this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2025
328 points (99.4% liked)

News

33088 readers
2763 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca 48 points 3 days ago (7 children)

Ah America. Where a six year old can access firearms but not a lunch program.

[–] Brutticus@midwest.social 16 points 3 days ago

Are you gonna tell a kid with a gun you aren't going to give him lunch?

[–] Hugin@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

That's our school lunch program. Here is a gun, go kill something and eat it.

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Gun companies need to be able to sell their products to anyone without any liability for arming crazy people.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] beejboytyson@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Man, that's fucked up

[–] MourningDove@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 days ago

What idiot downvotes this?

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 days ago

And all gun violence is OK as long as there is a payout to someone.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] tornavish@lemmy.cafe 83 points 3 days ago (4 children)

The student's mother was sentenced to nearly four years in prison for child neglect and federal weapons charges.

You are responsible for your child. Until they are 18, they are an extension of you. You programmed them. No excuses.

[–] ryven@lemmy.dbzer0.com 32 points 3 days ago (10 children)

This doesn't jive with my life experience at all. If my family could have "programmed" me, I would have turned out very differently. Also all my siblings are wildly different people.

The development of living beings is a messy process and there are significant uncontrollable elements.

[–] SoloCritical@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Is leaving your gun lying around where a 6 year old can acquire and use it to shoot someone one of those sinifificant uncontrollable elements?

[–] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 8 points 3 days ago

No, because the existence of some uncontrollable elements doesn’t erase all the controllable elements.

This woman did something very wrong and controllable, which is why she’s in prison.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] echodot@feddit.uk 2 points 2 days ago

Sure but neglected child is always going to turn out worse than one that was properly loved and taken care of. You can't just go oh well child psychology is complicated, so let's just ignore the parents responsibilities.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] manxu@piefed.social 43 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I sense that "child neglect" and "federal weapons" chargess mean there was at least one gun fast and loose and loaded in the house. That sounds like a powder keg waiting to explode in any case.

[–] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 22 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Yeah; a 6 year old will play with anything they get their hands on, you sure as hell don't leave a gun where they can get it. Especially with ammunition available...

[–] Zak@lemmy.world 26 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The Wikipedia article about this case suggests the kid knew what the gun was. He threatened to shoot another student, and probably shot the teacher intentionally. This isn't just a case of a kid randomly playing with a gun.

Of course he's not criminally responsible for that because he's six, but he probably needs an intensive intervention to make sure he doesn't turn into a monster.

[–] Goretantath@lemmy.world 14 points 3 days ago

Yeah, those parents def fucked them up bad..

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 1 points 2 days ago

I suspect that's what the gun charges are for. Proper gun etiquette is not to keep the damn thing loaded.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 17 points 3 days ago (4 children)

“You programmed them”?

Really? That’s an extremely naive take.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (3 children)

If it was her gun (which it was), yeah this makes sense. If the gun was instead found in a trash can or something? idk its a wild world.

[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

If the gun was instead found in a trash can or something?

That's what a jurry would consider after both sides have made their case.

[–] VM_Abrantes@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

I guess this is my sign to start dumpster diving

[–] tornavish@lemmy.cafe 2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

If one is to reach for the most unlikely thing to happen to base their opinion on, then I suppose that you have a point.

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I know a kid who as a teenager beat his mom with his fists, the problem with the "parents are always in control of their kids" idea is its a fantasy. At some point you will end up blaming a victim.

Reasonable precautions should always be made: gun safes, therapy, etc. Kids frequently are smarter or dumber or nicer or meaner than their parents and its always gonna be that way.

[–] tornavish@lemmy.cafe 1 points 1 day ago

I don’t remember anyone saying that parents are always in control of their children? If I am driving a car and I let go of the wheel… It is going to crash.

Please, take some time to come up with another bullshit excuse to justify your feelings

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 days ago (5 children)

If you want to be pedantic, I suppose “got the gun from another kid” is more reasonable?

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 41 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

It also outlined how one instance in which Ms Zwerner allegedly told Ms Parker that the child was in a "violent mood" and had made threats against another child.

Ms Parker allegedly "had no response" and refused to "even look up" when concerns about the child were brought to her.

Ms Parker's lawyer argued that she could not have known what would happen, and that Ms Zwerner has exaggerated the extent of her injuries.

Could not have known? Despite being told the child was making threats to other students?

And exaggerated the extent of her injuries? She was fucking shot by a 6 yo. What’s to exaggerate?

[–] half_fiction@lemmy.dbzer0.com 31 points 3 days ago

That's not even close to the worst part. After Zwerner reported his "violent mood," two other teachers reported to Parker that students were telling them he had a gun... The first searched his backpack and turned up nothing but believed it could have been on his person (they saw him tuck something under his sweatshirt.) Parker's response was that his pockets were too small to hold a gun. Second teacher had another student report he had flashed them the gun in his pocket. Second teacher wanted to search him, but Parker forbade him because the first teacher had already searched his backpack.

That's pretty fucking bad...

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Good on her. I hope she puts that money to good use. Teachers usually have a good head on their shoulders, from my experience.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Depends on the school. Some teachers shouldn't be allowed anywhere near children

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Mine were amazing across the board throughout K-12. That's why I said in my experience.

load more comments
view more: next ›