this post was submitted on 10 Nov 2025
115 points (96.0% liked)

News

33080 readers
2790 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The deal, negotiated by a group of Democrats and GOP leaders, funds the government through Jan. 30. If it passes, it will still need to clear the House, which will likely take days.

WASHINGTON — Senators struck an agreement Sunday, projecting confidence that it will be sufficient to end the lengthy U.S. government shutdown, three sources with direct knowledge of the details told NBC News.

The agreement, reached by a group of Democrats who teamed up with Republicans, should have the necessary 60 votes to clear the Senate, these sources said. It would then need to pass the House and earn President Donald Trump's signature to become law and reopen the government.

Even if it has enough support to clear those hurdles, the process is expected to take days.

The agreement contains a “minibus” — three full-year appropriations bills that will fund certain departments like Agriculture through the end of the fiscal year next fall — and a continuing resolution to fund the rest of the government at existing spending levels through Jan. 30.

It would also fully fund the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, once known as food stamps, through next September, a major flashpoint in the shutdown.

The sources said the deal also reverses Trump’s attempted layoffs of federal workers during the shutdown through RIFs, or “reduction in force” notifications.

But in a major concession from Democrats, it does not include an extension of expiring Affordable Care Act subsidies. Allowing the funds to lapse would raise insurance premiums for millions of Americans unless they are extended. Instead, the Democrats settled for a promise that the Senate will vote on a bill to extend the subsidies by the end of the second week of December, with the outcome uncertain, two of the sources said.

Even then, House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., has said he won’t promise that the House will vote on extending the subsidies.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

the Democrats settled for a promise

Typical Neoliberals: always willing to sell out the country in exchange for the assurances of liars that they're going to do the opposite of what they always do 🤬🤦

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 5 points 2 hours ago

Instead, the Democrats settled for a promise that the Senate will vote on a bill to extend the subsidies by the end of the second week of December, with the outcome uncertain

I wonder what will be "uncertain" about the Republicans killing ACA?

[–] theoneandonlyeggboi@lemmings.world 6 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Does anyone else think it's bullshit how Congress gets paid while the shutdown is going on?

[–] Jerkface@lemmy.world 5 points 1 hour ago

I think it's bullshit that we don't elect an entire new Congress when this one can't govern.

[–] zd9@lemmy.world 19 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

Democrats as so spineless. If they had even 50% of the fighting spirit that Republicans had (though they fight for things like taking away rights from minorities and taking money from the poor to give to their wealthy buddies), then we'd have universal healthcare, CONUS high-speed rail, complete renewable energy power, etc.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 2 points 2 hours ago

OLD Guard dnc is only electable because of republicans mismanagement of the previous admin, they dont really have any campaign promises of thier own, other than "promises", they are codependent on gop to fuck, up so they get elected. thats why they dont often repeal what the gop legislate, because also benefits them, and they usually have the same donors.

[–] theoneandonlyeggboi@lemmings.world 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

There are still a lot of useful idiots in the democratic party as well as its constituency.

They, for some bizarre reason, feel like the success of businesses somehow translates to success for them. This means they are afraid to raise taxes on the people taking us for a ride.

A lot of them would rather have a child-raping fascist in office if he won't raise taxes on our rulers.

[–] WanderWisley@lemmy.world 70 points 7 hours ago (2 children)
[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 32 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

And they're all retiring. Don't bother remembering their names, and instead elect good candidates. Pay attention to your local elections and don't just vote for someone because they have a D next to their name

[–] grimpy@lemmy.myserv.one 9 points 5 hours ago

Vote in the damn primaries!

[–] coreray00@discuss.online 6 points 5 hours ago

Honestly, I thought Obama was going to be a change candidate instead of an inspiring war criminal

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 5 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

not surprised thier all DINOS, and schumer probably negotiated with them behind the scenes. cant expect anything less from AIPAC SHILL FETTERMAN. and these were the likely DINOS hiding behind manchin and sinema for the last 4 year of bidens term, used those 2 as a lightning rod so they dont get primaried.

[–] CubitOom 105 points 8 hours ago (6 children)

But in a major concession from Democrats, it does not include an extension of expiring Affordable Care Act subsidies. Allowing the funds to lapse would raise insurance premiums for millions of Americans unless they are extended. Instead, the Democrats settled for a promise that the Senate will vote on a bill to extend the subsidies by the end of the second week of December, with the outcome uncertain, two of the sources said.

This is why we can't have nice things.

This is what "socially liberal, fiscally conservative" gets us.

spits

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 11 points 5 hours ago

Instead, the Democrats settled for a promise that the Senate will vote on a bill to extend the subsidies by the end of the second week of December, with the outcome uncertain...

... Uncertain is a word used when you aren't sure what the outcome will be.

Uncertain is certainly NOT the word to use in this situation.

Republicans in December: HAHAHAHAHAHA fuck you Dems, we vote no. Next.

[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 68 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

"With the outcome uncertain"

Everyone saying this needs to be fired from whatever position they hold. The outcome is 100% certain. Democrats just voted to gut healthcare.

[–] collar@lemmy.world 45 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

If this was the end result, why did we even have a shutdown? Weren’t these subsidies the main sticking point?

Classic Schumer… hold out for nothing.

[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 33 points 7 hours ago

Not for nothing. Republicans are gonna gain a lot of support because of this. So it was actually for less than nothing

[–] Witchfire@lemmy.world 25 points 7 hours ago

And the ratchet clicks

[–] skeezix@lemmy.world 12 points 7 hours ago

YOU PROMISED

[–] aarch0x40@lemmy.world 159 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (3 children)

I think what the headline means to say is "In exchange for nothing, Democrats sell out their constituents"

[–] ccunning@lemmy.world 17 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I’m disappointed too, but there’s a reasonable chance the huge expected jump in healthcare costs will bite the GOP in the ass…

Just look at MTG

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 52 points 7 hours ago (3 children)

Yeah the thousands of people who are going to die, be bankrupted, and or go homeless in the meantime probably don't give a fuck about how it might change the elections in a year.

[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 17 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

And lets be honest, it's not going to change the elections either since nobody is willing to use their vote for anything but more garbage from both of these parties.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] skeezix@lemmy.world 17 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

Democrats lubed up their arseholes and bent over for the repubs. How do the do-nothing democrats make you feel now?

Sick to my fucking stomach

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SkybreakerEngineer@lemmy.world 7 points 7 hours ago

"In exchange for agreeing to stop doing all the illegal stuff"

So, kinda?

[–] salacious_coaster 80 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

If the GOP isn't going to fund the subsidies now, they're not going to do it in a couple of months. A teenager could see through a lie like that. I knew the Dems were cowards, but before this year I really didn't know just how leaderless we've been.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 5 points 4 hours ago

cant expect anything less from old guard DEMs to not side with gop.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org 53 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Did they cave? Of course they did. Vote them out if they caved.

[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 36 points 7 hours ago

Everyone who caved was already either retiring or otherwise not up for reelection. Do you think it's a coincidence that they got exactly as many yes votes as they needed? The entire democrat party needs replaced.

[–] apftwb@lemmy.world 18 points 6 hours ago

The agreement contains a “minibus” — three full-year appropriations bills that will fund certain departments like Agriculture through the end of the fiscal year next fall — and a continuing resolution to fund the rest of the government at existing spending levels through Jan. 30.

Cool. So those departments are going away next year.

[–] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 31 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

All the dems responsible are either retiring or not up for reelection at the midterms, theres a reason Schumer moved behind the scenes and tapped who he tapped. They should all be held accountable. Staged reistance from Chuckle fuck

[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 47 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

BREAKING: Democrats officially take credit for longest shutdown in US history

I'm so livid. The Democrats just threw away the most politically advantageous position they've had in the last 197 years. They could have just done nothing until the next election cycle and guarantee a monumental blue wave, a blue fucking tsunami, as people would vote en masse to replace Republicans with Democrats because this shutdown was obviously 100% on the Republicans. Instead they decided to turn that politically advantageous position against themselves. They saw the Republicans tying themselves a noose, and leapt right into it.

[–] MelonYellow@lemmy.ca 20 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (2 children)

Well we knew this would end once the flights were getting cancelled. It’s all for show. 🙄

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 1 points 2 hours ago

the dnc knew thier were no chance of the aca being reinistated, so they did half measure virtue signalling.

[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 24 points 6 hours ago

Senate democrats casually sacrificing 44 million lives so that their thanksgiving plans won't be interrupted

[–] Manjushri@piefed.social 23 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Anyone know who the Democrats are in the "group of Democrats who teamed up with Republicans" to get to 60 votes is? I want to know the names of the ones who turned coat and caved.

[–] JakenVeina@midwest.social 1 points 2 hours ago

Don't be fooled that they're the ones responsible, and just went against the Democrat leadership. There's a REASON that all of them are retiring, and can't be voted out. Schumer and his cohort WANTED this, knew people would be pissed, and arranged the votes to minimize the fallout.

[–] raynethackery@lemmy.world 16 points 7 hours ago

We need to make it clear to the Democratic Party that we won't just primary the Senators that do this. We will primary every Democrat up for election in 2026. They need to have their futures tied to the defectors. Republicans seem to be able to keep their delegation in line. Time to start playing hardball.

[–] brownsugga@lemmy.world 15 points 7 hours ago

Cowards. Feckless, spineless white-livered scumsucking bottom feeders.

load more comments
view more: next ›