The moment when you thought that you have entered the wrong church but then you understood that this wasn't a mistake.
this post was submitted on 16 Nov 2025
59 points (96.8% liked)
Church of Thighentology
1277 readers
65 users here now
For lovers of all things anime thighs. Thick, thin, or in between; all are welcome here.
- Posts must feature legs or thighs. The thickness or focus doesn't matter as long as they are present
- Lewd/Ecchi is fine, but please mark NSFW as needed
- Include source in body if possible.
- No AI generated content.
Find other anime communities which may interest you: Here---
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 13 comments
sorted by:
hot
top
controversial
new
old
[deleted]
it's not a lot of work to look up the artist yourself and see that they have a portfolio going back as far as a decade full of drawings of comparable quality.
[deleted]
Ok.
But apparently what you do look for, are opportunities to comment unfounded suspiciouns, which you could have disproven by opening any single one of the links in the very same post.
That's not investigative journalism. That's the bare minimum.
Otherwise you risk spreading your suspiciouns to everyone just as lazy as you. And you are lazy.
Writing that comment required more effort than checking the date of the work using one of the provided links. And that's before considering that verifying a thought before voicing is basic common sense. Instead you left a comment that is a literal request for others to do this for you.
[deleted]
We should normalize asking if something uses AI
In a community that forbids it?
we should normalize tagging art as AI-free.
In... In a communtiy that forbids AI?
Asking is fine.
But you didn't bring up anything unclear. You asked if water was wet, while standing in some.
By all means if something raises an eyebrow and the sources don't back it up, look into it. But you didn't do that.
All you did was essentially go "this is sus" on something that 100% wasn't, and then drop the mic.
And when told you could have just answered the question yourself, you instantly cry "too much effort".
[deleted]
I didn't have a problem with you asking.
I have problem with your "others can put in the effort" attitude.
My initial reply is essentially little more than a reply to your question.
Only once you straight up went "I'm not some investigative journalist" when all you had to do was open a fucking link, did I take issue.
[deleted]
When you realize that you're pushing someone's buttons, going straight to looking for more, is not a cool thing to do.
It's childish and pathetic when it doesn't work. Cruel and rude, when it does.
It doesn't make some kind of point. Being a dick isn't fine. No-one should need a thick skin to deal with you.
If people do, that doesn't make you any kind of cool. Just plain unpleasant.
Thank you for the responses here @MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz! While I agree that it sucks that we all have to be extra skeptical about ai now and asking about it is fine, all of my communities explicitly ban ai posts. I would hate for a legitimate artist to not be shared because of a false ai accusation. I also know most posters here are careful to sort through things prior to posting. That being said, I appreciate the skepticism, and please report if you think a post features AI art, but if/when shown otherwise it's a good way to learn how to get better at spotting ai usage.