this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2025
458 points (99.4% liked)

politics

26257 readers
3073 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

President backs Cuomo in election eve Truth Social post as Mamdani hits back at Trump’s ‘threat – it is not the law’

On the eve of New York’s well-watched mayoral election, Donald Trump issued a threat to its voters: stop Zohran Mamdani or pay.

“If Communist Candidate Zohran Mamdani wins the Election for Mayor of New York City, it is highly unlikely that I will be contributing Federal Funds, other than the very minimum as required, to my beloved first home,” Trump said in a post on Truth Social. “I don’t want to send, as President, good money after bad.”

Trump’s comments echo those broadcast on Sunday during his appearance on CBS’s 60 minutes, in which he said: “It’s gonna be hard for me as the president to give a lot of money to New York, because if you have a communist running New York, all you’re doing is wasting the money you’re sending there.”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Wilco@lemmy.zip 3 points 34 minutes ago

This is impeachable ... par fot the course with Trump and MAGA. So sick of injustice.

[–] MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world 2 points 22 minutes ago

Hilarious watching these idiots call literally everything they don't like "communism".

[–] Pacattack57@lemmy.world 16 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

The billionaires don’t want you to know this but you pay taxes to the states your business is located in. You don’t just “leave” because taxes. The businesses these billionaires own in New York are still subject to taxes.

What’s crazy is the right has “donated” more money to supporting cuomo than Mamdani would have even taxed them.

[–] MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world 2 points 20 minutes ago

Businesses already set up headquarters in Delaware for tax reasons. They're not going to leave New York City, one of biggest markets on Earth. This argument from conservatives was always stupid.

Yeah but there is no quid pro quo with Mamdani. As far as I know...

[–] frankiehollywood@lemmy.zip 9 points 6 hours ago (1 children)
[–] MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world 3 points 19 minutes ago
[–] Jaysyn@lemmy.world 15 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Trump has a lot of property in New York.

Sure would be a shame if he finally saw some consequences and lost a few dozen of them.

[–] QuoVadisHomines@sh.itjust.works 1 points 22 minutes ago

Does the cityhave the right to seize property or is that the state that would have that authority? I suspect it's at the state level.

[–] betanumerus@lemmy.ca 11 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

djt wouldn't be able to name the communist countries in the world to save his life. It is a very anti-American behavior to label half of Americans as enemies. The US totally includes an opposition party. Idiot still doesn't understand what a democracy is and how to stay in his lane.

[–] HertzDentalBar@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

China and Cuba, that's the only places they ever mention if they do.

[–] QuoVadisHomines@sh.itjust.works 1 points 21 minutes ago
[–] Geobloke@aussie.zone 2 points 4 hours ago

No way, he'd way over estimate

Sweden The UK Venezuela Colombia New Zealand France Etc

[–] DeICEAmerica@lemmy.world 13 points 8 hours ago (3 children)

Whenever these fucks try and paint Americans as terrorists and threaten to cut off anything they create monsters they can't control. Anyone he attacks becomes wildly popular and almost assures them victory. Especially if he has his thugs come rough them up.

Fuck you cancer. You take far too many good people while skipping this piece of shit.

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 hours ago

Well, It did hit Scott Adams, so that's something.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 18 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

Idk man, I see a lot of red caps at a certain party's rallies

red = obvious communist symbolism

I think those caps even say "make america great again" which obviously sounds like a communist slogan

I'd say we arrest these filthy communists 😏

[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

sounds like a communist slogan

I've always been amused by the fact that "gung ho" (which in Mandarin means "pull together", as in pulling on a rope in unison) started out as a slogan of the Chinese Communist Party under Mao and then migrated to the US during WWII because of an openly-communist Marine. Its real meaning is more like "be a team player" but it was somehow transformed into "eagerly shoot brown people".

Also, the Marines' "ooh rah" chant sounds exactly like the Soviet Red Army's chant. More weird shit.

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

“gung ho” (which in Mandarin means “pull together”, as in pulling on a rope in unison)

I'm a native Mandarin speaker and I'm so confused what ur talking about lolz.

You mean like 共和? "together in unison/harmony" aka: "republicanism"?

[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gung_ho

The wikipedia article doesn't mention the "pull together" (as in rope pulling) interpretation. That was from a book about Mao that I read a long time ago, I can't remember what it was. The book had a bit about Evans Carlson traveling with Mao's army and meeting him. I am certainly not a Chinese speaker so I'm happy to have my inaccuracies corrected.

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 hours ago

Sounds like a borrowed term from a random word converted into English. I wasn't aware there were any nationwide propaganda slogan related to it, looks like just some random slogan from a state-owned organization.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 17 points 11 hours ago

So that would mean that New York could stop paying federal taxes, no? I'm sure it contributes more than it receives

I always find it hilarious how red states and their leaders are all about cutting off funds to the blue states that fund their miserable existence. "We will secede from the US!" Ok Boomer, good luck with funding yourself as all of you are so mismanaged that you would fail to feed your own population within the year.

[–] altkey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 36 points 14 hours ago (5 children)

I may be wrong, but isn't NYC more of a money generator than it's a receiver? If that's so, I don't see how NYC would suffer, but it would widen the divide between such areas and poor dotational ones, making their people possible maga recruits.

[–] balance8873@lemmy.myserv.one 16 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

Most blue areas produce money, most red areas (excluding Texas I think) are leeches.

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 hours ago

Florida and Texas are the two notable red states that aren't mostly empty.

[–] Neps@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 10 hours ago (3 children)

T*xas very much does too, despite how much they like to act big and bad and independent.

[–] Soulg@ani.social 2 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

I man they do generate a lot more money than most red states. Being able to admit that doesn't detract anything from the overall point.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] balance8873@lemmy.myserv.one 2 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

I don't know what T*xas is. Is that like Voldemort?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 5 points 12 hours ago

There is still a system in place where states contribute their federal taxes before that revenue is used for whatever we have budgeted. A state doesn't take "their share" first, and states depend on federal funding for a lot of projects and services.

That said, a state with large surpluses can probably write policies to use their state taxes to pay for federal programs that people want to keep, but that's a snarled-up and anti-american system, the taxes are supposed to be used for the people, not be used like a cudgel to enforce political partisanship. There would be a lot of courts who would challenge this, which still might go in Trump's favor because of his corruption of the judicial branch, but that's a LOT of work and expense for something that isn't going to actually get the administration anything but ire from the citizens of one of the ~~country's~~ world's largest, most prominent cities.

Largely, this is as usual, a massive pile of bullshit meant to fit into a right-wing news site's headline ticker, because people largely don't read stories, they just read headlines and don't question it. This kind of rhetoric has always been about making his most powerful asset, his ludicrously stupid and armed and fanatical base feel like he's still big strong daddy choking everyone.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ABetterTomorrow@sh.itjust.works 34 points 15 hours ago

lol NY doesn’t need “his” funds. Trump needs NY funds though.

[–] lilmookieesquire@lemmy.today 37 points 18 hours ago

I really can’t think of higher praise.

load more comments
view more: next ›