this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2025
128 points (90.0% liked)

Technology

76581 readers
2709 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] asudox@lemmy.asudox.dev 3 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

I stopped paying for Kagi a few years ago when they decided to introduce even more AI features than they had at the time. So I now run my own SearXNG instance. Fast, good and no AI in it. Just search results.

[–] mlg@lemmy.world 4 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

If you want the meta search functionality, you should try out SearXNG, which is basically self hosted poor man's Kagi lol

[–] MITM0@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

How dare you insult SearXNG😂

[–] puppinstuff@lemmy.ca 7 points 10 hours ago

I pay for it. Finding good results in the first page saves me time and I enjoy the optional AI filters and domain-based weighting.

[–] LunchEnjoyer@lemmy.world 11 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Highly recommend giving this blog post that takes a little bit of a deep dive into Kagi.

https://xn--gckvb8fzb.com/doubting-your-favorite-web-search-engine/

(Not scary url, just punycode) 👍

[–] Nils@lemmy.ca 5 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

The author surely likes that the mascot is a dog. It feels more of a read and analysis of the terms of use than a deep dive of the tool but it was a good reading and I liked the suggestions.

I also liked the "reminder".

Edit: you should share this in some community as a post, every time I see this kind of website (pure content no-nonsense) it is shared is in the comments. 15 years ago this kind of stuff was easy to find, but nowadays, I only see them in comment sections. Even the search engine recommended around here would list a bunch of junk in the first pages.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 4 points 11 hours ago
[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 57 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

Just had a conversation about this. I'll copypasta what I said there.

https://d-shoot.net/kagi.html

tl;dr: they’re all in on AI (their own model, FastGPT, which is terrible), they make some very questionable business decisions with limited funds, and have a poor understanding of what Personally Identifiable Information (PII) actually is.

I could compromise on some of these things, but if I’m going to pay for their service as a Google alternative, I need to compromise less than I do with Google already.

[–] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 16 points 17 hours ago

Also DDG is a perfectly viable option.

[–] SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Appreciate you linking in your blog post. I've been on the fence about Kagi and you bring up a lot of good points informed by sources I'm unlikely to delve into.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 10 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

To put you back on the fence, it had the best algorithm when I tested it some time ago. It showed me things I wanted by default. Google always needs some massaging and ddg needs a !g

[–] EvenOdds@lemmy.zip 3 points 5 hours ago

Agreed. I pay for Kagi, and find their search better than any other, and struggle when I'm forced to use another search engine temporarily.

[–] SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Dammit, my fence picket didn't even get cold!

[–] mmmac@lemmy.zip 9 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah no im with the above user on this one. I have used kagi for over a year now and have never needed to use another search engine to find something

[–] LucidNightmare@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 8 hours ago

Same here.

Finding actual answers or at least able to point me in the right direction is way better than any of the other search engines I’ve tried.

DDG, Google, Bing, SearchNX, Ecosia, Brave, and probably some more, they just aren’t even in the same ball field for the things I look up personally.

[–] tyranical_typhon@lemmings.world 4 points 12 hours ago (1 children)
[–] fdrc_lm@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Imagine trying to advertise anything on the Fediverse 🌚

However this only made Mojeek more appealing

[–] MITM0@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

Mojeek, Gibiru & Swisscows.

[–] Glitchvid@lemmy.world 49 points 21 hours ago (4 children)

I use Kagi because the truth is all other corporate alternatives at this point are unusable swill.

That said, I do not like the company and disagree with their choices in many aspects.

For one, while they don't force you to use AI features, there isn't a way to explicitly turn them off for your account, there always the opportunity to rack up token costs if you accidently hit one of the AI buttons.

They still don't run their own index, instead complacent to just pay the other search providers. Additionally, if you're trying to escape Google... Kagi runs on Google Cloud Services.

There's more complaints, and I'm sure others will chime in, but that's my take.

[–] AnAmericanPotato@programming.dev 23 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

there always the opportunity to rack up token costs if you accidently hit one of the AI buttons.

How do you mean? I don't think there's any way to incur charges for AI usages beyond your subscription fee unless you are coding against their API.

[–] Glitchvid@lemmy.world 4 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

The AI assistant is backed by several different models which IIRC just call out to those providers (Op*nAI API, etc) and rack up tokens in the billing system: image You might be right that the AI cost is included when below the plan price — to that I have to say, give me a fucking cheaper plan that doesn't implicitly include the cost of AI.

[–] Scolding7300@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

https://kagifeedback.org/

Ask/vote for it there, will be useful for others

[–] Glitchvid@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

If you search some people already have. https://kagifeedback.org/d/6842-non-ai-unlimited-plan/39

And... it's not a priority for them, maybe they'll charge you $5 to disable AI features though 🙃

[–] logi@piefed.world 19 points 21 hours ago

Hey, Good job not letting the perfect be the enemy of the good.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 14 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I'm not paying for a search engine. Duck Duck Go for everyday usage. Yandex when I'm looking for media.

[–] blattrules@lemmy.world 12 points 17 hours ago

Yeah, no way do I need another subscription in my life when there’s a suitable substitute.

[–] AnAmericanPotato@programming.dev 24 points 20 hours ago (4 children)

It depends on what you want. I use Kagi but I have not sold it on my friends and family because for most of them, it doesn't really make sense.

I've found it to be the best search engine, but I also think DuckDuckGo is generally fine. The $5/month plan with 300 searches per month is too limiting, IMO. I feel like anyone who searches that lightly will struggle to justify paying for Kagi over using DDG. For unlimited searches you need to step up to the $10/month plan.

When I started using Kagi, I did the free trial and every time I did a search, I'd do it in both Kagi and Google or DDG. It quickly became clear to me that Kagi was better, but I suspect this will vary a lot by your field, your tastes, and your personal search style. I mean, maybe there's someone out there who actually wants to look at Pinterest results. I guess?!

If you ever considered paying for ChatGPT Pro or Claude Pro ($20/month), then Kagi's Ultimate plan ($25/month) is probably a better value. It includes unlimited search, plus access to all the major premium models. On the other hand, ChatGPT Pro gives you access to image generation too, if you care about that.

Kagi's research agent is legitimately great. It is nothing like the bullshit generator Google has. It will take a prompt, then run multiple web searches to get relevant info, recursively if needed, and then give a meaningful response with citations. It shows you the exact search queries it uses, along with the results it pulls from. I've used it to find accurate answers to problems that I realistically could not have found with traditional search engines; in one case the actual answer was something like 18 results deep in the 5th search it performed. I think most people would give up before digging that deep in search results.

This is what AI is good for: automating gruntwork. Not doing things I couldn't do myself, but doing things I don't fucking want to do myself because they are tedious and frustrating. 99% of AI applications are pure garbage. Kagi's is part of the other 1%.

[–] LucidNightmare@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 8 hours ago

Could not have said it better myself. After my trial ended, I realized I was just going to pony up for it. It has probably saved me so much time when I’m doing my own little rabbit hole shenanigans at 2 in the morning when I should have been sleeping 4 hours ago.

[–] Glitchvid@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago

It will take a prompt, then run multiple web searches to get relevant info, recursively if needed, and then give a meaningful response with citations.

Do you have an example of this you can provide verbatim?

I'm just curious; I think the one application LLMs might actually be viable for is exactly this kind of connection finding in a large corpus, and since I'm doing lots of research, I might actually find personal utility.

[–] boatswain 2 points 13 hours ago

I've been on the $5 a month plan, and go over probably half the time. The months when I do go over, it just means I start the next month a couple of days early. I'm probably actually somewhere around $6 a calendar month; my Kagi month is probably only 28 days or so.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TheFeatureCreature@lemmy.ca 20 points 20 hours ago

I am open to the idea of paying for quality services that put the customer first. Hell, I pay for my email and have done so for years.

But Kagi has always squicked me out a bit. Some of their business practices over the years have been rather questionable, especially their push into AI which is exactly the sort of thing someone looking at Kagi would probably want to avoid. They are also very expensive. They're one of those services that just assumes everyone is American so they just give a $ cost and don't specify beyond that, so I'm going to assume their prices are in USD which means a plan for my dad and myself is $21CAD a month. That absurdly overpriced for a search engine subscription.

To put that into perspective: A YouTube premium family plan covers up to 6 accounts and is the same price and includes unlimited video and music streaming. Thoughts about YouTube aside and looking at this from a pure value perspective, paying that same price just for a search engine is a godawful shit deal. Do you know what my email costs per month? $1.25CAD

[–] socphoenix@midwest.social 31 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

Some people like them, they do have at least some ties to a Russian company which is a no from me at the moment.

[–] specialwall@midwest.social 25 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

Paying for Yandex APIs is a product of their goal to be the best search engine available. They pay for access to nearly every major search provider and wouldn't want to lose access to Yandex results just because of the country they're located in.

[–] EvenOdds@lemmy.zip 2 points 4 hours ago

I think it's valid to boycott Russian companies, or any companies that supports them. Justifying it to be the best search engine doesn't necessarily make it right. And yet I still have a paid Kagi subscription, but I don't blame people who don't, and think their use of Yandex should be more obvious.

[–] fox2263@lemmy.world 5 points 16 hours ago

I quite enjoy Qwant

[–] rozodru@pie.andmc.ca 11 points 19 hours ago

I tried it, paid for it, cancelled it. I tested it with the same queries with ddg, startpage, brave, and qwant via 4get. The results were essentially the same. Kagi did provide more context in the description of the results but it wasn't anything I would pay a premium for. the majority of features I just didn't use, the assistant and fastgpt were a waste, lenses were fine and having fediverse on by default is neat but nothing I'd call home about.

If it were cheaper sure, I might stick with it but I can't justify the price to anyone wanting to use a search engine. $5 for 300 searches a month is a joke. I also don't like the fact that if you want to pay with something other than a credit card (paypal, venmo, etc) you get charged extra cause Kagi doesn't want to eat the fees. Also there's zero option to opt out of paying for the "AI" features, you can turn them off sure...but you're still going to pay for them.

If your internet usage consists of constant searching and LLM use for searching then sure, you're going to be paying $10+ a month and be happy with it. But there was nothing Kagi offered that knocked my socks off. if anything, felt like I was getting scammed.

[–] Tim_Bisley@piefed.social 11 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

They added AI which I thought was one of the main points of using an alternative search engine so you could get away from that nonsense?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] fleet@lemmy.ca 8 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

I tried it, and liked it, but stopped using it based on cost. If it was open source or somehow contributed to the open web, I would continue paying for it.

I went searching for a new search engine. I tried SearXNG, but I wasn't impressed with the results. So now I use duckduckgo and ecosia, because if I have to indirectly use google, at least I can get some trees planted in the process.

[–] Engywuck@lemmy.zip 8 points 20 hours ago

IIRC Ecosia and DDG use Bing as their backend, not Google.

[–] Notamoosen@lemmy.zip 12 points 22 hours ago

I'm a fan. It took me a few weeks of properly rating (raising, lowering, and blocking) to get truly customized results. Once I did though, I found I'm able to research far faster than before. I've also become a fan of their AI assistant. It has multiple llm's to choose from and is more private than using them directly.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 12 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (5 children)

I think that you submitted the wrong URL. The submitted URL just points to Kagi's home page (https://kagi.com/), not to an article talking about the Orion browser.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] truthfultemporarily@feddit.org 9 points 21 hours ago

Yes absolutely. The results are actually useful, they don't have an incentive to keep you from finding what you are searching for. There is way less copywritten content and if there is, you can just block it.

Whenever I have to go back to "free" alternatives I am shocked by how much worse it is.

[–] specialwall@midwest.social 9 points 22 hours ago

Personally, it's the only search engine I haven't wanted to get away from

load more comments
view more: next ›