this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2025
1563 points (98.9% liked)

Work Reform

14477 readers
124 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] vga@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 month ago (7 children)

Either not taxed enough or there's almost no competition in the thing they do. And in a healthy free market, there should definitely be competition in a field that nets that much profits. The logical conclusion is that something is actively preventing the competition.

that nets that much profits

that's kinda the issue, building rockets isn't all that profitable. they do it anyways because they believe in the vision and that it will pay off long-term, just not short-term

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 month ago

You think the free market can save us from billionares. Wow. How long have you been drinking that kool aid man.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

$999,999,999 is just fine though!

Stop focusing on an arbitrary figure and start focusing on a real progressive income tax with no loopholes or workarounds.

[–] Emerald@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

$999,999,999 is just fine though!

Better than $450 billion, gotta start somewhere

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] GrammarPolice@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

It's not a policy failure; it's a feature of the system. We need a different system that doesn't allow the existence of billionaires to begin with

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago

I agree, but they're not giving enough credit to human greed and megalomania. It should be at least 50/50.

[–] FreddiesLantern@leminal.space 1 points 1 month ago

Time to bring out the soluti-honhonhon.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›