Their goal is to remove the constitution - so... yay mobsters? yay rule of crime? be quiet or be gone.??
The Baffled States of Biffville want to know.
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
Their goal is to remove the constitution - so... yay mobsters? yay rule of crime? be quiet or be gone.??
The Baffled States of Biffville want to know.
Speaking in the White House Thursday, Vance called the ruling “absurd,” because “you have a federal judge effectively telling us what we have to do in the midst of the Democrat government shutdown.
It's called the rule of law you couch fucking dipshit. Just bc you got permaliner and ozempic then started cheating on your wife with the widow of a guy you probably helped assassinate, doesn't mean everybody has to treat you like a precious little snowflake ❄️
We all know you made it from West Virginia to Yale. We all know that you know what checks and balances are. Just come out and admit you're betraying the U.S. as part of the dumbest coup ever attempted.
the democrat shutdown
Lmfao theyre pushing this so hard, is that the angle here? Do they really think people are going to buy into that?
I mean of course some will, but you didnt need to lie to those people in the first place. Just tell them trump wants to rape their kids and theyll buy their kids lolita express tickets to mara lago

Literally nobody takes this little pissboy seriously

Look the couch, the wheat, the vase with the hole in the center I get.
but the sombrero?
Its from Kimmel in response to Trump posting similarly fabricated images of Hakeem Jefferies wearing a sombrero in a childishly racist post
And in case anyone is unfamiliar with Hakeem Jefferies: He's Black, not Mexican. The sombrero didn't make sense in the original post either.
My man, race is a social construct. Skin pigment doesn't care if you're from Mexico or from China, it's literally the same color.
Do you have an uncensored version?
I'm not asking for a friend, I'm asking for myself.
No, Vance, the shutdown doesn't mean you get to ignore the judiciary.
More seditious "unitary executive theory" bullshit.
So separation of powers is no longer important? F you Vance
In other words, they had a program to literally feed the poorest people, and they decided to leave it without funding despite clearly being able to maintain it, now a judge directly orders them to fund it again, and yet they protest and try to avoid it, or they do avoid it, or something.
Despite all of the above, his voting intentions haven't dropped to zero. The world is sometimes perplexing.
Its funny how often their reasoning is that they are special snowflakes in special snowflake situations.
As soon as it looked like we were headed into another shutdown, my guess was that their play would be to argue, "alright, it's shutdown, I guess we don't have a government anymore. I have no choice then, but to make a new one."
Which you'd think would be a widely unpopular move, until he comes in with "and we'll just use the original US constitution, no extra stuff like 'amendments', just good ol' 1776 like the founding fathers intended".
I think his base would actually get behind it.
When Trump is gone, we'll have a huge problem with JD "Just Dance" Vance. He's even more committed to the cause (aka Yarvin, Thiel/Karp, Andreeson, Dark Enlightenment, Network State, etc.) and is more competent to carry out those actions.
I don’t think he’s more competent at getting people to file or listen to him.
Yeah that's the one thing Trump has that Vance doesn't. He has some kind of magic charisma that draws people to him, which to this day I don't understand. But I think with the full Newsmax/OANN/Fox/Tiktok/TPUSA propaganda machine behind Vance I'm sure they could convince MAGA to go along with him.
When Trump is gone, we'll have a huge problem with JD "Just Dance" Vance. He's even more committed to the cause (aka Yarvin, Thiel/Karp, Andreeson, Dark Enlightenment, Network State, etc.) and is more competent to carry out those actions.
Yeah, this isn't just about not wanting to fund SNAP, this is about Vance trying to normalize unitary executive theory/directly attack separation of powers.