this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2025
131 points (97.8% liked)

News

33080 readers
2863 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

Where exactly does that money come from? We end up paying more for it in the end due to inflation and it all trickles up as we spend it.

We need to raise taxes on the ruling class. There is no other way.

[–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 20 points 10 hours ago

i believe it when i see it. he's announced the same thing back in may and nothing happened.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 69 points 14 hours ago (3 children)

I'll add that to my $5,000 DOGE dividend. Why do news outlets report what he says when he's obviously lying?

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 15 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I’ll bet money that he’s going to actually try to do this.

Remember when Congress voted to send Americans assistance checks during the pandemic — and Trump plastered his name all over those checks for shameless political points?

This guy 100% wants to send out “Trump” checks again.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 2 points 9 hours ago

"When Congress voted" is doing a lot of heavy lifting there.

[–] x00z@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Because in theory that's just what news outlets should be doing. He says something and they should bring that to the people. Whether or not it is a lie or the public considers it a lie is not news YET. We're better of receiving this information even if we know it to be a lie because we should be up to date of whatever the turd is saying.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 1 points 9 hours ago

No, it really isn't. That's a press release. Or the Truth post Trump made.

News filters for worthy events, explains mechanics, and adds other context to help its readers understand why this thing is worth knowing and what it might mean.

[–] P1k1e@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago
[–] WanderWisley@lemmy.world 27 points 12 hours ago

Not happening

[–] logicbomb@lemmy.world 48 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

$2000 a person won't even offset the additional cost from the ACA subsidy reduction. So, a one-time check that would only cover several months of the recurring cost that he's given us.

[–] henfredemars 23 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

When you’re that rich, $2000 and $0 are basically the same. It’s a pittance for what they see as an underclass of poors.

[–] Drusas@fedia.io 11 points 12 hours ago

I think a lot of people don't get this.

Imagine there's something that you want--maybe a lot, maybe only a little. What that something is doesn't matter.

What amount of money would you consider to be a negligible amount for you to spend to get that thing you want? Maybe it's a few dollars or maybe it's as little as 10 cents. For me, now that I am reasonably comfortable, anything that only costs about a dollar, I consider to basically be free.

This is how the wealthy view anything that is "only" in the thousands of dollars.

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 11 points 14 hours ago

It also won't make up for the small businesses that went under because their margins disappeared.

[–] Joeffect@lemmy.world 96 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (4 children)

What's high income 30k a year or more? Such a joke...

The $2,000 dividend could come in lots of forms, in lots of ways, George," Bessent told anchor George Stephanopoulos. "You know, it could be just the tax decreases that we are seeing on the president's agenda -- you know, no tax on tips, no tax on overtime, no tax on Social Security, deductibility of auto loans."

Oh so no money for you

[–] Gerudo@lemmy.zip 23 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

So what this means is there will be no $2000 check. It will just be "hidden" relief that is almost impossible to actually see and verify. Cool cool cool

[–] Joeffect@lemmy.world 9 points 12 hours ago

That's what I get out of it... something they can say they did... but its actually nothing...

[–] wizzor@sopuli.xyz 17 points 15 hours ago

These are all measures which reinforce some negative aspects of US economy, apart from social security taxes.

[–] socsa@piefed.social 12 points 14 hours ago

Great, so the four people who can itemize tips will benefit.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 35 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

How about you use that money to pay SNAP instead?

[–] ninj4geek@lemmy.wtf 9 points 12 hours ago

Because he can say this and it won't happen.

[–] DickFiasco@sh.itjust.works 22 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

Just ballparking that there are 250 million non-high-earners, at $2k a pop that's $500 billion. Two thousand dollars won't change anyone's life, but $500bn is a big chunk of the federal budget.

[–] shiroininja@lemmy.world 23 points 13 hours ago (1 children)
[–] DickFiasco@sh.itjust.works 22 points 13 hours ago

Sorry, I didn't mean to trivialize that amount of money.

[–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

$2k is a whole lot of money, especially if you consider that most people will immediately spend it, so other people will earn it. a dollar goes much further than only one dollar if it moves through many hands.

also, what do you think is the total cost that tariffs have cost you since january?

[–] ExtremeDullard@piefed.social 59 points 16 hours ago (5 children)

Trump steals people's money, then gives some back to them, and that's supposed to pacify them?
How about not stealing people's money to begin with?

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 2 points 5 hours ago

why not steal it from other rich people and give to the actual people.

[–] Ghyste@sh.itjust.works 32 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

and that's supposed to pacify them?

Every single MAGAt will instantly forget any complaints the second they have a check in hand.

[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 21 points 16 hours ago (5 children)

It doesn't actually sound like anyone will get a check "lots of ways" probably means it's never going to happen, but all the MAGAs will point to him just saying this and gushing about how generous he is

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] ZephyrXero@lemmy.world 4 points 12 hours ago

Hello, let me introduce you to capitalism

[–] the_q@lemmy.zip 10 points 15 hours ago

Because he only has to be smarter than the dumbest people.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Tempus_Fugit@midwest.social 41 points 16 hours ago (4 children)

Lol, bet he's only saying this so when the Supreme Court comes down on his illegal tariffs he can say he was going to give us that money.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 2 points 5 hours ago

remember his 1500% reduction in medications, we never heard of it again after he mentioned it.

[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 25 points 16 hours ago

Technically, If the Supreme Court rules that his tariffs were illegal to begin with, he will be expected to reimburse everyone affected. That may be all this is. He's just trying to spin it as spontaneous generosity, rather than a court ordered obligation.

[–] Blackfeathr@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago

He won't remember any of this by tomorrow, much less when or if SCrOTUS does anything.

[–] henfredemars 7 points 14 hours ago

I was just about to, but you interrupted me!

[–] myfunnyaccountname@lemmy.zip 15 points 13 hours ago

So this is where snap money has gone too

[–] FartMaster69@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Is this dividend in the room with us right now?

[–] MajorasTerribleFate@lemmy.zip 16 points 14 hours ago

He has concepts of a dividend.

[–] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 18 points 15 hours ago

The ultra wealthy already got their 'tariff dividend', in the form of not tax breaks and a discrete heads-up of when to play the market to real maybe amounts of extra wealth.

As for the rest, this offer is just more bullshit. If it does surface (which is very unlikely) there will be some strings attached. And it will in no way fully compensate most people for the turmoil caused by these tariffs.

[–] splount@lemmy.world 23 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

In two weeks. Very special. Don't want to say much now but it's gonna be really special.

[–] Donjuanme@lemmy.world 16 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

The Trump 2 week chicken taco timeline.

He started with "solving crime in Chicago in 1 day"

Then they had a Medicare plan just a week away, but he learned that that was too close for the right wing spin machine.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip 20 points 16 hours ago

He says a lot of things. Meanwhile he's gone out of his way repeatedly to try to starve millions of people.

[–] Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone 10 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

I’ll take it the way I took his stupid ass signed pandemic check. It’s not gonna make me hate the fucker any less, and I’m not stupid enough to think the amount of money the average person has lost on these fucking tariffs is less than $2000. So yeah, pay me to keep the same opinion of you and your policies, shithead.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›