Sister communities
- !tenforward@lemmy.world : Star Trek memes, chat and shitposts
- !lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world : Lemmy Shitposts, anything and everything goes.
- !linuxmemes@lemmy.world : Linux themed memes
- !comicstrips@lemmy.world : for those who love comic stories.
Accept all with Cookie Auto delete, best of both annoying worlds
Also use I still don't care about cookies for auto do whatever you want in combination with cookie auto-delete
I didn't know that was a thing, genius!
These forms are actually about consent of tracking and cookies are just one of the ways to do tracking. You're still consenting to tracking.
Also Firefox Total Cookie Protection is a better solution for cookies. You should enable strict mode and Cookie AutoDelete does not work with Firefox strict mode.
Why oh why didn't the lawmakers add an obligation to use a standardized cookies selection popup.
I remember day one of it coming into effect and it was already obvious this was a necessity.
Lobbying. One of those laws pretending to do the right thing but sabotaged.
Or maybe its even worse than that.
Before you could just have the cookies deleted. But if you do that now you get the awful popup every time, so you just accept them in the end.
I know I do.
This law has made me accept cookies spying.
That's already part of the GDPR, companies just aren't complying with it.
From the official GDPR site:
To comply with the regulations governing cookies under the GDPR and the ePrivacy Directive you must:
- Receive users’ consent before you use any cookies except strictly necessary cookies.
- Provide accurate and specific information about the data each cookie tracks and its purpose in plain language before consent is received.
- Document and store consent received from users.
- Allow users to access your service even if they refuse to allow the use of certain cookies
- Make it as easy for users to withdraw their consent as it was for them to give their consent in the first place.
Because those laws were made with good intentions in mind.
But businesses never have good intentions, especially if it eats into their revenue. So they use malicious compliance to make it seem like it is the law that is bad.
Reject all
~ tada! ~
Yeah, it's also super easy to prove P!=NP. Just do this one step:
prove it
~ tada! ~
Idk why anyone is still struggling with it.
YMMV. Some of the pop ups like to make the "Reject" button difficult to find.
- Just leave that website and find somewhere else to do business.
The correct way to deal with cookies : eat them!
I may have diabetes...
So, probably stupid question.
If a website pops up and asks for permission, and I bypass that pop-up in some way (like killing the pop up with an addon or some you can just ignore it and keep scrolling with it on the bottom of the screen)
Until ive clicked agree, do websites just not start tracking or creating or doing anything with cookies? After all, they've acknowledged they need, dont have permission.
Or is this by and large pointless, and unless ive jumped through their hoops, they've already started the page with cookies enabled?
depends on the site.
legally you’re assuming the correct way it’s supposed to work in a lot of jurisdictions but in practice who actually litigates these sorts of things?
people get away with it all the time.
there’s also tons of sites hosted in places where it’s totally legal to just have cookies with any user from anywhere with or without consent, those might have a permission banner just as a UX thing to make the site feel more “familiar” or “official”. learning how whole contemporary stack works, at least broadly speaking, is one of the only remaining ways to actually be proactive. knowledge is power.
Besides opening up and viewing a lot of these sites on private tabs, I'm just getting used to cleaning all cookies after I finished checking up what I wanted.
10
In the EU: bottom is same as the top one (but I still have ghostery etc).
I generally just accept because its faster and i have additional filters in place, cookies will be deleted on browser close, and usually a vpn running so i really dont give a shit if the site wants to build a profile out of false data.
Should have been handled on protocol level. Cookies get priority levels, set browser to only accept required cookies and done. Everyone just wanted to do it the easy way... add a banner and ask the user.. or dont even make the banner, call a third party library that does it for you.. and has its own tracking code.. yay!
Or just use PopUpOff.
I don't consent to jack shit that tries to hold my time hostage lol
I don't understand why US sites display this when their audience is US only.
Which US sites have US visitors only? Apart from government.
California also requires this, as well as Canada
Probably from a common template.
Just install Cookie Autodelete
These forms are actually about consent of tracking and cookies are just one of the ways to do tracking. You're still consenting to tracking.
Also Firefox Total Cookie Protection is a better solution for cookies. You should enable strict mode and Cookie AutoDelete does not work with Firefox strict mode.
Just use Ghostery, mate. Does it all for you.
Been using Hush, works pretty well
The easier way is to do it in your browser.