this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2025
300 points (99.7% liked)

politics

26257 readers
3487 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 38 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 2 points 1 hour ago

While it is of course illegal to throw anything at anyone this should be treated as civil disobedience or an act causing negligible societal harm and be dismissed.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 10 points 7 hours ago

Technically, it was a “meat sandwich” thrown at “point-blank range” only to “explode” all over.

*actual language from the trial. Probably the hottest action meal-team 6 ever got.

[–] Pat_Riot@lemmy.today 79 points 13 hours ago (3 children)

To be fair, this dude singlehandedly carried out a submarine attack.

[–] baronvonj@lemmy.world 19 points 10 hours ago

The DoJ is on the hunt, for bread October.

[–] Zombiepirate@lemmy.world 37 points 12 hours ago

A ballistic missile is a type of missile that follows a ballistic trajectory and is powered only during a relatively brief initial period—most of the flight is unpowered.

It's practically an act of war if you think about it.

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 6 points 11 hours ago

Hoagie handgrenade.

[–] cv_octavio@piefed.ca 12 points 9 hours ago

If corporations are people, then sandwiches are speech.

[–] aarch0x40@lemmy.world 62 points 13 hours ago (3 children)

The US Attorney prosecuting misdemeanors as a priority now? How much more desperate is this adminstation trying to appear?

[–] mcv@lemmy.zip 1 points 52 minutes ago

It's not about the act itself, but about what it represents: resistance to the new regime. He needs to be made an example of just for that.

[–] JollyG@lemmy.world 38 points 13 hours ago (3 children)

It’s only a misdemeanor because the injuries sustained were only categorized as boo-boos. If they had been ouchies, we would be looking at felony charges.

[–] spongebue@lemmy.world 12 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

You don't understand, he could smell the mustard! He probably hates mustard!

[–] aarch0x40@lemmy.world 7 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Don forget about the onions!!

[–] spongebue@lemmy.world 3 points 9 hours ago

Only monsters don't like- oh, right

[–] baronvonj@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago

It was French's mustard, clearly an illegal immigrant sandwich. This Dunn guy was aiding an illegal alien's assault of an officer.

[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 5 points 9 hours ago

They tried for felony charges. Multiple times. The grand juries (plural) refused to indict.

[–] baldingpudenda@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago

Thank god they were wearing vest, they could have died!

[–] thesohoriots@lemmy.world 57 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

“What is the charge? Throwing a meal? A succulent cold-cut meal?”

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

"This is democracy manifest!"

[–] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 hour ago

I love that this meme will never die.

[–] OhStopYellingAtMe@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago

“…and you, sir- are you waiting to receive my limp sandwich?”

[–] spongebue@lemmy.world 39 points 12 hours ago

For those who thought this guy was past this...

A grand jury refused to indict Dunn on a felony assault count, part of a pattern of pushback against the Justice Department’s prosecution of surge-related criminal cases. After the rare rebuke from the grand jury, U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro’s office charged Dunn instead with a misdemeanor.

[–] einlander@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago

They need for this to be a crime, otherwise it sets a precedent of what can be legally done to a federal agent without legally sanctioned retaliation.

[–] workerONE@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago

You have to yell "food fight!" before you do something like that

[–] NaibofTabr 12 points 11 hours ago

Assault with a deli weapon.

[–] Zephorah@discuss.online 16 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

Clearly Trump is trying to make an example of him. A jury trial for a single misdemeanor? Either way, there’s good odds he’ll be financially ruined by the lawyer bill. A trial is a minimum of $15k to start.

This will become an exemplar for We The People to self police going forward.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 7 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

If he hasn't crowd funded his legal expenses it's because he's actively choosing not to. He could be grifting this so hard.

[–] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

Is it a grift if you need the money for the stated purpose?

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 hours ago

No, I mean he could raise way more than his defense will cost. He's kind of one of the mythic figures of the resistance.

When the early revolution is recorded to history, we'll remember such luminaries as the Portland Frog, Polka Dot Lady, and Sandwich Guy.

[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago

A jury trial for a single misdemeanor?

That's your right. The defendant can choose whether to have a jury or bench trial.

Clearly in this case you want the jury. You want them to look at the ridiculousness of the case and throw it the fuck out regardless of the legality.

[–] thagoat@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 13 hours ago

Felony Footlong

[–] Sibshops@lemmy.myserv.one 6 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

I feel like this should just be a fine. Seems like a waste of resources.

[–] snooggums@piefed.world 6 points 11 hours ago

Shouldn't even be a fine, it was a fucking sandwich.

[–] grimpy@lemmy.myserv.one 3 points 11 hours ago

that sandwich had a REALLY HARD CRUST dude!

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 2 points 10 hours ago

Producer Amy Pascal threw a sandwich at producer Kevin Feige over a disagreement about bringing Spiderman into the MCU

[–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Please go to jury. I want to know if jury nullification will happen.

[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago

The trial already started... That's the point of the article. The first paragraph mentions the jury...

[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world 2 points 12 hours ago

And in the near future those things will always be both.