this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2025
748 points (99.9% liked)

iiiiiiitttttttttttt

1284 readers
900 users here now

you know the computer thing is it plugged in?

A community for memes and posts about tech and IT related rage.

founded 6 months ago
MODERATORS
 

I guess now we finally know why Babbage never finished building the Analytical Engine.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] whotookkarl@lemmy.dbzer0.com 53 points 17 hours ago

That quote is my favorite example of a very polite wtf

[–] Wilco@lemmy.zip 12 points 14 hours ago

Confusion of ideas in, garbage out.

[–] Gerudo@lemmy.zip 37 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

So the I-d10t bug has been around since the beginning, it seems.

[–] Brickhead92@lemmy.world 11 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Layer-8 issue, even when it's DNS, it's a Layer-8 issue.

[–] bhamlin@lemmy.world 8 points 12 hours ago

Could be layer 9, management

[–] ieatpwns@lemmy.world 124 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Ada Lovelace invented coding on that thing btw

[–] bluGill@fedia.io 143 points 22 hours ago (3 children)

And then had the wisdom to die before a computer capable of running her programs was invented, thus saving the bother of having to debug them.

[–] notabot@piefed.social 35 points 17 hours ago

Writes code.

Realises that debugging code that was written by the lunatic that is yourself two nights ago is going to be a big part of her life.

dies

We've all had debugging sessions where that feels like the best option. Right?

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 16 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Debugging was easier when all you had to do was spray the room with fly spray and vacuum the tubes.

[–] trollercoaster@sh.itjust.works 2 points 51 minutes ago

Just that the Analytical Engine she'd have had to debug was all gears and levers and cranks and linkages and shit. One wrong move and it'll take off a finger, or a hand, or more.

[–] ieatpwns@lemmy.world 30 points 22 hours ago

I wouldnt have done anything different

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 81 points 22 hours ago (13 children)

I always assumed they were asking if it was rigged.

Like, i can write function sum(a, b) that always returns 10, and impress people how it's correct when I pass in 1,9 and 2,8 and 3,7. But if I pass in 7,7 it'll still return the "right" answer of 10, because it's rigged and not actually doing math.

[–] Deebster@programming.dev 116 points 22 hours ago (4 children)

That's a good point, but a few decades of talking to clients has led to a number of conversations like this where they want it to "just work", even if they've input the wrong information.

[–] Sc00ter@lemmy.zip 52 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

Clients? Shit happens in my house.

"My monitor keeps turning off."

"Ok next time it happens ill look at it and see if i can figure out what is going on."

"Cant you just fix it?"

"Fix what? I dont know whats wrong yet."

"Just fix the monitor."

[–] socsa@piefed.social 24 points 15 hours ago (3 children)

Legitimately, about 1/3 of the time my mere presence seems to magically fix the issue.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 6 points 11 hours ago

i really should have gone into IT because electronics spontaneously break around me

[–] SlurpingPus@lemmy.world 5 points 13 hours ago

There was a thread on Reddit where people likewise noted that having another person try problematic software solved the issue. So one commenter regaled how a dude sidestepped the whole rigmarole by saying to his colleague “look, this thing's broken again”, and then before the other guy could step in, he clicked the thing himself, and it worked.

[–] TRBoom@lemmy.zip 3 points 14 hours ago

Same, I keep track of magic on a white board in my office

[–] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 11 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

I've started defaulting to just saying "yes" with my family and pretending to fix it. I'm actually thankful for the laptop revolution, cause I can just say "it's fucked, buy a new one."

[–] Brickhead92@lemmy.world 10 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Once you've got the new one, I'll take your old one and dispose of it appropriately...

[–] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 7 points 14 hours ago

I have like a dozen old laptops with various flavors of Linux on them because of this. Can't give them away cause apparently Linux is a scary word in this part of the country.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 29 points 21 hours ago (1 children)
[–] drcobaltjedi@programming.dev 32 points 19 hours ago

One time my boss asked me to basically solve the Travelling salesman problem.

My first pass at ot was a simple grab closest neighbor solution, but that left a slightly unoptimal path and my boss asked me to "fix" it. I explained to him why, no, I can't make it both fast amd accurate, pick one, while also showing him that wikipedia page. I was so mad when he said just make it more accurate ignoring now it takes hours to run sometimes only to save 10 seconds of a machine moving.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] trollercoaster@sh.itjust.works 40 points 22 hours ago

I always assumed they were asking if it was rigged.

That's a valid assumption one can only make without knowing the malevolent stupidity of typical computer users.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 28 points 22 hours ago

Alternatively, people could genuinely believe the primitive computer is a "thinking machine". So if you fat-finger an input, will the machine know you made a mistake and intuitively correct you? Not unlike asking "Hey, I've got ten days of vacation, can I take two weeks off?" And your coworker - knowing a week is seven days, but you're only referring to business days - responds "Yes".

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] Potti@lemmy.world 27 points 19 hours ago (2 children)
[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 38 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I've seen a couple papers on theoretical designs for purely mechanical computers that can run doom, but as far as I am aware I've never heard of one that's actually been built.

but in theory yes it could have

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 3 points 11 hours ago

i want to play doom with a flipbook now

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 17 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

it has limited memory but could me expanded, by a lot. but I'm theory yes, no display though.

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 19 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

Pff, who needs a display? Just do that Matrix thing and render the raw state in your head.

[–] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 13 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

I didn't even see the code anymore. It's just; pinky, capro, barron.

[–] SlurpingPus@lemmy.world 4 points 13 hours ago

Person, woman, man, camera, tv.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ramble81@lemmy.zip 29 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

And thus the role of QA was born.

[–] tomiant@programming.dev 15 points 20 hours ago

All unit tests show PEBKAC

[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 34 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

i.e. "I'm not smart enough, nor dumb enough, to understand how you arrived at such a stupid question."

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 9 points 19 hours ago

Being extremely, extremely generous, maybe they meant a human would notice the input was incorrect? But even then, a human could notice the same when inputting it into a computer.

[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

Wasn't it a member of Parliament who asked him this? Or was that addition apocryphal?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›