this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2025
1107 points (98.9% liked)

Programmer Humor

27264 readers
776 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 75 points 2 days ago (2 children)

In my last job we called that "optimizing", after a colleague (who usually only did frontent work) used the opportunity when everyone else was on vacation to implement a few show-stopping bugs in the backend and put "optimized backend code" in the commit message. He did the same thing a few months later during the next vacation period, which really solidified the joke.

[–] mattreb@feddit.it 19 points 1 day ago

that's exactly why we have mandatory code reviews now...

[–] bier@feddit.nl 45 points 1 day ago

Worked with a guy that would always say I'm refactoring X and it would usually give us weird issues and bugs. So after a while the team started calling it refucktoring

[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 307 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

"good morning, I'm about to destroy the backend" is exactly the energy I'd welcome from a colleague frankly.

I think the outage that followed as we fumbled to replace it would probably be cheaper than the ongoing maintenance after a few months

[–] jubilationtcornpone@sh.itjust.works 145 points 2 days ago (5 children)

I've seen plenty of back ends that needed to be destroyed.

[–] Ghyste@sh.itjust.works 85 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] inbeesee@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

Because that's how you get phrasing

[–] Sc00ter@lemmy.zip 91 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Are we still talking about code?

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 66 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Wait, you guys were talking about code?

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Etlaris@lemdro.id 2 points 1 day ago

Alternative version: ... -- What are your demands?

  • Deploy -- I demand you have a day off.
[–] apotheotic@beehaw.org 32 points 2 days ago (20 children)

WhatsApp for business communications? Jesus

[–] moseschrute@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Whatapp is for business, and signal is for official government communication

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Both are quite secure but neither of them stop an idiot on one end or the other from sharing the contents with the public.

[–] krooklochurm@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 day ago

I always find it funny how many people fail to understand the "end to end" part of end to end encryption.

If your endpoint isn't secure then the messages aren't.

[–] hypnicjerk@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

whatsapp is closed source and meta owned. i think it's incredibly foolish to trust that it has no backdoors built in.

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's not how encryption works. But you're not wrong about it being owned by meta being a problem. There's more info in a message than just the contents.

[–] MadhuGururajan@programming.dev 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

you say that but they're already thinking a step ahead and assuming meta left a backdoor or CVE at the behest of 3-letter agencies.

What's facebook's business plan? Right, surveillance capitalism.

[–] ptu@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

IIRC whatsapp’s automatic backups are stored in cloud and unencrypted by default. So it takes only one person in the group chat who has backups enabled (pop up reminds periodically if not) and no password is set (not required, takes effort and will to set) to leak everyone’s messages.

[–] airgapped@piefed.social 2 points 1 day ago

I assume no encryption is safe from three letter gangs, at this point I'm only concerned with keeping grubby corporate fingers at bay.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] marcos@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago

Works better than Teams.

Probably has better privacy and confidentiality options too.

load more comments (18 replies)
[–] sirico@feddit.uk 39 points 2 days ago (2 children)

"Today"is a Friday before public holidays

[–] killeronthecorner@lemmy.world 24 points 2 days ago (2 children)

December 23rd

Never trust a man deploying with a Santa hat on

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] bleistift2@sopuli.xyz 132 points 2 days ago (7 children)

What is this magical job where two typos land you a day off, no questions asked?

[–] Tm12@lemmy.ca 78 points 2 days ago
[–] tooclose104@lemmy.ca 58 points 2 days ago (1 children)

A typo in software development or other shell based work could completely ass womp a system in ways that could lose a company lots of money.

Oopsies on prod systems, even with an outage window, can really fuck shit up. Seemingly small mistakes can quickly snowball into systemwide outages.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 62 points 2 days ago (3 children)

It's wild to me how some places I've worked are like locked down, all the infrastructure is in terraform or whatever and can be deployed immediately... and other places are like "ssh into prod with the credentials from confluence, edit the config in vim, and paste the new code into a new file"

[–] fibojoly@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

We literally have both and our new Tech Lead is absolutely terrified that I can deploy shit into prod right from my command line. I think it's hilarious (because yeah, it's total shit, but our Dear Leader was a complete muppet who refused to listen and prioritise doing things right, so here we still are). Also our GitLab is the free licence because why pay for the thing that takes care of our entire codebase, eh ? 👌

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 67 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Do it and I destroy your backend.

Have you dropping tables like you're Mankind in 1999.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] MadMadBunny@lemmy.ca 52 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (4 children)

Narrator: The deployment proved that it wasn’t a typo after all.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›